Your problem, Mr Mytton, is that I know the totality of the evidence better than you do!
Case in point! Mr Harold Norman told the HSCA that Mr Williams definitely got his lunch from the catering truck that day. This of course explains why he split off from Messrs Norman and Jarman after coming downstairs.
Mr Williams couldn't keep his story straight. That's why he's adding unnecessary detail in the portion of testimony you quote.
Keep trying, Mr Mytton. Maybe someday you might even get there!
Yawn, welcome to the party, you do realize that all this has been thoroughly examined, dissected and analysed ad nausea years ago in one of Colin Crow's multipart Chicken Bone threads.
Let me slow this down for you, on one hand we have the fresh memories of Williams himself telling us that he brought his lunch from home and agreeing that carrying his lunch was his usual habit and on the other hand we have someone else who wasn't Williams, who had no need to even visit the Lunch Truck that day recalling an insignificant event of what someone else ate for lunch and who wasn't actually there when Williams masticated his meal, and compounding this problem are that these vague memories of Williams buying lunch that Norman probably didn't even witness first hand are from a decade and a half earlier.
Mr. BALL. Did you bring your lunch from home that day?
Mr. NORMAN. Yes; I believe I did.Instead of looking at this through your usual heavily biased glasses, where you desperately cling to any sliver of self serving assumptions, why don't you put those World Famous deductive reasoning skills to the test and let's see where that takes you? Hmmm?
JohnM