Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 96226 times)

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #128 on: March 04, 2020, 03:14:15 PM »
Advertisement
Actually I think the discovery by Patrick of the bag in the picture does prove what Biffle stated on 11/22 and Day on 7/11/06:

" We all stood around staring at the brown wrapping paper found nearby."

 The Bag was discovered "nearby" and placed on top of the boxes before they realized its importance. In an odd way it validates the evidence collection because after realizing the mistake, Day decided to not stage the location of the bag and photograph the bag because it had been moved. They never wanted to admit the mistake by one of the detectives.

This is also what Day stated in his last statement.
"They had posted guards or something around it and they didn't have the sense to leave things alone. And they'd got in there and picked up a sack that was in this corner. And we didn't get a picture of it. But there was a sack right in that corner...the brown paper bag. It was the one he was supposed to have brought curtain rods in. Well, they picked it up while I was gone, and I didn't get a picture of it while it was sitting there."

Yes, I agree. I think that one or more of them probably assumed that the bag had already been photographed. Otherwise, they should have known better than to disturb it. And Patrick’s discovery of the bag in the photo (which appears to have been taken during the applicable time period) should help to confirm these things.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #128 on: March 04, 2020, 03:14:15 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #129 on: March 04, 2020, 03:36:27 PM »
No he didn’t say any such thing. And who taught you English vocabulary? I suggest you consult a dictionary.
I just did and it said that you don't know what in hell you're talking about.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #130 on: March 04, 2020, 03:42:37 PM »
Yes, I agree. I think that one or more of them probably assumed that the bag had already been photographed. Otherwise, they should have known better than to disturb it. And Patrick’s discovery of the bag in the photo (which appears to have been taken during the applicable time period) should help to confirm these things.

A person would have to take leave of their good sense to believe anything that John Carl Day said ...  Just as a person has to take leave of their good sense ( and ignore what they know to be the truth)  to believe Joe Biden.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #130 on: March 04, 2020, 03:42:37 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #131 on: March 04, 2020, 03:45:15 PM »
A person would have to take leave of their good sense to believe anything that John Carl Day said ...  Just as a person has to take leave of their good sense ( and ignore what they know to be the truth)  to believe Joe Biden.

Reality has a way of disturbing fantasies...

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #132 on: March 04, 2020, 04:01:34 PM »
Reality has a way of disturbing fantasies...

Yes, that true....  thus the Warren Report is "disturbed" 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #132 on: March 04, 2020, 04:01:34 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #133 on: March 04, 2020, 04:23:56 PM »
Yes, that true....  thus the Warren Report is "disturbed"

Dream on...

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #134 on: March 04, 2020, 04:54:25 PM »
Trask didn't have access to the digitized copies of the bag in front of the building now available. As first noticed by the late great researcher John Hunt, and presented on the Lancer Forum, if I recall, Montgomery's watch was fairly clear in one of the photos. Here is a close-up of that watch.



Well, photo-manipulation techniques are available
I don't think you'd get that one by a sharp prosecutor
But thanks for the contribution nevertheless.

Beers, Allen, and Smith likely had their own watches
A precise time of 2:19 sounds like someone looked at their own watch
« Last Edit: March 04, 2020, 05:15:14 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #135 on: March 04, 2020, 05:43:36 PM »
Does Trask give a source for his "2:19"?

Patrick's discovery of what may be CE 142 on top of boxes in a Dallas PD photo unfortunately tells us nothing about who placed it there and when.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #135 on: March 04, 2020, 05:43:36 PM »