The Wounding of James Tague Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory

[John Tonkovich]

How does their testimony trump the official autopsy that includes supporting photographs and x-rays?

JohnM

Have you read their testimony?
Are you aware their 302's were not included in the Warren Report, and only discovered in 1966?
"It was in the hairline." 
I'm sure a smart guy like you can figure it out.

[John Mytton]

Have you read their testimony?
Are you aware their 302's were not included in the Warren Report, and only discovered in 1966?
"It was in the hairline." 
I'm sure a smart guy like you can figure it out.

I'll ask again, how does their observations trump an official autopsy with supporting photos and x-rays?

JohnM

[Gerry Down]

I'll ask again, how does their observations trump an official autopsy with supporting photos and x-rays?

JohnM

The x-rays could be faked. Dr. Mantik said it looked like there was an unnatural white blotch at the back of the head on the sideways x-ray of JFKs head.

[John Tonkovich]

I'll ask again, how does their observations trump an official autopsy with supporting photos and x-rays?

JohnM

Have you read their observations?

[Michael T. Griffith]

How does their testimony trump the official autopsy that includes supporting photographs and x-rays?JohnM

Did you write this reply in the 1970s and just forget to hit Post until today? You know we have hard scientific evidence that the skull x-rays have been altered, right? Have you heard about the optical density analyses that have been done on the x-rays?

And the "official autopsy" was done by three unqualified pathologists, two of whom had never done a gunshot wound autopsy and the third of whom had not done an autopsy in years.

If you have not read the evidence and research regarding the alteration of the autopsy materials, it will take you several months to catch up. Here are some good sources to get you started--some of them are videos, to give you a break from reading:

https://kennedysandking.com/images/pdf/michael-chesser-houston-2017.pdf
http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2009/11/doug-horne.html
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/jfk-autopsy-x-rays-david-mantik-vs-pat-speer
https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/altered-history-exposing-deciet-and-deception-in-the-jfk-assassination-medical-evidence-part-1/

https://themantikview.com/pdf/The_JFK_Autopsy_Materials.pdf

https://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong.htm

[Gary Craig]

James W. Sibert was one of two FBI agents who witnessed President Kennedy's autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital on the night of November 22, 1963. Sibert is interviewed here by C-SPAN Radio on June 30th, 2005.

[Tim Nickerson]

Did you write this reply in the 1970s and just forget to hit Post until today? You know we have hard scientific evidence that the skull x-rays have been altered, right? Have you heard about the optical density analyses that have been done on the x-rays?

The autopsy photos and X-Rays were confirmed as authentic by the HSCA's 21 member panel of photographic analysis experts and by the HSCA Medical panel. The photos were authenticated by the photographer who took them and the X-Rays were authenticated by the radiologist responsible for them as well as by the technician who took them.

Ebersole testified that the X-Rays in the National Archives are the ones that he supervised the taking of just prior to the start of the autopsy on Kennedy. He positively identified them. As Jerrol Custer noted "the technician takes the X-Rays. The Radiologist reads the X-Rays. Plain and simple."  Custer believed that the X-Rays were genuine. He was shown three X-Rays of the skull during his ARRB testimony and he confirmed that he had taken them. Those X-Rays were (1),(2),and (3) in the list below.

https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md13/html/Image01.htm

[Tim Nickerson]

Walthers mentioned that he had seen bullet strikes on curbs before. Also, the mark was deep enough, had enough substance missing, that Walthers assumed it could have been the source of the fragment that stung Tague and cut his face. And, the first photos did in fact show material missing from the mark--it was not just a smudge.

"These metal smears were spectrographically determined to be essentially lead with a trace of antimony. No copper was found. The lead could have originated from the lead core of a mutilated metal-jacketed bullet such as the type of bullet loaded into 6.5 millimeter Mannlicher-Carcano cartridges or from some other source having the same composition.

The absence of copper precluded the possibility that the mark on the curbing section was made by an unmutilated military-type full metal-jacketed bullet such as the bullet from Governor Connally's stretcher, C1, or the bullet or bullets represented by the jacket fragments, c2 and c3, found in the Presidential limousine. Further, the damage to the curbing would have been much more extensive if a rifle bullet had struck the curbing without first having struck some other object. Therefore, this mark could not have been made by the first impact of a high velocity rifle bullet."

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62372#relPageId=126&tab=page