The timing discrepancy defense based on an speed of movement from North Beckley to Tenth and Patton does not work. It may have before the horse and buggy era. With motorized transport.... Oswald traveling between those two points in 12 minutes (if that's what it was) is not IMPOSSIBLE. Oswald could have gotten a lift (part of the way) in a car. I don't think that happened but it's a possibility no matter how slim.
Oswald traveling between those two points in 12 minutes (if that's what it was) is not IMPOSSIBLE.The fastest time established by Gary Mack's time trial was 11 minutes. 1.03 + 11 = 1.14.... and that does not include the time Tippit and his killer talked. However, the available evidence justifies the conclusion that Tippit was actually shot earlier than 1.14
Oswald could have gotten a lift (part of the way) in a car. I don't think that happened but it's a possibility no matter how slim. So, if a slim possibility favors Oswald's guilt, you accept it as a possibility, but when it doesn't you dismiss it outright. Got it.
But there is in interesting question that is never answered by those who claim Oswald must have been running or had some sort of transporation and that's this;
What in the world could have possibly been so important to Oswald that he needed to get to a go-nowhere location as 10%/Patton (where he would stand out like a sore thumb) as quickly as he could? Apart from jogging, have you ever run to a place where there was nothing to do or see? And if he was tansported in a car, why not pick a location like Jefferson to be dropped of where there was a lot more activity (less chance of being noticed) and bus stops all over the place?
It's easier to hide in the open in a crowd of people than on an empty street, right?