Jesse Curry wrote a book trying to make some money from his "connection" to the tragic events of 22 November 1963.
Curry was both incompetent and grandstanding on Friday, Saturday and Sunday of the assassination weekend.
He knew well (from years of experience) that suspects are rarely "observed" by witnesses (at close distances) during the perpetration of their crimes. If Oswald had not been murdered by Jack Ruby: Curry would have been a witness for the prosecution and enjoyed the limelight. When interviewed by the press after Oswald's conviction: he would have expressed satisfaction at the jury's decision ... guilty.
If you disagree: explain what part Jesse Curry would have played in the defense's case to exonerate Oswald?
Not in November 1963 he didn't when he said the DPD didn't have a case against LHO.
Years of experience from an "incompetent" person.......nice you're really convincing with that one!!
Too many "woulds and ifs" in your post make it not worthy of a response from me anyway.