Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

Isn't he just partly in shadow?

 

[Zeon Mason]

Is there any way possible that the original film PM figure was darkened purposely  by overexposing a copy of the film  to hide PM figure?

If so, then the  shadow anomaly of Lovelady may be due to the Lovelady figure being cut and pasted from a position originally IN shadow (nearer west wall) to a position closer to the center hand rail. The conspirators did not attempt to remove the shadow as it was not deemed that anyone would likely notice the discrepancy, and the process to remove shadow perhaps considered  too risky  to do without leaving signs of alteration.

 
What would be the purpose , however to move Lovelady image if the conspirators had darkened the PM figure in fear it might be Oswald?

If there was NOT any alteration of the original film version of the PM figure, and the conspirators therefore unaware the PM figure may  resemble Oswald, then the purpose to move or add shadow to Lovelady must be due to some OTHER face/figure that was identified in the original film that the conspirators thought resembled Oswald.

Or if not Oswald , then whom else would the conspirators have thought it necessary to mask over with shadow added or by moving Lovelady image?

[Zeon Mason]

Is there any way possible that the original film PM figure was darkened purposely  by overexposing a copy of the film  to hide PM figure?

If so, then the  shadow anomaly of Lovelady may be due to the Lovelady figure being cut and pasted from a position originally IN shadow (nearer west wall) to a position closer to the center hand rail. The conspirators did not attempt to remove the shadow as it was not deemed that anyone would likely notice the discrepancy, and the process to remove shadow perhaps considered  too risky  to do without leaving signs of alteration.

 
What would be the purpose , however to move Lovelady image if the conspirators had darkened the PM figure in fear it might be Oswald?

If there was NOT any alteration of the original film version of the PM figure, and the conspirators therefore unaware the PM figure may  resemble Oswald, then the purpose to move or add shadow to Lovelady must be due to some OTHER face/figure that was identified in the original film that the conspirators thought resembled Oswald.

Or if not Oswald , then whom else would the conspirators have thought it necessary to mask over with shadow added or by moving Lovelady image?

[Zeon Mason]

Sorry that got double posted. May the moderator feel free remove the redundant post as I am unable to do so

[Alan Ford]

If there was NOT any alteration of the original film version of the PM figure, and the conspirators therefore unaware the PM figure may  resemble Oswald, then the purpose to move or add shadow to Lovelady must be due to some OTHER face/figure that was identified in the original film that the conspirators thought resembled Oswald.

Or if not Oswald , then whom else would the conspirators have thought it necessary to mask over with shadow added or by moving Lovelady image?

Now we're getting places, Mr Mason.

I have previously wondered whether the someone else might not have been Mr Ken Duvall or Ms Carolyn Arnold...

However, what if what's being masked over is not someONE but someTHING-----------a something that, directly or indirectly, is somehow related to the question of Mr Oswald's whereabouts?

Ask yourself: what, most obviously, would the unshadowed image of Mr Lovelady have shown?

Answer: his right arm.

And along with that? The fact that he was wearing a long-sleeved shirt with sleeves not rolled up.



So what? Well, cf the blowup of Altgens 6 that Mr Walter Cronkite showed the nation the evening of the assassination:



We see Mr Lovelady here (and yes, it is Mr Lovelady, not Mr Oswald!), but is that really Mr Lovelady's left arm we're seeing in front of him? What if it's not? And if not, what might it actually be?

(Remember: Altgens 6 is taken several seconds before the first Wiegman frame of that doorway!)

[Zeon Mason]

Not sure what Mr Ford is suggesting as to some object needing to be blackened out  beside Lovelady.

My speculation is that it was necessary to hide black suit white tie man that is in Altgens 6 seemingly just behind Lovelady, yet his white shirt looks likes like it overlaps Lovelady left shoulder, in fact appears to be chopping off the upper shoulder.

I’ve read more that “Fedora” hat man is allegedly Mr Truly captured in Althens 6 but he is obscured by the woman seemingly holding a young boy with the Toboggan cap. The CT researcher suggesting that image of woman and child is fake and added after the white shirt and tie portion of Mr Truly was cut and pasted in to represent Mr Shellys alleged location at the top of the entrance steps.

If so, then would this would be to hide Oswald at a position BETWEEN Prayerblob and BW Frazier.

If Mr Ford is adamantly still of the opinion that PM is Oswald, then I’m
Still at a loss to explain these photographic “quirks” to cover up some one or some THING?

[Alan Ford]

Not sure what Mr Ford is suggesting as to some object needing to be blackened out  beside Lovelady.

I am suggesting that Mr Lovelady's covered, sleeved right arm is what needed to be blackened out.

(...)

If Mr Ford is adamantly still of the opinion that PM is Oswald, then I’m
Still at a loss to explain these photographic “quirks” to cover up some one or some THING?

I am suggesting that Mr Lovelady's sleeved right arm needed to be blackened out in Wiegman because they needed folks to believe that they were seeing his unsleeved left arm in Altgens---------when in fact that 'unsleeved left arm' of Mr Lovelady in Altgens was something else entirely:



Once again: remember that the Altgens photograph was taken several seconds before the first Wiegman frames of that doorway.

[Zeon Mason]

It looks like a forearm imo, which is the left arm and if you can identify anything that is reflecting light at the wrist area, then it could be Oswalds shiny bracelet he wore on his Left hand as indicated in a photo of him in handcuffs