Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Back to the movies with Julia Postal  (Read 37276 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #72 on: November 07, 2019, 11:19:19 PM »
Advertisement
At 49:10 ..the suspect was declared the assassin by KBOX news...and then completely mis-identifies Lee Harvey Oswald as being 30 yrs old, blonde, 165 lbs, 5' 10'' etc :-\ 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #72 on: November 07, 2019, 11:19:19 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #73 on: November 07, 2019, 11:21:29 PM »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #74 on: November 08, 2019, 06:03:25 AM »
>>> Resisting arrest is actionable.

A) they had no cause to arrest him when they approached him in the theater. Or even cause to search him.

B) you can’t “resist arrest” before you are actually being arrested.

C) the “resisted” box is unmarked on the arrest report.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #74 on: November 08, 2019, 06:03:25 AM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #75 on: November 08, 2019, 06:10:23 AM »
A) they had no cause to arrest him when they approached him in the theater. Or even cause to search him.

B) you can’t “resist arrest” before you are actually being arrested.

C) the “resisted” box is unmarked on the arrest report.

John,

How many people do you figure were involved in setting Oswald up?

Paine, Truly, Campbell, Baker, Reid, Sawyer, Brewer, Postal, McDonald, ...

The list goes on and on, right?

Iirc, you don't believe Oswald owned that rifle or that revolver.

Do you think Fritz "made up" Oswald's saying, "You know how boys are -- they just like to have a gun with them," or words to that effect?

Do you think McDonad scratched his own face, or had someone other than Oswald do it for him?

etc.

erc.

--  MWT  ;)


.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2019, 02:12:24 PM by Thomas Graves »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #76 on: November 08, 2019, 06:21:58 AM »
I think a better question is, how long will Tommy be allowed to troll the forum with his inane loaded questions?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #76 on: November 08, 2019, 06:21:58 AM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #77 on: November 08, 2019, 06:43:50 AM »
I think a better question is, how long will Tommy be allowed to troll the forum with his inane loaded questions?

John,

What's your definition of "a loaded question"?

One that's difficult for you to answer?

Why are those questions so difficult for you to answer?

Regarding the forum, one wonders why you aren't frequently banned for calling another member a liar.

--  MWT  ;)

PS  What's inane about those questions?

Are you sure you aren't  "projecting," again?

Do those questions make you feel uncomfortable?
« Last Edit: November 08, 2019, 06:51:19 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1500
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #78 on: November 08, 2019, 02:23:41 PM »
You people can't seem to make up your minds, why didn't "Dilbert Fudd" and his Keystone Kops kill Oswald when they had the perfect opportunity?
But two days later after Oswald had access to the media, they suddenly decide Oswald must die?
And how did Postal and Brewer become involved and why, another question that will never receive an answer, it seems that everyone but Oswald was involved up to their eyeballs.
Threads like this which make pointless unprovable accusations shows just how stagnated and worthless the conspiracy movement has become.

JohnM
This is a textbook example of how conspiracists and Oswald defenders want to examine everyone's behavior except for Oswald's.

As in: What the heck was Oswald doing going to a movie (with a fully loaded revolver and five extra bullets in his pocket?) when the president was just shot - apparently - outside the building where he worked? He had no interest at all in what happened? This was a political person. It's absurd to think that suddenly he became apolitical at 12:30 on November 22, 1963.

But let's not look at why he was at the theater. Let's look at Brewer's behavior. And Postal's. And everyone else. Because if you try to understand Oswald's behavior that leads to the conclusion that he was in flight.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2019, 02:33:00 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #79 on: November 08, 2019, 03:23:19 PM »
Being in a theater means you’re in flight? What were Applin, Gibson, and the pregnant lady fleeing from?

Funny how they didn’t “find” those “five extra bullets in his pocket” until a couple of hours after his arrest.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #79 on: November 08, 2019, 03:23:19 PM »