Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2  (Read 471168 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4488 on: December 27, 2021, 12:40:13 AM »
Advertisement
CNN analyst exposes MAGA's 'Let's Go Brandon' slur: 'It is fundamentally about insurrection'



CNN political analyst Ron Brownstein noted over the weekend that the popular "Let's Go Brandon" slur against President Joe Biden is "fundamentally about insurrection."

Brownstein made the observation after a father shouted "Let's Go Brandon" at Biden on a Christmas-themed telephone call.

The phrase has been widely used as a substitute for "F--k Joe Biden."

"It's ungracious, it's juvenile, it's reprehensible by the father [who spoke to Biden]," Brownstein explained on Friday. "But I don't think it's fundamentally about incivility; I think it is fundamentally about insurrection."

"The whole 'Let's Go Brandon' kind of motif is a reflection of the view of two-thirds of the Republican base driven by Trump's false claims and the Big Lie that Biden is an illegitimate president," he added.

Brownstein said that the phrase also reflected two polls that found many Republicans believe that force will be needed to "save" the country.

"This is a manifestation of not just incivility, but of the fundamental view of the illegitimacy and the ominous shores that we're kind of sailing toward very quickly in 2022 and especially 2024," he concluded.

Watch the video clip below from CNN:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4488 on: December 27, 2021, 12:40:13 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4489 on: December 27, 2021, 01:39:37 PM »
Trump supporters paid former Texas police captain over $200k for help in stealing the election: report

A  former police captain was reportedly paid more than $200,000 to "hunt ballots" for a far-right group to help aid former president Donald J. Trump in securing the 2020 election.

New documents reveal that the pro-Trump fringe group Liberty Center for God and Country (LCGC), "led a lucrative fundraising blitz in the run-up to the election and quietly networked with now-notorious election denialists. Their work came to light in October of that year when former Houston Police captain Mark Aguirre, 63, allegedly rammed his SUV into a man’s truck, forced the man onto the ground at gunpoint, and accused him of transporting 750,000 fraudulent ballots," The Daily Beast reported. The driver of the truck was "an innocent air conditioner technician" named David Lopez-Zuniga.

Aguirre was indicted this week for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

“[Aguirre] crossed the line from dirty politics to commission of a violent crime and we are lucky no one was killed. His alleged investigation was backward from the start, first alleging a crime had occurred and then trying to prove it happened,” Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg said in a statement.

Aguirre never told police that he had been paid a total of $266,400 by the Houston-based Liberty Center for God and Country, with $211,400 of that amount being deposited into his account the day after the incident.

The case was investigated by the Houston Police and is being prosecuted by the Public Corruption Division of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

Aguirre’s claims of election fraud were found to be baseless after thorough investigation by Houston Police and by the Office Constable Precinct 1 Alan Rosen, as part of the Harris County Election Security Task Force.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-stop-the-steal-2656165121/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4490 on: December 27, 2021, 11:43:11 PM »
Former Democratic senator offers Merrick Garland a roadmap for criminally charging Trump



As more information becomes available about the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, questions are surfacing beyond President Donald Trump's role, including what he was doing for hours while even his political allies were begging him to intervene.

Speaking to MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace Monday, former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), a former state prosecutor, explained what she would encourage Attorney General Merrick Garland to do in terms of persuading members of grand jury to indict Trump criminally.

She encouraged prosecutors to walk jurors through what it looked like in those moments when Trump was watching television coverage of the riots.

According to those who were there in the White House on Jan. 6, Trump was glued to the TV, excited over what his supporters were doing for him. What McCaskill explained is that the text messages, emails, phone calls and desperate requests for help he and his staff were getting are all evidence of Trump's malicious intent.

READ MORE: There are encouraging signs that Trump may finally be headed for his day of legal reckoning

"We can go through and we can put the images at a specific time," she explained. "And we can then fill in the text messages, the phone calls that were flooding the White House saying, get him to call them off. Now, what was he watching on TV at those moments? He was watching windows being broken. He was watching police officers being stabbed with flag poles. He was watching people hang from the balcony in the Senate. He was watching people carry around government property proudly like trophies in the capital. And, frankly, he was watching a confrontation at the door of the House where someone was killed."

According to the accounts of those present, Trump loved it.

