Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.  (Read 75623 times)

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #176 on: November 01, 2018, 12:18:59 AM »
Advertisement
The WC was wrong on that point. JFK was clear of the oak tree when he was mid-way between the lamppost and the Thornton freeway sign on the north side of Elm St. :

The zfilm shows he was at that point at z195.

The WC should have paid attention to the Secret Service film made in early December 1963 which shows the tree as it appeared to Oswald in the SN. The spring foliage and additional branch growth shown in the  FBI re-enactment made in May 1964 was not there in November/63. The Secret Service film also shows that JFK was visible and easily tracked while passing under the tree (watch as the car passes in front of the TSBD and down Elm at 10:20-30:




You ought to get your eyes checked. The Z190s occur between the two orange lines above.

 



 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #176 on: November 01, 2018, 12:18:59 AM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2414
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #177 on: November 01, 2018, 12:29:24 AM »
Yes, correct Mr. Mason.

For persons who have the best, clearest Zapruder frames for study (I do), it is easy to see that JFK, very suddenly, superfast snaps his head  90 to 100 degrees  within only  3  Zapruder frames
 (equaling a superfast 0.16 second), from his looking  90 degrees to his direct right @ Z-203,  to his looking directly forward/a bit left of center by Z-206.

That same JFK  superfast head snap reaction (equaling a head snap superfast speed of 549 to 610 degrees per second)  that started @ Z-203/204 is,  without question,  JFK's first superfast response to his being first impacted with a bullet, at the latest,  @ Z-198/199.

Sorry. No head turn to full-forward, left alone one to the President's left.



Compare JFK's hairline in Z206 to Z225. No change.

 

Offline Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
    • SPMLaw
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #178 on: November 01, 2018, 03:16:49 AM »

You ought to get your eyes checked. The Z190s occur between the two orange lines above.
There are other ways to relate the Secret Service film to the zfilm.  You can time the car as it moves down Elm. You can relate the position to the painted road lane lines to the car position in both films. Or you can develop your own 3D model. In all cases the president is between the lamppost and the Thornton sign at z190 to z200. Using lane lines, in the SS film still that shows JFK visible to the SN, the position of JFK is opposite the end of the of the left lane line dash (third dash from the corner). That lane dash end point is just past a point that is directly opposite the lamppost (ie. on a line from the lamppost perpendicular to the curb).  So JFK is between the lamppost and the Thornton sign.  Projecting that onto a scale map of Dealey Plaza as I have done shows that JFK was at that point at z195.

Your lines are not perpendicular to the street curb.  The car is following the street direction so the parts of the car that are perpendicular to the car's direction (eg. the front, back, windshield) are perpendicular to the curbs:


Since the road-perpendicular line from the back of JFK's position in the photo crosses the lamp post at a point that is higher above the ground than the line is above the car, this means that the back of JFK is AHEAD of the lamp post.  Since it crosses below the foot of the Thornton Freeway sign, it is before that sign.  The road-perpendicular line from the front of the car crosses the Thornton sign at about the foot of the sign post, so the front of the car is just behind the Thornton Freeway sign (i.e. the line which passes just above the top of the hood crosses the sign at a point that is lower in relation to the sign).  The distance from the front of that car to JFK's position is likely about 10 feet. JFK, therefore, is ahead of the lamp post and at least 10 feet from the sign.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2018, 05:04:34 PM by Andrew Mason »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #178 on: November 01, 2018, 03:16:49 AM »


Offline Martin Hinrichs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #179 on: February 08, 2019, 03:09:31 PM »
After all this fighting years i'am willing to say that the SBT Theory is possible. Both acting at the same time as one bullet hit them. Whether it came from.
I was not willing to allow it in my head.

Not easy to say it.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #180 on: February 09, 2019, 05:25:23 PM »
After all this fighting years i'am willing to say that the SBT Theory is possible. Both acting at the same time as one bullet hit them. Whether it came from.
I was not willing to allow it in my head.

Not easy to say it.

             (1) The SBT being attached to CE399 destroys the SBT (2) The SBT Trajectory of a bullet fired at a Downward angle: (1) Entering the back of JFK roughly 5" below the shoulder, and (2) Exiting at the Neck just below the adams apple also destroys the SBT.

« Last Edit: February 09, 2019, 05:26:33 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #180 on: February 09, 2019, 05:25:23 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #181 on: February 10, 2019, 11:18:46 AM »
             (1) The SBT being attached to CE399 destroys the SBT (2) The SBT Trajectory of a bullet fired at a Downward angle: (1) Entering the back of JFK roughly 5" below the shoulder, and (2) Exiting at the Neck just below the adams apple also destroys the SBT.

That's your SBT, not the real SBT. The real SBT works just fine. CE-399, traveling at a downward angle,  entered the back of JFK's neck at about the level of C7 and exited his throat at about the level of C7.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2775
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #182 on: February 10, 2019, 03:45:06 PM »
That's your SBT, not the real SBT. The real SBT works just fine. CE-399, traveling at a downward angle,  entered the back of JFK's neck at about the level of C7 and exited his throat at about the level of C7.

     By "real SBT" you mean "Gerry Ford's  BS: SBT". Gerry's Chicanery also Mandates that everyone "pay No attention to the man behind the curtain" = (1) The JFK Autopsy Back Photo(s), (2) The JFK Autopsy Face Sheet, (3) The Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Coat, and (4) The Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Shirt.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #183 on: February 11, 2019, 01:01:45 AM »
     By "real SBT" you mean "Gerry Ford's  BS: SBT". Gerry's Chicanery also Mandates that everyone "pay No attention to the man behind the curtain" = (1) The JFK Autopsy Back Photo(s), (2) The JFK Autopsy Face Sheet, (3) The Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Coat, and (4) The Bullet Hole in JFK's Dress Shirt.

Nope, not Gerry Ford's. Ford had nothing to do with the SBT. He never added a single thing to it. CTs lie about Ford. They falsely claim that he moved the wound. The truth is that he never moved the wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.

The man behind the curtain is a tinfoil hatter hallucination. The autopsy photos show that the wound was a mere 5.5 cm below a crease in the neck and that it was above the wound in the throat. The notations on the Face Sheet  give the position of the wound. The jacket and shirt were both bunched up at the time of the shot and thus cannot be used to determine the position of the wound.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #183 on: February 11, 2019, 01:01:45 AM »