Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read

[Michael Walton]

It sometimes helps to do the math.

Yes, it can help but not always. Go by what you can see in the film and watch the timing of it. The women witnesses said they yelled "over here" and he suddenly looks that way and waves to them. No shots yet. He goes behind the sign, reappears and the shots start just at that point.

[Walt Cakebread]

Tink had access to a good copy of the Zapruder film earlier than most others did. He found a way to make some money from that advantage. Time/Life sued him for using sketches of some of the frames in his book. It appears to me that Tink prematurely changed his opinion of what the Zapruder film shows based upon the rushed, and later shown to be flawed, acoustics study by the HSCA. He apparently laughs all the way to the bank after pandering to his audience by telling them what they want to hear...

I believe that Tink was correct in his evaluation of the head shot in his book SSID    ....   I'm dismayed that he displays blatant dishonesty in his presentation where he impressed the three gun shots on the Z film.    Anybody with one good eye and an ear can see that he has spaced the sounds of the shots evenly.....And he knows very well that 99% of the witnesses have said that the shots WERE NOT evenly spaced.    The vast majority of the ear witnesses said that the first shot sounded different than the two shots which followed after a shot pause.    IOW.... The sounds of the gun fire was  BOOM............  bang bang ......

I believe there were two shots that hit JFK's head just a split second apart.....and I'll have to review Tink's presentation about the skull fragment that was blown southward across the Lincoln and landed near the south curb of Elm street.....    It's not clear to me what point he's trying to make......

[John Iacoletti]

If it was a glancing strike on the right side of the head, how did a skull fragment end up on the left side of the car?

[Walt Cakebread]

Thanks for posting the Tink Thompson presentation......  I believe that Thompson is 100% correct in his final conclusion.....  He said that the more a person investigates the assassination the murkier it becomes.....  And I believe that is true IF a person can't see the reason that the case becomes more confused and murkier.... 

And that reason is because the conspirators and the investigators were one and the same.....  With J. Edgar Hoover at the controls.

[John Iacoletti]

IMO, the entire row of people on the north side of Elm street are unusually still.

[Walt Cakebread]

Here he explains how he made a mistake years ago:


Not a valid vimeo URL

Maybe your couple of points that you want to discuss are addressed in that video.

Charlie.....I'm having trouble playing the video .....  It stops at various points and won't restart.... I'd really like to see the entire video..... Is anybody else experiencing problems?

[Charles Collins]

IMO, the entire row of people on the north side of Elm street are unusually still.

Interesting observation, I think that could be due to an earlier missed shot that they heard and were mentally trying to figure out...

[Charles Collins]

Charlie.....I'm having trouble playing the video .....  It stops at various points and won't restart.... I'd really like to see the entire video..... Is anybody else experiencing problems?

It played fine for me yesterday. I do have a fast internet connection though. I’ll try again and if it is acting up for me now I’ll let you know. Otherwise, I will not respond.