No... it's the responsibility of someone making a "contrary" claim.
You guys (you and your cohorts) insist that various events in the historical record "did not happen".
You refuse to provide coherent, logical alternative explanations. That's why (by definition) you are game-playing contrarians.
No... it's the responsibility of someone making a "contrary" claim.So, it's guilty unless proven innocent? Please let me know when you prosecute your first case. I would love to be there and see the look on the judge's face when you take that position.... Should be good for a laugh or two....
It is of course total BS.... The claims are being made by you (and the WC).... So provide the evidence for them already!
You guys (you and your cohorts) insist that various events in the historical record "did not happen".Another strawman.... Nobody is insisting anything of the kind. We are actually asking you to prove that they did happen!
You refuse to provide coherent, logical alternative explanations. That's why (by definition) you are game-playing contrarians.Oh boy, more whining.... This is getting so tiresome. Oh well, it's an admission of defeat... at least that's something.