Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 95949 times)

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #392 on: March 12, 2020, 12:02:12 AM »
Advertisement
It's hard to buy the sack story when the rifle found isn't even the same one as in the backyard photo. If there was 2 rifles then there had to be some funny spombleprofglidnoctobuns going on. Just look at the shoulder straps for both and you'll see the difference.

And his rifle was supposed to be brand new, right? Yet the Military said it was barely functional.

Quote
The experts from the US Army and the FBI who had tested the rifle discovered that it was actually not usable in its original state:

  1.  Shims had to be applied to the telescopic sight before the rifle could be aimed
  2.  Even after the telescopic sight had been repaired, it proved unreliable and inaccurate
  3.  The condition of both the bolt and the trigger pull meant that the rifle could not be aimed accurately

The rifle discovered on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository could not have caused any of the wounds to Kennedy, Connally or Tague, except by accident.

“They [the US Army marksmen] could not sight the weapon in using the telescope, and no attempt was made to sight it in using the iron sight. We did adjust the telescopic sight by the addition of two shims, one which tended to adjust the azimuth, and one which adjusted an elevation”: Warren Commission Hearings, vol.3, p.443.

According to the FBI’s firearms specialist, “Every time we changed the adjusting screws to move the crosshairs in the telescopic sight in one direction it also affected the movement of the impact or the point of impact in the other direction. … We fired several shots and found that the shots were not all landing in the same place, but were gradually moving away from the point of impact.”: Warren Commission Hearings, vol.3, p.405.

Problems with the bolt and the trigger mechanism: “There were several comments made — particularly with respect to the amount of effort required to open the bolt. … There was also comment made about the trigger pull … in the first stage the trigger is relatively free, and it suddenly required a greater pull to actually fire the weapon.”: Warren Commission Hearings, vol.3, p.449.

“The pressure to open the bolt was so great that that we tended to move the rifle off the target.”: ibid., p.451.

Does that sound like a new rifle to anyone?

And something else that makes no sense...  Oswald was a trained Marine. Doesn't anyone think a Marine would find a better spot, like the roof? Oswald could have easily gone to the roof. It's a better view, not to mention concealment. It just doesn't make sense.

If the rifle was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, then the bag was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns too.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #392 on: March 12, 2020, 12:02:12 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #393 on: March 12, 2020, 12:18:59 AM »
And his rifle was supposed to be brand new, right? Yet the Military said it was barely functional.

Who said the rifle was supposed to be brand new?

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #394 on: March 12, 2020, 03:03:02 AM »
Who said the rifle was supposed to be brand new?

LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

https://harveyandlee.net/Mail_Order_Rifle/Mail_Order_Rifle.html

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKSmannlicher.htm

https://nypost.com/2013/11/19/oswald-rifle-yard-virtually-the-same-since-1963/

Should I go on?  Apparently all the Oswald swallowers who believe everything the habitual lying cops & government say, think it's true. Personally I know better. But swallowers swallow everything, except the truth, which they usually label conspiracy theories.  lol

Whenever there's an abundance of evidence at every turn, people should be skeptical.  Because people who commit crimes aren't usually gonna leave bread crumbs with directions to their house, their birth certificates, drivers licenses, lots of finger prints and a giant neon sign that say's "here I am!"  I mean at some point it becomes a little too obvious. But maybe it's just me. I don't know.

I mean seriously... who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible, just in case I shoot the president one day.." lol   

"I'm gonna order a rifle under a fake name, but make sure it comes to my p.o. box under my real name...because why not?"  And grown ass men are like.. "Oh  yeah... sounds legit!" smh 

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2020, 03:25:18 AM by Izraul Hidashi »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #394 on: March 12, 2020, 03:03:02 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #395 on: March 12, 2020, 05:25:22 AM »
LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

https://harveyandlee.net/Mail_Order_Rifle/Mail_Order_Rifle.html

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKSmannlicher.htm

https://nypost.com/2013/11/19/oswald-rifle-yard-virtually-the-same-since-1963/

Should I go on?  Apparently all the Oswald swallowers who believe everything the habitual lying cops & government say, think it's true. Personally I know better. But swallowers swallow everything, except the truth, which they usually label conspiracy theories.  lol

Whenever there's an abundance of evidence at every turn, people should be skeptical.  Because people who commit crimes aren't usually gonna leave bread crumbs with directions to their house, their birth certificates, drivers licenses, lots of finger prints and a giant neon sign that say's "here I am!"  I mean at some point it becomes a little too obvious. But maybe it's just me. I don't know.