"Give me those facts. Give me those timelines, and give me a jury," McCaskill said. "I'm just telling you, any responsible leader would want to end the violence, not provoke it. That's what he did that day, and that's what this committee is going to layout. And that's where Merrick Garland is either going to rise to the occasion or go down in infamy as one of the worst attorney generals in this country's history."

See the video below:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4490 on: December 27, 2021, 11:43:11 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4491 on: December 27, 2021, 11:58:09 PM »
Here is a full list of charges that can be brought against Criminal Donald who is under federal criminal investigations in 2 states and by the House select committee.

FEDERAL CRIMES

I. Offenses Related to the Insurrection and the Attempt to Halt or Delay the Certification of the 2020 Electoral College Vote Count.

Inciting an Insurrection, 18 U.S.C. § 2383, maximum penalty: ten years in prison.

Seditious Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 2384, maximum penalty: twenty years in prison.

Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, maximum penalty: five years in prison.

Obstructing an Official Proceeding, 18 U.S.C. § 1512, maximum penalty twenty years in prison.

II. Offenses Related to the Phone Call Pressuring Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “Find” Enough Votes to Overturn the State’s Election Results.

Depriving or Defrauding the Citizens of a State of a Fair and Impartially Conducted Election, 52 U.S.C. § 20511, maximum penalty: five years.

Conspiracy to Deprive the Citizens of a State of Rights Secured by the Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 241, maximum penalty: ten years.

III. Offenses Related to the 2016 Election, the Hush-Money Payoffs to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, and the 2017 “Reimbursements” to Michael Cohen.

Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, maximum penalty: five years in prison.

Campaign Finance Law Violations, 52 U.S.C. § 30109, maximum penalty: five years in prison.

IV. Offenses Related to the Mueller Investigation, and the Attempts to Halt or Otherwise Derail the Investigation.

Obstruction of Justice, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1510, 1512, maximum penalty: ten years.

NEW YORK CRIMES

Offenses Related to Private Business Practices.

Falsifying Business Records, New York Penal Law, § 175.10, maximum penalty: four years in prison.

Tax Fraud, New York Tax Law, § 1806, maximum penalty: twenty-five years in prison.

Insurance Fraud, New York Penal Law, § 176.30, maximum penalty: twenty-five years in prison.

Conspiracy, New York Penal Law, § 105, maximum penalty: twenty-five years in prison.

Racketeering and Organized Criminal Activity, New York Penal Law § 460, maximum penalty: twenty-five years in prison.

GEORGIA CRIMES

Offenses Related to the Raffensperger Phone Call

Solicitation to Commit Election Fraud, Georgia Code § 21-2-64, maximum penalty: ten years in prison.

Tampering with a Voter’s Certificate, Georgia Code § 21-2-56, maximum penalty: ten years in prison.

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4492 on: December 28, 2021, 12:51:59 PM »
REVEALED: Peter Navarro planned conspiracy with Steve Bannon by ‘lining up over 100 congressmen’ to overthrow the election



Peter Navarro's name hasn't come up much when it comes to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and the last-minute plot to overthrow the 2020 election, but his recently published memoir admits to exactly that.

The Daily Beast revealed Monday that Navarro's book cites Steve Bannon as a cohort in a "hail Mary" attempt to stop the election certification. Further, Navarro confessed that he coordinated with Republican members of Congress to do it. The claim could explain the apology text message that Mark Meadows turned over to the committee reading "I'm sorry" and "we tried."

The co-conspirators even named the mission, calling it "the Green Bay Sweep." When discussing it in an interview with the Beast, he named Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as officials who helped spearhead the effort.

"We spent a lot of time lining up over 100 congressmen, including some senators. It started out perfectly. At 1 p.m., Gosar and Cruz did exactly what was expected of them,” Navarro told the Beast. "It was a perfect plan. And it all predicated on peace and calm on Capitol Hill. We didn’t even need any protestors, because we had over 100 congressmen committed to it."

"That commitment appeared as Congress was certifying the 2020 Electoral College votes reflecting that Joe Biden beat Trump. Sen. Cruz signed off on Congressman Gosar’s official objection to counting Arizona’s electoral ballots, an effort that was supported by dozens of other Trump loyalists," the Beast recalled.

It's unknown whether the House Committee has caused Cruz and Gosar to testify or requested documents from them. However, Navarro's book may be the catalyst that sparks the subpoenas.

Navarro explained that the goal was to run out the clock to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to stop the certification, something he believed he had no power to do. As Pence's book revealed, he had already spoken to former Vice President Dan Quayle (R-IN) about the request.

