Try reading the tread. Your chin argument is addressed on the first page.
You still have not read the chapter on the backyard photos, have you? Did you miss the part about the discovery of DPD backyard rifle photos in 1992, one of which shows a white silhouette where Oswald's body was later pasted, and another of which shows a DPD detective striking the same pose seen in the third photo? Did you miss that? Now, gosh gully gulp, can you tell me why the DPD would have taken and manipulated such pictures?
Even the
Houston Post (February 9, 1992) acknowledged that "One photo of Oswald's backyard in the Oak Cliff section of Dallas shows clear evidence of darkroom manipulation" and that this manipulation involved "attempts to frame Oswald by 'inserting' him into the background" of the picture. Did you miss all that? You and your fellow true believers are about 30 years behind the information curve.
Anyway, regrading the chin issue, anyone with eyes who is willing to use them can look at those photos and see that the chin is noticeably different from Oswald's chin in genuine photos of him. British photographic expert Malcolm Thompson rejected the HSCA photographic panel's labored attempt to deny the chin problem.
You are still avoiding addressing the information that I posted. Here it is again: [SNIP]
SMH. That well-known and misused memo proves nothing, and in fact only raises more questions.
For the record, there was a credible chain of evidence for the print.
Not on this planet. You must be kidding. Lt. Day "failed" to take a single photograph of the print, even though he took several photos of the partial prints on the trigger guard. When the DPD handed over all the physical evidence on the night of 11/22, Lt. Day said nothing about having found a palmprint on the barrel (which print, by the way, was allegedly "found" beneath the foregrip, i.e.,
on a part of the barrel that a gunman could not have touched while firing the rifle). When Latona got the rifle at FBI HQ, he found no trace of a print on the barrel, even though Lt. Day later claimed that the print was still visible after he did his lift. Moreover, Latona said he found no trace of any attempt to even process the barrel for prints; in other words, he could see no evidence that anyone had tried to detect/lift a print on/from the barrel.
And you realize that the palmprint did not arrive to the FBI until November 29, right? You know that, right? Why the seven-day delay in sending the most crucial piece of evidence that the DPD supposedly found, whereas all the prints were sent, and arrived, before then? Hey? What was the holdup? And why didn't the DPD rush to announce the finding of the palmprint as soon as it was found? Why the long delay?
This is your idea of a "credible chain of evidence"?
