Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Free Book Now Available -- Hasty Judgment: Why the JFK Case Is Not Closed  (Read 45781 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Advertisement
For anyone who might be interested, I have decided to stop selling my book Hasty Judgment: Why the JFK Case Is Not Closed and to make it available free of charge online in PDF format. The book is my reply to Gerald Posner's book Case Closed. The book includes the transcript of my interview with an NSA photographic technician regarding the backyard rifle photos. Here's the link to the book:

https://miketgriffith.com/files/hastyjudgmentbook.pdf

Brennan is no more discredited than Carolyn Arnold.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
For anyone who might be interested, I have decided to stop selling my book Hasty Judgment: Why the JFK Case Is Not Closed and to make it available free of charge online in PDF format. The book is my reply to Gerald Posner's book Case Closed. The book includes the transcript of my interview with an NSA photographic technician regarding the backyard rifle photos. Here's the link to the book:

https://miketgriffith.com/files/hastyjudgmentbook.pdf

The palm print was lifted off the rifle by Carl Day on Nov 22, 1963. He was both authorized and qualified to do so. FBI agent Pinkston was aware on Nov 22 that Day had noticed a latent print of the rifle. The FBI lab specialists would later confirm that the print had indeed been lifted off of the barrel of Oswald's rifle.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
For anyone who might be interested, I have decided to stop selling my book Hasty Judgment: Why the JFK Case Is Not Closed and to make it available free of charge online in PDF format. The book is my reply to Gerald Posner's book Case Closed. The book includes the transcript of my interview with an NSA photographic technician regarding the backyard rifle photos. Here's the link to the book:

https://miketgriffith.com/files/hastyjudgmentbook.pdf





JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
For anyone who might be interested, I have decided to stop selling my book Hasty Judgment: Why the JFK Case Is Not Closed and to make it available free of charge online in PDF format. The book is my reply to Gerald Posner's book Case Closed. The book includes the transcript of my interview with an NSA photographic technician regarding the backyard rifle photos. Here's the link to the book:

https://miketgriffith.com/files/hastyjudgmentbook.pdf

How have you determined that more fragments were recovered from Governor Connally's wrist alone than are missing from CE 399?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Carl Day didn’t photograph the alleged print, or cover it with cellophane like he did with the others, even though he had time to do so. He was told to turn over all the evidence to Vince Drain, but didn’t turn this over or even notify Drain of its existence. Day claimed that there were still traces left on the rifle. Latona didn’t learn of the existence of this print until Nov. 29 when it arrived on an index card, sent separately from anything else. Latona found no traces of the print or even any indication that the area had been processed. Hoover claimed that 5 spots on the lift were matched to “pits” on the rifle, but all we have is a smudge with lines drawn on it, nor is there any documentation or report from who did the match and how it was done. Or even any communication with Day as to exactly where the lift was taken to see if they were “matching” to the same spot. Drain told Henry Hurt that he didn’t think it was legitimate.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2020, 01:45:44 AM by John Iacoletti »

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
For anyone who might be interested, I have decided to stop selling my book Hasty Judgment: Why the JFK Case Is Not Closed and to make it available free of charge online in PDF format. The book is my reply to Gerald Posner's book Case Closed. The book includes the transcript of my interview with an NSA photographic technician regarding the backyard rifle photos. Here's the link to the book:

https://miketgriffith.com/files/hastyjudgmentbook.pdf

Canning didn't have to assume that Connally was positioned so far to the left that his right shoulder was practically in the middle of the jump seat. The ITEK film and photographic analysis determined that Connally was positioned as far as that to the left. Canning just went with the ITEK numbers.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Itek analyzed Z frames 183 and 186, and gave an over 4-inch range on how inboard Connally was from Kennedy.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2020, 01:48:47 AM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Carl Day didn’t photograph the alleged print, or cover it with cellophane like he did with the others, even though he had time to do so. He was told to turn over all the evidence to Vince Drain, but didn’t turn this over or even notify Drain if it’s existence. Day claimed that there were still traces left on the rifle. Latona didn’t learn of the existence of this print until No. 29 when it was arrived on and index card, sent separately from anything else. Latina found no traces of the print or even any indication that the area had been processed. Hoover claimed that 5 spots on the lift were matched to “pits” on the rifle, but all we have is a smudge with lines drawn on it, nor is there any documentation as to who did the match and how it was done. Or even any communication with Day as to exactly where the lift was taken to see if they were “matching” to the same spot. Drain told Henry Hurt that he didn’t think it was legitimate.

Drain told Larry Sneed that he believed Carl Day was an honest man.

JFK Assassination Forum