They thought that the speeches from 100 members would force the media to cover the unproven conspiracy theories about election fraud that were never proven. Instead, thousands of Trump supporters ascended on the U.S. Capitol in a violent attack, sending those same members running for their lives. After returning to the chamber, many avid Trump supporters were unwilling to oppose the election any further.

"The Green Bay Sweep was very well thought out. It was designed to get us 24 hours of televised hearings," Navarro asserted. "But we thought that we could bypass the corporate media by getting this stuff televised."

Bannon allegedly warned on his show that "all hell is going to break loose." But he later tried to correct the record, saying he wasn't talking about the violence but about Pence.

"What I was talking about was Pence. Call the play, run the play. Pence was going to send it back to Arizona. Send it back to Georgia. Send it back to Pennsylvania," Bannon claimed. Bannon never spoke to Pence, who never had any intention of sending the election back to the states, according to his book.

"My role was to provide the receipts for the 100 congressmen or so who would make their cases… who could rely in part on the body of evidence I'd collected,” Navarro confessed to the Beast. "To lay the legal predicate for the actions to be taken."

No massive election fraud effort has been uncovered. Any individual crimes wouldn't have changed any of the outcomes.

"Steve Bannon’s role was to figure out how to use this information—what he called 'receipts'—to overturn the election result. That’s how Steve had come up with the Green Bay Sweep idea," Navarro wrote in his new book. "The political and legal beauty of the strategy was this: by law, both the House of Representatives and the Senate must spend up to two hours of debate per state on each requested challenge. For the six battleground states, that would add up to as much as twenty-four hours of nationally televised hearings across the two chambers of Congress."

When Navarro woke up on Jan. 6 he got a text message from Bannon saying that the Green Bay Sweep was a go. "Call the play. Run the play," the book said.

He also said he was scheduled to speak to the crowds at the Ellipse, but it ultimately wasn't in the cards. Navarro was grateful because he really needed to focus on his attempt to overthrow the election.

"It was better for me to spend that morning working on the Green Bay Sweep. Just checking to see that everything was in line, that congressmen were on board," Navarro confessed. "It was a pretty mellow morning for me. I was convinced everything was set in place.”

Bannon hasn't commented on the fact that Navarro implicates him in his book.

Read the full interview and excerpts from Navarro's book at the Daily Beast:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-advisor-peter-navarro-lays-out-how-he-and-steve-bannon-planned-to-overturn-bidens-electoral-win

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4492 on: December 28, 2021, 12:51:59 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4493 on: December 28, 2021, 01:01:23 PM »
Trump scored over $4 million in government handouts for his Scottish golf course



President Donald Trump was able to score $4 million in government subsidies from the U.K. government during the 2020 pandemic because his Scottish golf course was floundering.

BusinessInsider cited published company accounts in a Monday report revealing Trump Turnberry in Ayrshire slashed 273 jobs in 2020, while also claiming $3.7 million in furlough support. Then they scored an additional chunk of change in bailout dollars.

While Trump handed over the operations to his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, he still maintains a financial interest in the company.

"Additional government data reviewed by The Guardian shows both resorts made further financial claims this year as the U.K. government's emergency job retention scheme persisted," the report also said.

The furlough support numbers come from the 2021 claims, which were worth between $698,000 and $1.7 million, according to the BBC. But that adds to the previous year's total between $4.4 million and $5.5 million the previous year.

Trump's numbers claim that he lost more than $4 million in 2020 for the Turnberry property and $1.7 million at his Aberdeenshire resort. They both cited the COVID-19 lockdown as the reason for the staff and financial losses.

Ironically, the documents, which Eric Trump signed, also cited Brexit as a reason for financial losses, said The Independent.

"Brexit has also impacted our business as supply chains have been impacted by the availability of drivers and staff, reducing deliveries and availability of certain product lines," Trump claimed, according to the report.

Trump was an avid supporter of Brexit, saying that the U.K. would be "better off" without the European Union. He later denied saying it, claiming that it wasn't that he was supportive of Brexit, he merely predicted that it would pass.

