Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.

[Bill Chapman]

He left Dallas 2-weeks after the attempt on Walker.

Oops, wrong scenario. My bad. May a thousand camels fart in my general direction*

*Gleaned from Monty Python ('The Holy Grail' I think)

[Charles Collins]

Oh boy, it's worse than I thought. There is nothing hypothetical about either question. Both are in fact the same question and both have only one purpose; to obtain a response from the person who is asked.

A hypothetical question requires no response at all!

hypothetical question - Legal Definition
n

A question, based on assumptions rather than facts, directed to an expert witness intended to elicit an opinion


https://www.yourdictionary.com/hypothetical-question

[Martin Weidmann]

hypothetical question - Legal Definition
n

A question, based on assumptions rather than facts, directed to an expert witness intended to elicit an opinion


https://www.yourdictionary.com/hypothetical-question

You are correct. My bad... I mixed up hypothetical with rhetorical.

But, hypothetical or not, at least you now agree that I asked a question. Well done  We'll get there in the end... baby steps, baby steps...

[John Mytton]

Notice how John Mytton dropped out of his own topic as soon as it was discovered that he was busted for taking credit for Patrick Jackson's moves.

From the very FIRST post in this thread.

Btw I can't find the poster who originally found this groundbreaking evidence but if it was you, tell me and I will credit you!

JohnM

This is the very reason I haven't been posting very often. The majority All of the CTs here are so blinded by their paranoia that they lack the ability for rational debate and instead of making this about the evidence they keep attacking the messenger, and the way this thread has descended into chaos is ironically the perfect example.
After half a century not 1 conspiracy theory has been proved, not 1 person has come forward and claimed responsibility for any of these wacky theories, it's just accusation after accusation and a plethora of innocent people are just thrown onto the fire. Whereas all of the official investigations time after time, come to the same rock solid conclusion, go figure.

JohnM

[Colin Crow]

A simple question for the LN proponents. Who discovered CE142 on the sixth floor of the TSBD?

Well? For such a crucial piece of evidence and an exhaustive investigation how hard can this be to answer?

[Colin Crow]

From the very FIRST post in this thread.

This is the very reason I haven't been posting very often. The majority All of the CTs here are so blinded by their paranoia that they lack the ability for rational debate and instead of making this about the evidence they keep attacking the messenger, and the way this thread has descended into chaos is ironically the perfect example.
After half a century not 1 conspiracy theory has been proved, not 1 person has come forward and claimed responsibility for any of these wacky theories, it's just accusation after accusation and a plethora of innocent people are just thrown onto the fire. Whereas all of the official investigations time after time, come to the same rock solid conclusion, go figure.

JohnM

Asked from early on. Your assertion that is was Oswald's bag. When was the photo taken and who took it? Maybe you missed my post.

[Walt Cakebread]

Bottom line is that it would be dumb to be carrying a sizeable package around that day.
Especially shortly after the assassination, and especially a duffel bag.

Don't you think so?
 

The 40 " Carcano will not fit in a duffel bag......

[Colin Crow]

A simple question for the LN proponents. Who discovered CE142 on the sixth floor of the TSBD?

I would ask members for a measure of thread discipline (I know.....but I’m a glass half full guy).

Who will be the first to help me out? After all it’s your narrative.