I mean seriously... who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible, just in case I shoot the president one day.." lol   

"I'm gonna order a rifle under a fake name, but make sure it comes to my p.o. box under my real name...because why not?"  And grown ass men are like.. "Oh  yeah... sounds legit!" smh 

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

Oswald swallowers
That would be the Oswald apologists

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #396 on: March 12, 2020, 06:06:57 AM »
LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

https://harveyandlee.net/Mail_Order_Rifle/Mail_Order_Rifle.html

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKSmannlicher.htm

https://nypost.com/2013/11/19/oswald-rifle-yard-virtually-the-same-since-1963/

Should I go on?  Apparently all the Oswald swallowers who believe everything the habitual lying cops & government say, think it's true. Personally I know better. But swallowers swallow everything, except the truth, which they usually label conspiracy theories.  lol

Whenever there's an abundance of evidence at every turn, people should be skeptical.  Because people who commit crimes aren't usually gonna leave bread crumbs with directions to their house, their birth certificates, drivers licenses, lots of finger prints and a giant neon sign that say's "here I am!"  I mean at some point it becomes a little too obvious. But maybe it's just me. I don't know.

I mean seriously... who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible, just in case I shoot the president one day.." lol   

"I'm gonna order a rifle under a fake name, but make sure it comes to my p.o. box under my real name...because why not?"  And grown ass men are like.. "Oh  yeah... sounds legit!" smh 

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

He was out-voted by his support team Alex Hidel, OH Lee, and Dirty Harvey. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #396 on: March 12, 2020, 06:06:57 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #397 on: March 12, 2020, 09:52:30 AM »

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

He was out-voted by his support team Alex Hidel, OH Lee, and Dirty Harvey. 


So it was a democratic conspiracy?


Who, me? Nah, I was at a Looney Bin searching for Stephen King's time-disrupter closet


It surely has a ring of truth to it....

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #398 on: March 12, 2020, 03:27:29 PM »
LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

That didn't answer the question.  Who said the rifle was supposed to be brand new?


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #399 on: March 12, 2020, 04:28:36 PM »
LOL  Are you messing with me?  Who said Oswald ordered a rifle under the name A. Hidell? Clearly it was bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns, but it didn't stop the police & FBI from claiming it happened, right? Or I'm I mistaken?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

https://harveyandlee.net/Mail_Order_Rifle/Mail_Order_Rifle.html

https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKSmannlicher.htm

https://nypost.com/2013/11/19/oswald-rifle-yard-virtually-the-same-since-1963/

Should I go on?  Apparently all the Oswald swallowers who believe everything the habitual lying cops & government say, think it's true. Personally I know better. But swallowers swallow everything, except the truth, which they usually label conspiracy theories.  lol

Whenever there's an abundance of evidence at every turn, people should be skeptical.  Because people who commit crimes aren't usually gonna leave bread crumbs with directions to their house, their birth certificates, drivers licenses, lots of finger prints and a giant neon sign that say's "here I am!"  I mean at some point it becomes a little too obvious. But maybe it's just me. I don't know.

I mean seriously... who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible, just in case I shoot the president one day.." lol   

"I'm gonna order a rifle under a fake name, but make sure it comes to my p.o. box under my real name...because why not?"  And grown ass men are like.. "Oh  yeah... sounds legit!" smh 

With all the evidence he left everywhere he might as well have walked out of work with the damn rifle in his hand.

who the hell is going to pose with a rifle while holding up a communist manifesto? Unless they just wanna get caught and are trying to make sure that everyone knows it's them. "Here's my guns... and my communist bible,

Question:.....Who is going to pose with a rifle while holding up communist literature?? 

Answer:..... Someone who wants Castro to believe that he's a armed and ready communist revolutionary, who attempted to shoot  Castro's most vocal foe.

Lee intended for that photo to "fall into the hands"of the police ( and consequently the newspapers) where it would be published along with the story about the attempt on General Walker's life.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #399 on: March 12, 2020, 04:28:36 PM »