Read the full report from BusinessInsider:

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-scotland-golf-courses-claimed-4-million-uk-covid-aid-2021-12

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4494 on: December 29, 2021, 02:28:04 PM »
Reporter reveals the moment Peter Navarro realized he may have landed in hot water: 'Oh no, I've said too much'



Peter Navarro appeared to realize he said too much at one point in an interview where he told a reporter that he and Steve Bannon plotted an attempted coup to keep Donald Trump in the White House.

The former White House trade adviser revealed in his new memoir that he and Bannon coordinated an effort with Republican lawmakers to stop the certification of Joe Biden's election win, which spun into the violent Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, but he told The Daily Beast they had lined up 100 lawmakers, including some senators, to complete their coup -- which ultimately failed.

"This House select committee that's investigating the events of Jan. 6 aren't just looking at the mob that attacked the Capitol," Daily Beast reporter Joe Pagliery told MSNBC's "Morning Joe." "They're also looking at the attempt to rip apart the fabric of our republic using the legislative branch, and what we've got here is Peter Navarro saying, 'Look, we had nothing to do with the violence, it didn't work in our favor because it stopped us from what doing what we really wanted to do, which was stop the certification of President Biden's win.'"

"But here's the thing," Pagliery added. "The way to think about this is, there was an attempted coup, but that's the hard coup. Someone called this, on the record, the soft coup. We have a former active White House official saying while he was in the administration was using his power there to put this into play, which I think is absolutely fascinating."

After the rioters were cleared from the Capitol, 147 Republican lawmakers voted against certifying Biden's election win, but Pagliery said Navarro became cagey when he asked which ones conspired with him and Bannon to halt the process.

"I don't have that list," Paglery said. "When I asked Mr. Navarro to talk to me about who he spoke with, he seemed reticent to do so. I think at that point he may have been realizing, 'Oh no, I've said too much.' The book and the conversation with me he details how he got text messages from Steve Bannon, he woke up to messages from people who were on board with this plan and he was in communication with them that morning, before a morning run around the National Mall."

"It's right there," he added. "If the committee investigators want to look into this, the guy is saying he's got communications and, as far as we know, he hasn't been subpoenaed yet or asked to turn over documents. That might change after this reporting."


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4495 on: December 30, 2021, 12:54:06 AM »
Pentagon keeps trying to stamp out extremism — and keeps failing: report

Despite decades of efforts by the Pentagon to end extremism within its ranks, a new Associated Press investigation found that "racism and extremism remain an ongoing concern in the military."

"The investigation shows the new guidelines do not address ongoing disparities in military justice under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the legal code that governs the U.S. armed forces. Numerous studies, including a report last year from the Government Accountability Office, show Black and Hispanic service members were disproportionately investigated and court-martialed," the AP reported. "The AP investigation also shows the military’s judicial system has no explicit category for bias-motivated crimes – something the federal government, at least 46 states, and the District of Columbia have on the books – making it difficult to quantify crimes prompted by prejudice."

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin instituted a one-day stand-down in February to address extremism.

"The new National Defense Authorization Act signed into law by President Biden on Monday directs the Secretary of Defense to make a recommendation to Congress within 180 days if a new statute is needed to address violent extremism, but does not address hate crimes or racial disparities in military law," the AP reported. "The new Pentagon rules do not outright ban service members from being members of extremist organizations, such as the Ku Klux Klan, Oath Keepers, or other right-wing and white nationalist groups. The regulations, like the previous ones, only prohibit 'active participation,' in such groups, a murky policy that civil rights organizations have raised concerns about for years."

The Ku Klux Klan, in particular, has been a problem for the Pentagon.

"In the 1970s, extremism in the military gained national attention when the Ku Klux Klan was found to be operating openly at Camp Pendleton, a U.S. Marine Corps base in southern California. White Marine klansmen openly distributed racist literature on the base, pasted KKK stickers on barracks doors, and hid illegal weapons in their rooms," the AP reported. "In June of 1986, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Klanwatch Project issued one of the first of many warnings to the DOD about white supremacists in its ranks and urged then-Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger to bar active duty service members from belonging to Ku Klux Klan factions. The center at that time alleged it had evidence, including photos, of active-duty U.S. Marines who had participated in the Confederate Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, a North Carolina-based Klan faction that changed its name last year to the White Patriot Party."

Pentagon officials did not respond to dozens of questions from the AP on how it plans to implement the new guidelines.

Read the full report:

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2021/12/29/decades-of-dod-efforts-fail-to-stamp-out-bias-extremism/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4495 on: December 30, 2021, 12:54:06 AM »