Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Gary Craig]

Correct

Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken.

They never disappeared because they never existed in the first place. However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:

~snip~

Now, excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.

"Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken."

Right, the POTUS is assassinated.

The fatal wound(s) are to his head.

The missile wound expert at the autopsy requests photos be taken of the fatal wound(s).

The person taking the photos doesn't take the photos?

Come on now, I was born at night, but it wasn't last night.

"They never disappeared because they never existed in the first place."

LOL

"However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:"

So what?

They have nothing to do with the photos Finck had taken of the underlining bone.

They showed the cratering that indicated the direction the bullet came from.

[Ray Mitcham]

Maybe some context and explain what you're getting at?

Sorry that you can't follow, Jerry.  What causes the solid black area at the back of the head (as shown by yellow arrow)?

[Tim Nickerson]

"Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken."

Right, the POTUS is assassinated.

The fatal wound(s) are to his head.

The missile wound expert at the autopsy requests photos be taken of the fatal wound(s).

The same missile wound expert who reported that there was only one entry wound in the back of the skull and that the wound was slightly above the EOP and 2.5 cms to the right of the midline. Deal with it.

"However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:"

So what?

They have nothing to do with the photos Finck had taken of the underlining bone.

They have everything to do with what we were discussing before you decided to divert away.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,233.msg7125.html#msg7125





Excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.

[Ray Mitcham]

The area is oblique and receiving less direct light.

Now what are you getting at?

"The area is oblique and receiving less direct light."   

Not very good at understanding photos, are you, Jerry.

[Tim Nickerson]

So the measurements were?

7mm x 4mm.

[Ray Mitcham]

Like I say, Ray, you're getting at something specific with that question. Why not cut to the chase and share it in the original question?

The area has been "blacked" in.

[John Anderson]

How do you explain the solid black hair at the back of the head, John?

Well it's definitely not the entry wound in his back.

[Bill Chapman]

How do you explain the solid black hair at the back of the head, John?

The back of JFK's head is in shadow.
 
Simply not enough light in that area of the head to reveal hair.



Closest I could (quickly) find to similar lighting and head angle