Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Lee Wotton]

"I also have years experience in shooting and hunting. No shots came from the front that day."

That's convincing!     

Pahahahaha lets talk about the magic bullet later hahahahaha  It is getting on for 55 years later hahahaha

[John Iacoletti]

The same missile wound expert who reported that there was only one entry wound in the back of the skull and that the wound was slightly above the EOP and 2.5 cms to the right of the midline. Deal with it.

And by "slightly", he meant 4.5 inches?

[Tim Nickerson]

Bottom line, the description of the location of the hole in JFK's back was changed in the final draft of the

WCR to accommodate Arlen Spector's theory about a Magic Bullet causing seven wounds in JFK & JBC.

When public criticism of the WC caused the government to re-examine the autopsy photos , x-rays etc,

a photo of JFK's right lung and chest cavity, that would have showed the direction and path of that missile,

was nowhere to be found.

The same criticism noted the entry point low on the back of JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the

6th floor SE corner TSBD, doesn't jibe with the official account of the damage. Another

government re-examination of the autopsy materials found the photos of the hole in JFK's skull at the

EOP were not in the archive. Those photos, of the inside and outside of the skull bone,

where the bullet entered, were taken specifically to show cratering.

Cratering indicates the direction the missile was fired from.

Not long after, the Clark Panel decided the original autopsy had got it wrong. It determined the photos and

x-rays show the entry point was 4 inches higher, at the cowlick. The x-rays show a trail of metal

particles high on JFK's skull. Caused, apparently, by the path of a disintegrating projectile.

Two seperate government investigations, two seperate wounds to JFK's head.

Deal with it.


"They have everything to do with what we were discussing before you decided to divert away.

~snip~

Excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no."

LOL

Why are you avoiding answering the question. What are you afraid of?





Are those autopsy photos authentic? Yes or no.

[Tim Nickerson]

And by "slightly", he meant 4.5 inches?

By slightly , he meant less than an inch.

[Tim Nickerson]

Bottom line, the description of the location of the hole in JFK's back was changed in the final draft of the

WCR to accommodate Arlen Spector's theory about a Magic Bullet causing seven wounds in JFK & JBC.

When public criticism of the WC caused the government to re-examine the autopsy photos , x-rays etc,

a photo of JFK's right lung and chest cavity, that would have showed the direction and path of that missile,

was nowhere to be found.

The same criticism noted the entry point low on the back of JFK's skull, from a bullet fired from the

6th floor SE corner TSBD, doesn't jibe with the official account of the damage. Another

government re-examination of the autopsy materials found the photos of the hole in JFK's skull at the

EOP were not in the archive. Those photos, of the inside and outside of the skull bone,

where the bullet entered, were taken specifically to show cratering.

Cratering indicates the direction the missile was fired from.

Not long after, the Clark Panel decided the original autopsy had got it wrong. It determined the photos and

x-rays show the entry point was 4 inches higher, at the cowlick. The x-rays show a trail of metal

particles high on JFK's skull. Caused, apparently, by the path of a disintegrating projectile.

Two seperate government investigations, two seperate wounds to JFK's head.

Deal with it.

I don't deal with BS.

[Tim Nickerson]

I always find it interesting when someone says that a shot came through the front windshield of the Limo. Let's look at that.
1. None of the people in the car that day reported a shot coming through the windshield. Not Greer, Kellerman, Nellie, Gov. Connally, or Jackie said so.
2. The investigation of the windshield showed the glass was struck from the inside and had lead residue from the bullet on the inside.
3. There was no through hole to the windshield.
4. Jim Altgens famous photo from the front of the car shows the President reacting to the shot in his back and through his throat but there is no hole in the windshield.
5. The chip in the windshield is high on the glass. There were two police officers on the triple underpass and no shots were reported from that area.
6. In order for a shooter to shoot through the windshield based on the position of the car and the angle and incline of Elm street, a shooter would have to had been right out in the open lying prone on either Commerce or Main street.
7. From the angle needed to produce that shot, Governor Connally obstructed the view of the president.
8. No trained shooter in his right mind would lie in the open and risk missing his target by shooting through a safety glass, especially when said target is as important as the president of the United States.
9. Where did the bullet go and where is the exit wound for that shot? Full body x-rays were performed on the president and no bullets or fragments were found in his body.
I have studied the assassination for decades now and been to Dealy Plaza several times and gone over all the ground and angles. There was no shot from the front through the windshield. We can discuss the so called magic bullet later. I also have years experience in shooting and hunting. No shots came from the front that day.

Right on Wesley. Welcome to the forum.

[John Iacoletti]

3. There was no through hole to the windshield.

Stavis Ellis, H. R. Freeman, Richard Dudman, Evalea Glanges, George Whitaker, Sr, and Charles Taylor, Jr. beg to differ.

4. Jim Altgens famous photo from the front of the car shows the President reacting to the shot in his back and through his throat but there is no hole in the windshield.

Or is there?

[Tim Nickerson]

Stavis Ellis, H. R. Freeman, Richard Dudman, Evalea Glanges, George Whitaker, Sr, and Charles Taylor, Jr. beg to differ.

Or is there?

Want to bet?