Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

Explain this:

The 11/24/63 report on Oswald's interrogation by Special Agent Bookhout contains the following:

"Oswald stated that on November 22, 1963, at the time of the search of the Texas School Book
Depository building by Dallas police officers, he was on the second floor of said building,
having just purchased a Coca-Cola from the soft-drink machine, at which time a police officer
came into the room with pistol drawn and asked him if he worked there. Mr. Truly was present
and verified that he was an employee and the police officer thereafter left the room and
continued through the building. Oswald stated that he took this Coke down to the first floor
and stood around and had lunch in the employees’ lunch room."

Why does Oswald have a coke in this version of the 'hoax' but it disappears by the time Baker and Truly testify before the WC?

You say Nat Pinkston was involved, what do you have to back this up?
You say the hoax was developed by "the 'investigating' authorities, after the assassination". What do you have to back this up?

More Fantasia.

Yawn. The evolution of the interrogation reports has been covered in great detail multiple times in multiple venues since 2013, Mr O'Meara. But you wouldn't know that, seeing as you're stuck in 2010. Educate yourself, man!

[Alan Ford]

If PM is Oswald, why did not the conspirators blacken out that west corner using the same whatever black masking that is alleged by Mr. Ford to be creating a shadow on the side of Lovelady!

I'm not alleging it, Mr Mason, I'm stating the plain fact. If you disagree as to its being a plain fact, do feel free offer your own explanation of how that can be a real shadow.



I, Mr Zeon Mason, have an explanation for the shadow down Mr Lovelady's right side in Wiegman: _________________________________________ 

Over to you, sir!

[Alan Ford]

Here's a challenge for all of you who believe the 2FLRE was a hoax.

In proposing the Hoax you are proposing something 'real'. It must have been created by someone - who was it created by? Who is orchestrating the Hoax? It must have participants - who is involved in the Hoax and to what extent?
How did the Hoax come into being?
What is the timeline for it?

You have reached into thin air and pulled out a new reality called the 2FLRE Hoax. Defend it. Prove it exists as a thing in it's own right.
If you believe in the 2FLRE Hoax don't just sit in the shadows waiting for these awkward questions to go away so you can just carry on believing it without any proof of it's reality.
Get your heads together.
Come up with something concrete.

More cope, lol

[Zeon Mason]

If Lovelady flannel shirt hanging loosely ,  then possibly  the wind gusts of 15mph  at the time could have moved the loose shirt hanging on his right side outward in a way to create an shadow from the shirt.

Also, if his right arm is moved outward with elbow bent, it might cause additional shadow on his right.side.

I don’t a have a computer shadow program Nor have I have made a scale model of the front entrance and placed some adjustable figurines , so it’s only a reasoned speculation I’m
Offering here.

If someone has the shadow analysis graphics  program, please feel free to test the bent arm/elbow possible positions  and the shirt side moved outward farther from the right side of the body.

I’ve seen some previous computer shadow analysis in another thread that may be still here, however it was positioning a body with right arm hanging straight down near to the body and shirt as tucked.

[Dan O'meara]

Yawn. The evolution of the interrogation reports has been covered in great detail multiple times in multiple venues since 2013, Mr O'Meara. But you wouldn't know that, seeing as you're stuck in 2010. Educate yourself, man!

As usual, not a single point answered.
I know there's no point in asking this but why don't you just give a quick overview of how the "evolution of the interrogation reports" relates to the creation of the 2FLRE Hoax.
And, if you have time, have a go at some of the points raised by your own assertions that you seem unable to back up.
For example, how is Nat Pinkston involved? You brought this up so you must have a reason for doing so.

[Alan Ford]

If Lovelady flannel shirt hanging loosely ,  then possibly  the wind gusts of 15mph  at the time could have moved the loose shirt hanging on his right side outward in a way to create an shadow from the shirt.

Certainly a novel suggestion, Mr Mason! Unfortunately, it's DOA. The Wiegman frames showing Mr Lovelady on the upper step should help you to see why...

Also, if his right arm is moved outward with elbow bent, it might cause additional shadow on his right.side.

Good luck getting all this shadow from a right arm moved outward with elbow bent, lol

[Dan O'meara]

Isn't he just partly in shadow?

[Frederick Clements]

 If it isn't Oswald why is NBC refusing to release the original Weigman and Darnell films? What are they trying to hide?


Fred