In other words you can't explain what's clever about the post to which I'm referring
To Wit:
#Rely#182 Weidmann
How would you know? You need a functional brain and at least some level of eduction to make such a determination. You've got neither.
> I'm not surprised that your qualifications for being 'clever' both begin & end with Ad Homs
I'm sorry that you don't understand this, but I was just making a factual statement. Asking what is clever about a factual statement is just dumb. If I could I would gladly explain it even better to you, but as I said before, I can't dumb things down any further to get to your level.
Btw, if you are going to quote me, it would be just a bit more honest when you provide the real and complete quote as well as the correct context. Here, I'll do it for you;
Your comment;
No chance of either of you ever saying something clever
I can see just how hard it is for you to write anything at all
You both have something in common with JFK: Head cavitation
my reply;
No chance of either of you ever saying something clever
How would you know?
You need a functional brain and at least some level of eduction to make such a determination. You've got neither.
And then the idiot complains about ad homs.... Go figure!