Ok... I'll give it another try....
There must be some evidence that you like to look at and think about, right?
Why must I like some evidence?
The evidence is what it is. I have no preference one way or the other. Only people with a pre-determined conclusion and/or a bias think along the lines of liking evidence or not.
Get it now, dumbhead?
Marty,
You're either contradicting yourself, or you're saying you don't trust any of the evidence.
Which is it?
You're the one who suggested you believe in looking at the evidence and then making up your mind as to what you think it suggests.
Evidently you've made up your mind that Oswald was innocent.
How did you arrive at that conclusion if you don't "like" any of the (potentially) exculpatory evidence?
Because you think all of the evidence is untrustworthy, and therefore must have been fiddled with by The Bad Guys, and therefore there must have been a conspiracy?
Question: Do you think Oswald was a witting part of that conspiracy?
An unwitting "patsy"?
Just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
-- MWT