Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Steve M. Galbraith]

The joke on you characters is that Kennedy knew it would be easy to get to him, and the irony is that he used the example of 'a nut in a tall building with a high-powered rifle'

Does that scenario ring a bell, Rob?

Well, their conclusion from JFK's comment is that he was obviously in on it too.

Yes, that's tongue in cheek (I guess I had to add that) but this is how they think, how they evaluate evidence. There are no innocent explanations. Not all but unfortunately too many.

[Gary Craig]

Finck thought (wasn't sure) that they had photographed the inside and outside of the skull showing the hole of entry from both sides. He seemed to think that the two blank 4 x 5 color sheets would have been those photos.

"My conclusion is that the photos and x-rays of the autopsy of President Kennedy do not modify our conclusions stated in the autopsy report."

 

No

That's your interpretation of what Finck wrote.

Surprise, Surprise your interpretation keeps your LNer fantasy intact.

[Tim Nickerson]

No

That's your interpretation of what Finck wrote.

Surprise, Surprise your interpretation keeps your LNer fantasy intact.

Finck did not say that there were photos missing. That's not just my interpretation of what he wrote. It's a fact. You are stuck with the autopsy photos. No amount of whining or knashing of teeth will make them go away. Nor will it make non-existing photos appear out of nowhere. Autopsy photos show that the entry wound at the base of the neck in the back was higher that the exit wound in the throat.

[Tim Nickerson]

No

That's your interpretation of what Finck wrote.

Surprise, Surprise your interpretation keeps your LNer fantasy intact.

How would the existence of photos showing the inside and outside of the entry wound in the skull have any impact at all on my "LN fantasy"?

[Gary Craig]

How would the existence of photos showing the inside and outside of the entry wound in the skull have any impact at all on my "LN fantasy"?

Well it's your "LN Fantasy", but let me see if I can help you out.

The WC conclusion is based on the original autopsy opinions. - The entry wound in JFK's shull was

slightly above and slightly to the right of the EOP.

Critics said a wound that low on JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD,

doesn't jibe with the official explanation of JFK's wounds.

The Clark Panel was formed to re-examine the autopsy materials in response.

The panel said there is a entry wound in the cowlick of JFK's skull - 4 inches above the EOP wound.

All subsequent official investigations including the HSCA agree with the Clark Panel.

The photos of the gunshot inshoot and outshoot wound at the EOP on JFK's skull is a second wound.

If I have to explain what that means, you are lost.

[Tim Nickerson]

Well it's your "LN Fantasy", but let me see if I can help you out.

The WC conclusion is based on the original autopsy opinions. - The entry wound in JFK's shull was

slightly above and slightly to the right of the EOP.

Critics said a wound that low on JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD,

doesn't jibe with the official explanation of JFK's wounds.

The Clark Panel was formed to re-examine the autopsy materials in response.

The panel said there is a entry wound in the cowlick of JFK's skull - 4 inches above the EOP wound.

All subsequent official investigations including the HSCA agree with the Clark Panel.

The photos of the gunshot inshoot and outshoot wound at the EOP on JFK's skull is a second wound.

If I have to explain what that means, you are lost.

Photos of the inshoot and outshoot wound at the EOP on JFK's skull would not be a second wound. It would be the wound. The photos and x-rays of the autopsy of President Kennedy do not modify the conclusions stated in the autopsy report.  Critics who said a wound that low on JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD , doesn't jibe with the official explanation of JFK's wounds were wrong.

[Gary Craig]

Photos of the inshoot and outshoot wound at the EOP on JFK's skull would not be a second wound. It would be the wound. The photos and x-rays of the autopsy of President Kennedy do not modify the conclusions stated in the autopsy report.  Critics who said a wound that low on JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD , doesn't jibe with the official explanation of JFK's wounds were wrong.

"Photos of the inshoot and outshoot wound at the EOP on JFK's skull would not be a second wound."

 

The Clark Panel and HSCA both said there is a wound in JFK's skull 4 inches above the EOP.

A wound at the EOP and one 4 inches above.

That 2 wounds here on Earth.

In LNer fantasyland it might be something else.

[Tim Nickerson]

"Photos of the inshoot and outshoot wound at the EOP on JFK's skull would not be a second wound."

 

The Clark Panel and HSCA both said there is a wound in JFK's skull 4 inches above the EOP.

A wound at the EOP and one 4 inches above.

That 2 wounds here on Earth.

In LNer fantasyland it might be something else.

A wound slightly above the EOP would mean that the Clark Panel and the HSCA were wrong. Which they probably were. They primarily used the defect in the scalp seen in the photo to make their placement of the wound in the skull. The x-rays themselves were not of good enough quality to make such a determination. There was only one entry wound in the back of the skull. The photos and x-rays of the autopsy of President Kennedy do not modify the conclusions stated in the autopsy report. Finck said so himself.