A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.

[John Iacoletti]

Anyone notice that every time people get into a reasonable discussion about the details of the evidence, "Mytton" comes along and does his pigeons playing chess routine?

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald had provable identical behavioural patterns.

More LOLs.  "Mytton" knows more about Oswald's work pattern at J-C-S than Oswald's supervisor at J-C-S.

[John Mytton]

More BS.  You can't prove the authenticity of your evidence so you make up strawman conspirators, and try to shift the burden.  As usual.

LOL.  Waldman never saw or processed the original orders.  This "validated" microfilm just happens to conveniently disappear.

More BS.  You can't prove the authenticity of your evidence so you make up strawman conspirators, and try to shift the burden.  As usual.

Why are you running John, it was you who highlighted the passages in the McNally testimony regarding ease of forging and it was you who said anybody could stamp the paperwork, only a coward would make these suggestions and then try to back away, you're not a coward are you John?

LOL.  Waldman never saw or processed the original orders.

Waldmann gave the microfilm from Klein records, so how deep into Kliens is your conspiracy?

This "validated" microfilm just happens to conveniently disappear.

Your forgers already forged what was on the microfilm and could have simply forged all the records on the microfilm, so again where does this go?

JohnM

[John Mytton]

More LOLs.  "Mytton" knows more about Oswald's work pattern at J-C-S than Oswald's supervisor at J-C-S.

Oswald has a history of disappearing from different workplaces.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Anyone notice that every time people get into a reasonable discussion about the details of the evidence, "Mytton" comes along and does his pigeons playing chess routine?

Well if you can't handle the evidence, then that's your problem.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Why are you running John, it was you who highlighted the passages in the McNally testimony regarding ease of forging and it was you who said anybody could stamp the paperwork, only a coward would make these suggestions and then try to back away, you're not a coward are you John?

I'm not backing away from anything.  You seem to think that "Oswald's handwriting" is some solid fact.  It's not.

Waldmann gave the microfilm from Klein records, so how deep into Kliens is your conspiracy?

Actually the FBI confiscated it.  Then somebody "lost" it.  Too bad.  But they're from the government so they can be trusted.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald has a history of disappearing from different workplaces.

But not Jaggars Chiles Stovall.

[John Mytton]

I'm not backing away from anything.  You seem to think that "Oswald's handwriting" is some solid fact.  It's not.

Actually the FBI confiscated it.  Then somebody "lost" it.  Too bad.  But they're from the government so they can be trusted.

I'm not backing away from anything.

You're doing it again, your long lists of refuting each piece of individual evidence must go somewhere, why are you people so afraid to reap what you sow?

You seem to think that "Oswald's handwriting" is some solid fact.  It's not.

Either Oswald wrote it in a style and composition that he usually did or we can go down the path in this being just another part of evidence that needed to be manufactured for this rifle order.

Actually the FBI confiscated it.  Then somebody "lost" it.  Too bad.  But they're from the government so they can be trusted

Wow, besides your paranoia being embarrassingly on full display the above is just silly, in a case where your defence primarily relies on fakery of all sorts the ability to manufacture another microfilm would have been childs play and considering that both the WC and the HSCA came to the conclusion that the writing was Oswald's, what's next?

JohnM