I have a question that I?ve wondered about, which may take a psychologist to answer.
Didn?t most everyone testify they first heard 1) firecracker/tire blow out/backfire 2) gunshot 3) gunshot so that all the testimonies that subsequently said shot, shot, shot have technically been testimonies that have been changed? What made them all change their testimony? How is a human?s perception of sound vs time-sequencing influenced by first hearing a sound that is internally judged inconsequential (fire cracker etc.) and is just dismissed, but later the individual has a rapid change in awareness/alertness as they realized a shooting was happening after hearing/realizing two gun shots occurred shortly thereafter?