Now who's the neophyte? Anyone who has spent three minutes researching the case can clearly see that the Zapruder film indicates a shot from the right front. Clint Hill said there was a large hole in the back of the head. This is what he said before Specter and his bunch began intimidating witnesses. Are you going to tell us that the witnesses seeing and hearing gunshots from this location are liars or mistaken? The shot in the throat was not through the tie as you continually and falsely write. Not what Doctor Perry saw and he actually did the tracheotomy. All the Dallas doctors said the same thing: wound of entrance in the front, wound of exit in the back of the head. All of it totally opposite to your impossible scenarios. Can't wait to hear our ballistics genius tell me that entrance wounds are larger than exits. Black is white. Up is down. Please provide an innocent explanation for the Lee Bowers testimony. Are you telling us Holland, Simmons, and his crew were liars? When Dave Powers and Kenny O'Donnell finally fessed up and told the truth of what they actually heard that day from the follow-up car, I'm sure you will prefer to believe their sanitized testimony. What about the entire Willis family swearing there was at least one frontal shot? All liars, right?
The autopsy witnesses, except for that treasonous final report, told us of a massive wound in the back of the head, a wound in the upper back THAT DID NOT EXIT, and the throat wound, which looked somewhat like an exit following the tracheotomy. Yes, it's pretty clear this wound was tampered with at Bethesda and you will have to make Dr. Crenshaw a liar to deny this.
That's really just part of the story. I don't have all day to repeat this evidence that bugs May so much. Now we await the discrediting of witnesses with no motive to prevaricate...
