Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Richard Smith]

Oswald himself admitting to being in the building.

I know that Oswald said to reporters he worked in the building, but where and when exactly did he say he was in the building at the time of the shooting?

He was specifically asked if he was in the building at the time of the shooting.

[Martin Weidmann]

He was specifically asked if he was in the building at the time of the shooting.

No he wasn't.

Oswald: I work in that building
Reporter: Were you in the building at the time
Oswald: Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir

What else was he going to say?

It doesn't get anymore vague than this, yet to Richard it's an admission that he was in the building during the shooting. Hilarious!

To more reasonable people it's obvious that Oswald simply confirmed that he worked at the TSBD and that he was there when the shooting took place.

[Zeon Mason]

Ok, I’m on board with Mr.Fords latest scenario with exception of conspirators pasting image of Jones over Lewis to hide the bottle , which it does not really do imo.

Im not sure they did anything to the Cronkite version because at that point in time they probably were not yet aware of the significance of the bottle in the hand. It may be the Cronkite news show display that case guy someone’s attention.

It’s definitely a different picture later as the arm is covered up with texture pattern of Lovelady and the bottle had disappeared , nothing but Lovelady white shirt in full.

I think the main selling point here is the impossibility of the red blotches in Hughes all belonging to just one person because how far apart they are.

There’s only 2 possibilities to explain the red blotches in Hughes so far apart.

1. There were 2 persons wearing reddish shirts in proximity to each other

2. There was only 1 person with reddish shirt and the anomaly is caused by motion blur or some other phenomenon caused by the camera itself.

If 1 is the reason, then what other person out there would have a reddish shirt that would register approx same red tone and also what person would be in proximity to Lovelady so as to be captured in the Hughes (thru the tree foliage)?

Since I’m no expert on cameras of this 1963 era and if they had motion blur effects , some one else may be able to offer some more detailed explanation for no.2

Also, it would be nice if some kind of high tech computer imaging analysis program can determine the probability of the reddish shirt to be Loveladys plaid red shirt with black squares or if the shirt is more probable to be solid reddish texture like Oswald’s shirt.

[Alan Ford]

No he wasn't.

Oswald: I work in that building
Reporter: Were you in the building at the time
Oswald: Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir

What else was he going to say?

It doesn't get anymore vague than this, yet to Richard it's an admission that he was in the building during the shooting. Hilarious!

To more reasonable people it's obvious that Oswald simply confirmed that he worked at the TSBD and that he was there when the shooting took place.

Mr. Oswald considered the enclosed entranceway to be part of the building (which it of course was)-------------hence he was in the building (though not inside) at the time of the shooting.

We know from Agent Hosty's 11/22 draft interrogation report that Mr. Oswald said he went "outside to watch P. Parade."

In the building YET outside= contradiction in terms, surely? Yes----------------for everywhere EXCEPT the front entranceway

So-------------------Mr. Smith can bring out this old chestnut as many times as he likes, it still won't get him anywhere. Perhaps he might more profitably turn his attention instead to the problem of explaining how Reddish-Shirted Man in Hughes can possibly be Mr. Lovelady? If he actually gets anywhere (miracles do happen), then I'll be so astonished by his feat I might just be inspired to notify his favorite newspaper, the New York Times. Now that would be a story!

'Do you remember where you were when you heard that Mr. Richard Smith had made a meaningful contribution to the JFK assassination debate?'

 

[Alan Ford]

Ok, I’m on board with Mr.Fords latest scenario with exception of conspirators pasting image of Jones over Lewis to hide the bottle , which it does not really do imo.

To hide where the bottle crosses Mr. Lovelady's white tshirt.

The addition of Mr. Jones' face from Cronkite Altgens to Canonical Altgens achieves just that:

------------->

 

[Alan Ford]

I think the main selling point here is the impossibility of the red blotches in Hughes all belonging to just one person because how far apart they are.

Do you mean in Bell, Mr. Mason?

Not sure I see any problem here. Look at the width of Ms. Maddie Reese (in white), and compare Mr. Lovelady:



 

[Richard Smith]

No he wasn't.

Oswald: I work in that building
Reporter: Were you in the building at the time
Oswald: Naturally, if I work in that building, yes sir

What else was he going to say?

It doesn't get anymore vague than this, yet to Richard it's an admission that he was in the building during the shooting. Hilarious!

To more reasonable people it's obvious that Oswald simply confirmed that he worked at the TSBD and that he was there when the shooting took place.

Vague?  HA HA HA HA.  You literally have the question and answer on film.  You don't even need the time machine.  He was specifically asked if he was in the building AT THE TIME.  And Oswald responds "Yes."   What do you mean "what else was he going to say"?  How about "no" if that was the case.  If he was out on the street AT THE TIME, as this endless thread has suggested, then a perfect opportunity to say so.  Unreal.

LEE HARVEY OSWALD — “I work in that building.”

REPORTER — “Were you in the building at the time?”

LEE HARVEY OSWALD — “Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, sir.”

[Alan Ford]

Vague?  HA HA HA HA.  You literally have the question and answer on film.  You don't even need the time machine.  He was specifically asked if he was in the building AT THE TIME.  And Oswald responds "Yes."   What do you mean "what else was he going to say"?  How about "no" if that was the case.  If he was out on the street AT THE TIME, as this endless thread has suggested, then a perfect opportunity to say so.  Unreal.

And there we have it, straight from the Warren Gullible's own mouth: Mr. Oswald's answer makes no sense if he was out on the street at the time.

There'll be no argument from me on that point!

Poor Mr. Smith has of course just blown up his own argument. He thinks---------he actually thinks!---------the man in the reddish shirt in Hughes is out on the street.

Why does poor Mr. Smith think this? Because he thinks---------he actually thinks!----------the enclosed front entrance belongs to the street rather than to the building!

No wonder he's lost!