What a moronic, useless post.
LNers always resort to insults when their arguments fail.
I referred to Callaway on-camera in the CBS presentation "November 22nd The Warren Report". Did you watch the entire video?
Of course I did. I’ve watched the whole special. I’m trying to figure out why you seem to think that clips of people reiterating their testimonies makes your case any better than the original testimonies.
Ted Callaway heard shots from the porch of his business on Patton Street. Seconds later, he saw Oswald moving quickly carrying a gun "in the raised pistol position".
No, he saw a guy whom he later identified as Oswald in a biased, unfair lineup.
We're talking about a time frame of less than a minute between when Callaway heard the shots and when he saw the police officer lying on the ground near his squad car. And you call that "conjecture". The "direct knowledge" that a Police Officer was shot was available to Callaway in a matter of seconds after he heard the shots.
Yes, it’s conjecture. He didn’t see anybody shoot anybody. “Matter of seconds”. LOL. Exaggerate much?
Riddle me this, batman: if Callaway saw a guy trotting down Patton with a gun and could “logically consider” that the man shot the policeman then why did he ask Benavides which way he went?
Tell me John: Do you waste other people's time with such idiotic contrarianism or only on this forum?
I don’t know, Ross, do you waste people’s time elsewhere with insults and conjecture masquerading as evidence?
