Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The number four CT nightmare question ...  (Read 4118 times)

Offline Jorn Frending

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
The number four CT nightmare question ...
« on: April 13, 2020, 10:59:14 PM »
Advertisement
Oswald didn't "go to the movies" just because he "felt like it", why?

Despite that Oswald was indeed a person with great interest in politics he didn't care to watch the motorcade.

Despite shots were fired at the motorcade and that some claimed that the president had been shot, what does he do? He leaves Dealey Plaza without hanging around to find out more about what happend.

After having arrived back home only to leave again immediately, when leaving his room his landlady is watching the news. Yet he does not stop for even just a moment to know more about what happend

We know from his radio interviews that Oswald was knowledgeable on international affairs, that he was eloquent and knew how to handle loaded questions.

(Link to radio interviews:)


Kennedy had been standing up for civil rights for the "Freedom Riders" and received the socialist leader of Ghana which Oswald knew about. Whenever Oswald would have had time to gather so much information we don't know but one thing is certain, under "normal circumstances", Oswald would definitely have shown great interest in what happend that day.

His actions were not those of a TOTALLY innocent Oswald ...
« Last Edit: April 13, 2020, 11:57:22 PM by Jorn Frending »

JFK Assassination Forum

The number four CT nightmare question ...
« on: April 13, 2020, 10:59:14 PM »


Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2020, 11:56:30 PM »
A patsy is "in on it", whether he is aware of his role or gets double-crossed. Oswald acted exactly like a patsy from start to finish. Google "Thomas Arthur Vallee" (see my avatar) for Plan A. Oswald was Plan B.

As far as being an asset is concerned, Oswald was a singleton agent sheep-dipped in the fake defector program headed by James J. Angleton who was the Associate Deputy Director of Operations for Counterintelligence at the time. He took over for Allen Dulles after he got canned by JFK for his role in the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Dulles did not go quietly into the night and is the architect of the Big Event. Otherwise, what the hell was he doing on the WC? He was best buds with Angleton who extorted Hoover into the mix with a compromising photo. It was an easy sell, however, because Hoover was the defacto boss of the mafia and already hated JFK. They all hated JFK. The Big Event was officially "on" once Johnson got onboard. Watch "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" for more background.

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2020, 01:24:45 AM »
Watch "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" for more background.

Thats a very good series, even if you are on the LNer side or the CTer side.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2020, 01:24:45 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2020, 05:16:31 AM »
Whenever Oswald would have had time to gather so much information we don't know but one thing is certain, under "normal circumstances", Oswald would definitely have shown great interest in what happend that day.

His actions were not those of a TOTALLY innocent Oswald ...

I hate this argument, because it’s so utterly speculative.

Oswald was interested in politics, therefore this guy who has been an anti-social loner most of his life is all of a sudden going to start jabbering about the assassination with every stranger he runs into.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2020, 08:14:52 AM »
Oswald didn't "go to the movies" just because he "felt like it", why?

Despite that Oswald was indeed a person with great interest in politics he didn't care to watch the motorcade.

Despite shots were fired at the motorcade and that some claimed that the president had been shot, what does he do? He leaves Dealey Plaza without hanging around to find out more about what happend.

After having arrived back home only to leave again immediately, when leaving his room his landlady is watching the news. Yet he does not stop for even just a moment to know more about what happend

We know from his radio interviews that Oswald was knowledgeable on international affairs, that he was eloquent and knew how to handle loaded questions.

(Link to radio interviews:)


Kennedy had been standing up for civil rights for the "Freedom Riders" and received the socialist leader of Ghana which Oswald knew about. Whenever Oswald would have had time to gather so much information we don't know but one thing is certain, under "normal circumstances", Oswald would definitely have shown great interest in what happend that day.

His actions were not those of a TOTALLY innocent Oswald ...

"Despite that Oswald was indeed a person with great interest in politics he didn't care to watch the motorcade."

I guess you're 100% sure the prayer man isn't Ozzie?

"Despite shots were fired at the motorcade and that some claimed that the president had been shot, what does he do? He leaves Dealey Plaza without hanging around to find out more about what happend."

He's a recent defector back from the USSR and the FBI is on his azz. Whether that story is real or a cover I can't imagine he would want to stick around get mixed up and exposed in someone else's trouble.

"After having arrived back home only to leave again immediately, when leaving his room his landlady is watching the news. Yet he does not stop for even just a moment to know more about what happened"

Hmmmm I wonder why?
 
Lee Oswald's housekeeper (Earlene Roberts, right) and landlady (Gladys Johnson, left) photographed at Oswald's rooming house on the evening of the JFK assassination Courtesy Fort Worth Star-Telegram Collection, Special Collections Division, University of Texas at Arlington Libraries
« Last Edit: April 14, 2020, 08:29:30 AM by Gary Craig »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2020, 08:14:52 AM »


Offline Jorn Frending

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2020, 09:07:44 PM »
Thats a very good series, even if you are on the LNer side or the CTer side.

Hello Gerry, I may do so, however I remember vaguely having seen a more disputed part which I did not agree to. Anyway, other parts may me worthwhile watching.

Offline Jorn Frending

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2020, 09:11:37 PM »
I hate this argument, because it’s so utterly speculative.

Oswald was interested in politics, therefore this guy who has been an anti-social loner most of his life is all of a sudden going to start jabbering about the assassination with every stranger he runs into.

Hello John, you've quoted me but I'm not sure what you are referring to ...

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2020, 09:29:36 PM »
Hello John, you've quoted me but I'm not sure what you are referring to ...

That's not a quote but a summation of the argument.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The number four CT nightmare question ...
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2020, 09:29:36 PM »