Seeing that Oswald was involved in the conspiracy? Possible.
Seeing that there was a conspiracy and Oswald was innocent? That would be a hard sell.
Exactly. So now refer back to your original observation: "If you cannot be wrong then you are wrong".
Why would Oswald break his usual routine to visit his wife just Thursday night instead of visiting over the entire weekend? This only makes sense if he wanted to collect his rifle.
There are a lot of hypothetical things that would "make sense". Make up with Marina. Convince her to move in with him. Hell, even getting curtain rods makes sense. If you think the only possible reason for coming there on a non-Friday (not the first time he did so, BTW) was to get a rifle to kill the president with, then you are engaging in post-hoc rationalization.
Why did Oswald bring a long narrow package to work?
Apparently not that narrow. Again, you can make a case for many other things besides a hypothetical rifle in a bag for which there is no evidence.
Why would Oswald tell the young Wesley Buell Frazier that the long narrow package contained curtain rods when his room already had curtain rods.
Several possibilities. Maybe the room didn't really already have curtain rods. Mrs Johnson was photographed with another person hammering up curtain rods after the assassination. Maybe he wanted different curtain rods. Maybe the curtain rods were for the apartment Lee wanted to rent for Marina to come live with him. Maybe he lied to Frazier because he was embarrassed to air his martial strife to Frazier. Maybe Frazier made up the story to distance himself because Fritz was threatening to charge him as an accomplice. This notion that the only possible reason is getting a rifle to shoot the president with is fundamentally flawed.
Why when questioned by the police, did he deny bring in a long narrow package at all?
Maybe Frazier really was thinking of a different day. How would you know? Maybe the interrogation report wasn't accurate. By the way, the report doesn't say he denied bring in a long narrow package, it says that he "denied that he had brought the long package described by Mr. Frazier and his sister." But I'm sure Frazier and Randle didn't come into the interrogation room. How did they characterize what Frazier and Randle described? We don't know.
Oh, yes, I must assume that the police were lying about everything. And I should assume that Wesley Buell Frazier was lying as well.
You should assume nothing -- including that there was a rifle in the bag that Frazier saw.
Why was Oswald my himself during the shooting when almost everyone else was with others?
Why was Dougherty by himself during the shooting when almost everyone else was with others?
Why was Piper by himself during the shooting when almost everyone else was with others?
Why was Wilson by himself during the shooting when almost everyone else was with others?
Why was West by himself during the shooting when almost everyone else was with others?
Why was Hine by herself during the shooting when almost everyone else was with others?
How is it that Oswald just happened to run into his boss and the policeman on the second floor, right by the stairs, about where we would expect him to be if he was fleeing the sixth floor after the shooting?
The only reason that's where you "expect him to be" is because you think he did it and then rushed down the stairs in 75-90 seconds.
Why did Oswald immediately leave the building and Dealey Plaza in the few minutes after the shooting?
You don't know that he left the building in the few minutes after the shooting. All you can say is when he boarded the bus, and that isn't even certain. McWatters thought he was identifying the grinning teenager (Roy Milton Jones)
Why did the frugal Oswald take an American taxi, which he never did before, to rush back to his boardinghouse, when he could have walked there and didn’t expect to leave work for many hours.
This is evidence? Why did the frugal Oswald buy a rifle for $19.95? Why didn't the Oswald who had $13.87 in his pocket just buy a damn movie ticket and evade suspicion (if in fact he didn't)?
It makes sense if he unexpectedly got away and needed to get his handgun as soon as possible since the police could be showing up, maybe within the first hour.
You can fit all kinds of speculation into a predetermined conclusion and claim it makes sense.
Why did he sneak into the theater as police cars with sirens were coming down the street?
Nobody saw him "sneak into the theater".
How is it there just happened to be the murder of a police officer within a mile a 15 or so minutes before this happened?
How is it that John Gibson was in a movie theater a mile from where a police officer just happened to be murdered?
Why was Oswald carrying a handgun at the time he was arrested in the theater?
That's what boys do. On the other hand, why would somebody who had just shot a cop ditch a jacket, but not the gun? Here's the thing: hypothetical questions aren't evidence of anything.
Why would Oswald try to pull a handgun on the first police officer to approach him in the theater?
Why would you think he "tried to pull a handgun on a police officer"?
Oswald was part of a conspiracy? Maybe. Oswald was innocent? That is a very hard sell, regardless of whatever evidence turns up.
But is there anything that could possibly sell you, even in theory? Refer back to your premise.
Basically, there is no scenario that you can imagine that would cause you to change your mind that there probably was a conspiracy to instead believe that Oswald probably acted alone. Correct?
Incorrect. I never stated that I thought that there probably was a conspiracy. There isn't sufficient evidence to make that conclusion either.