The unwillingness of nuts like Martin and John I. to accept that Marina saw a rifle in the blanket despite her clear testimony on that point is a classic example of their dishonest and contrarian approach to this case. Marina is asked repeatedly about a "rifle" in her testimony. In each instance she answers the question. Never once does she interject any doubt that she is talking about a rifle rather than some generic object made of wood. And of course a rifle stock is made of wood. But that doesn't give a moments pause to loons like M&J. They are off and running while ignoring the totality of her testimony in which she makes reference to a "rifle" and responds to questions about a "rifle." And, of course, Marina has never changed her story in the last fifty plus years that Oswald stored the rifle in Paine's garage. These jokers have no interest in the truth. This is just a endless game to take issue with everything that points to Oswald's guilt. And these are the same dishonest nuts that claim they are not alleging a vast conspiracy. But they reject evidence of Oswald's ownership of the rifle and all the documents, prints, pictures and testimony that link him to that rifle. Imagine how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy just to fabricate that evidence. It boggles the mind.
Poor Richard,
Still whining about those horrible people who disagree with you... Details matter, Richie, and you are not seeing them.
I bet that you have ignored completely that Marina said she only looked in the blanket once and that was about a week after Ruth Paine had picked her up in New Orl?ans, which makes it competely irrelevant what she actually saw, whether it was a rifle or not.
