If he was set up, why shoot him? Regardless of what Oswald would have said nobody would have believed him. Not silencing Jack Ruby would have been a bigger threat.
If Oswald was a lone nut, why shoot him? If there were no conspirators?
In fact, shooting Oswald created non necessary conspiracy theories ...
If he was set up, why shoot him? Regardless of what Oswald would have said nobody would have believed him.In your opinion, that is... right? The question is easily countered by this one: why take the risk that somebody might believe him?
Not silencing Jack Ruby would have been a bigger threat.Again, in your opinion, right? And how do you know this? If it was a mob hit as some suggest it was (and btw I'm not claiming it was, as I wasn't involved and don't know) couldn't it be that Jack Ruby was far easier to control than Oswald would have been?
If Oswald was a lone nut, why shoot him? If there were no conspirators?If there were no conspirators, then Jack Ruby would have been the only person who could have answered that question.
In fact, shooting Oswald created non necessary conspiracy theories ...Excuse me, but the biggest creator of conspiracy theories was the WC, who left so many crucial questions unanswered and jumped to conclusions not supported by the evidence that IMO it was inevitable that there would be conspiracy theories.... and who knows, one of those might actually be true or very close to the truth.
I get that you find these things implausible, but it could very well be that you, like the rest of us, are simply not privy to all the facts and it isn't easy to solve a puzzle when some pieces are missing. Things sometimes happen that at first don't make any sense, yet once everything is out in the open suddenly make perfect sense.
But by all means keep asking questions... who knows what you may end up learning some day.