No----the lack of consistency is entirely in the reports made of what he said. Remember: Inspector Kelley and Agent Bookhout are reporting on one and the same session, which they both attended! Does either of them indicate that Mr Oswald gave two completely different answers in that session?
It is possible they weren't both there at the same time or the whole time. Very similar statements though. They are consistent in regards to the claim of the presence of coworkers he is attempting to use as an alibi. What he admits to is the lunchroom encounter taking place on the second floor before he ate his lunch in the presence of the coworkers. An event he eventually states happened after he came down the stairs to see what the commotion was about. An event he eventually claims happened after the assassination not before. By the end of his interrogation little doubt he is making stories up about his whereabouts during the assassination.
Agent Bookhout, 11/23 interrogation report:
"OSWALD stated that on November 22, 1963, he had eaten lunch in the lunch room at the Texas School Book Depository, alone, but recalled possibly two Negro employees walking through the room during this period.
He stated possibly one of these employees was called 'Junior' and the other was a short individual whose name he could not recall but whom he would be able to recognize.
He stated that his lunch consisted of a cheese sandwich and an apple..."
Inspector Kelley, 11/23 interrogation report:
"He said he ate his lunch with the colored boys who worked with him.
He described one of them as 'Junior', a colored boy, and the other was a little short negro boy. He said his lunch consisted of cheese, bread, fruit, and apples..."
