Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Lee Wotton]

You should try to be more specific Lee. I assume that you are referring to the hole in the shirt being 5 inches below the top of the collar. The hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket . Photos of JFK in the limo show that the jacket had bunched up. Since the hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket, that means that the shirt had bunched up as well.

I did and I clicked on the link. It seems that, if you actually read the article there,  you never understood the content within it. Pamela Brown put to rest the claim that the windshield had a hole in it.

If you are asking me whether I agree with everything in the 888 page Warren Report, then the answer is No.

Pahahaha you were spot on Ray. Tim was right on cue with the bunched up gag

I did read it plus plenty more regarding limo damage,  why did they take the evidence back to Washington and change the windshield? stone chip or bird spombleprofglidnoctobuns perhaps?

I asked if you believed everything in the wc about 3 shots and all related accounts pertaining to my op i.e. how they were accounted for ad all injuries, finds, fragments and damage etc?

[Lee Wotton]

You should try to be more specific Lee. I assume that you are referring to the hole in the shirt being 5 inches below the top of the collar. The hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket . Photos of JFK in the limo show that the jacket had bunched up. Since the hole in the shirt lined up with the hole in the jacket, that means that the shirt had bunched up as well.

I did and I clicked on the link. It seems that, if you actually read the article there,  you never understood the content within it. Pamela Brown put to rest the claim that the windshield had a hole in it.

If you are asking me whether I agree with everything in the 888 page Warren Report, then the answer is No.

Did Connallys acket and shirt temporarily detach from their collars and bunch down?  Maybe a magic jacket and shirt??

[Lee Wotton]

Don't tell me he's one of those tits who wants it to be "proven" that the shirt was bunched up.

Nice surname Jerry suits you.

[Lee Wotton]

I'm guessing they wouldn't have connected the 2 wounds without dissecting the bullet track like the

autopsy Dr.'s did.

And how would seeing the back wound change the appearance of the entrance wound in the front of JFK's

throat?

Exactly Gary.  I notice how no LNer can comment on the missing photo of JFKs upper right lung!!  Because the back shot exting there hit connally.  This complies with the laws of physics and the rounds fired.  There was no entrance wound that could possibly have come out the front of his throat as the throat wound was an entrance wound.

They planted the Parkland bullt before they knew about Tague and messed the whole deal up hence the magic bullet fantasy that the LNers lap up.

[Lee Wotton]

The shots in no particular order:

- JFK's back passing through right lung and through Connally shattering his wrist - from behind

- JFK's throat entrance with no exit fired from front through windshield

- JFK head shot, hollow tipped round from the front

- Connally's left knee from front ricochet off limo windscreen chrome surround from the front.  Leaves fragments in front footwells of limo and under jump seat.

- Miss from behind hit kerb resulting in debris causing Tagues minor injury

- Plant at Parkland before plotters aware of Tague's injury.

What do you think?  LNers need not apply as I've heard it all before!!

[Tim Nickerson]

C7 sounds pretty good.

Sounds good to me too. Who could have ever thought that Ray would eventually see the light?

[Tim Nickerson]

Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission
that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing".

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that]
we don't have."[/i]

Highlight the part of Humes' testimony in which he refers to the existence of a photo that is currently missing.

 

[Tim Nickerson]

Did Connallys acket and shirt temporarily detach from their collars and bunch down?  Maybe a magic jacket and shirt??

Lee, what are you talking about?