This is pretty simple. If someone planted Oswald's wallet at the Tippit murder scene to frame him, it would not take Nostradamus for them to know that Oswald would likely have a second wallet on him when arrested or killed. That would not have been cause to abandon their plan to "find" an Oswald wallet at the Tippit scene. Such a wallet found at the Tippit murder scene would have been fantastic evidence to link Oswald to that crime. A wallet in his pocket upon arrest provides no probative value. But it gets even better. Whomever planted the wallet at the Tippit scene in this fairy tale is also apparently in a position to suppress one of the wallets. And which one do they decide to suppress? Wait for it - wait for it - the wallet they themselves have planted with its extreme probative value! HA HA HA to that. That's ridiculous as a narrative if you give more than three seconds of thought. Unfortunately, it's not Oswald's wallet. If the DPD had said it was found there, however, nuts would be here arguing that he wouldn't have left it at the scene with profound arguments like "Oswald's wallet. LOL." What difference does it make in this context how many wallets Oswald owned and kept at home etc? None.
But it gets even better. Whomever planted the wallet at the Tippit scene in this fairy tale is also apparently in a position to suppress one of the wallets. And which one do they decide to suppress? Wait for it - wait for it - the wallet they themselves have planted with its extreme probative value! HA HA HA to that. That's ridiculous as a narrative if you give more than three seconds of thought. Who said that the wallet found at the Tippit scene is the one that was suppressed?
Paul Bentley was the officer who took Oswald's wallet from him during the ride to the police station. The next day he is interviewed on television and asked what he found in the wallet to which he replies; the usual stuff; a credit card and a driver's license. Not a word about any document with the name Hidell on it. Bentley never files a report about what he found in the wallet, nor does he testify before WC or even gave them even a statement. There isn't a word on paper anywhere about the content of the wallet Bentley took from Oswald. Think about that, for a minute!!!!!
On the other hand, FBI agent Barrett is on record saying that Captain Westbrook was looking at a wallet at the Tippit murder scene and asked him if he had ever heard of Oswald or Hidell. FBI Hosty confirms in his book that Barrett told him about it and DPD officer Croy confirmed, prior to his death, that he was the one who found that wallet. But for Richard that's not corroboration. It's just three cops not telling the truth...
So, what happened next? Gus Rose had a day off and is called back to work. When he gets to the station, Oswald had just been brought in.
Somebody (nobody knows who!) gave Rose a wallet and bingo, now there suddenly is one wallet which contains no credit card or drivers license but it does contain a fake ID for Hidell.... Go figure.
Now, I wonder what could have happened there.... Who was the person that gave Gus Rose the wallet? Who was the officer that presented the wallet to the evidence room, and why wasn't that Paul Bentley, as it should have been?
Guys like Richard will ignore and deny these facts (because that's what the are, as it is all on record in one way or another) and call them a "fairy tale" rather than trying to explain what possibly happened here. It must be easier for him to just laugh it off and dream up some so-called "logic" why it couldn't have happened that way.
Unfortunately, it's not Oswald's wallet.It may not have been, but how would you know that?
So, who did it belong to? It wasn't Tippit's because his wallet was identified by Marie Tippit and is at the National Archives. If it belonged to somebody else, why is there no record of anybody claiming it or of the wallet being returned?
Now all we have to do is wait for another rant by Richard telling us that it is all too stupid and none of it could have happened.
