Another pointless, essentially non-specific reply born out of a compulsion to attack for no good reason.
And there is your wishful thinking again..... speculative and worthless as always and only designed to not deal with what the witness actually said.
I dealt with it. The witness (Frazier) "estimated" the package to be 8 inches shorter than it would have to be if it contained the disassembled Carcano rifle. He described the way Oswald carried the package: Cupped in his hand and under the armpit. Due to human anatomy and physics, it was possible for the top of the package to protrude forward of the torso rather than be wedged in the armpit. The fact that Frazier did not consider this possibility is immaterial. It's possible for Frazier to be honest but honestly mistaken.
Only an unreasonable person considers his own conclusions to be reasonable.
Only? So you're saying it's impossible for a "reasonable" person to consider his own conclusions "reasonable". Explain that.
It's pretty pathetic to ignore what Frazier said and make up your own story instead, for which there is not a shred of evidence, and then call the conclusion reasonable.
It's not a "story". It's an explanation of how Oswald's long package (containing the disassembled Carcano) "could" have been carried and not be seen above LHO's shoulder--by Buell Frazier.
And there is your wishful thinking again..... speculative and worthless as always and only designed to not deal with what the witness actually said.
I dealt with it. The witness (Frazier) "estimated" the package to be 8 inches shorter than it would have to be if it contained the disassembled Carcano rifle. He described the way Oswald carried the package: Cupped in his hand and under the armpit. Due to human anatomy and physics, it was possible for the top of the package to protrude forward of the torso rather than be wedged in the armpit. The fact that Frazier did not consider this possibility is immaterial. It's possible for Frazier to be honest but honestly mistaken.
The only way you dealt with it is by dismissing it, without a shred of evidence, as an "estimate' and a "honest mistake". A description like "cupped in his hand and under his armpit" isn't an estimate. It's a pretty solid indicator of how long the package could have been. You don't like that, so you go back to the speculative "the package could have protruded forward" nonsense for which you have no evidence whatsoever.
Only an unreasonable person considers his own conclusions to be reasonable.
Only? So you're saying it's impossible for a "reasonable" person to consider his own conclusions "reasonable". Explain that.
The fact that you need this to have explained to you is telling. The answer to your question is; yes!
A reasonable person accepts the possibility that his opinion could be wrong. An unreasonable person feels that his opinion is not only reasonable but also the right one. You fit the latter category perfectly!
And now, I'm sure, you want to debate this point to demonstrate that your opinion is reasonable and the right one, right?
It's pretty pathetic to ignore what Frazier said and make up your own story instead, for which there is not a shred of evidence, and then call the conclusion reasonable.
It's not a "story". It's an explanation of how Oswald's long package (containing the disassembled Carcano) "could" have been carried and not be seen above LHO's shoulder--by Buell Frazier.
Of course it is a story and a fictional one at that. You start by assuming that the rifle was in the package and then you look for a way to explain how Oswald could have carried the package without Frazier seeing it. It's a story that was made up by Dan Rather and LNs have been using it ever since, but all it really is, is an self-serving assumption.
Faced with Frazier's testimony there are two ways to go;
(1) you accept the evidence for what it is, conclude that the package was too small to contain a broken down rifle and you look for another explanation for how the rifle ended up at the TSBD or
(2) you follow your own biased agenda, dismiss what the witness said and make up your own story to fit your own pre-determined narrative....
