Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2  (Read 453526 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6280 on: June 20, 2023, 11:22:50 AM »
Advertisement
Trump gives reason for hoarding Mar-a-Lago classified documents: ‘Didn’t want to hand them over’



Former President Donald Trump said Monday that he didn’t “want to hand over” boxes of classified government documents despite getting a subpoena because he hoped to keep personal items that he believed belong to him.

Doubling down on his “my boxes” defense, Trump admitted in an interview with Fox News’ Brett Baier that he intentionally defied the grand jury subpoena so he could rummage through the boxes that he first took to his Mar-a-Lago estate more than 1½ years earlier.

“I had boxes. I want to go through the boxes and get all my personal things out,” Trump said. “I don’t want to hand that over to (federal officials) yet.”

Trump did not flinch when given the chance by Baier to deny or explain prosecution claims that he ordered the boxes moved from a storage room to hide them from federal investigators and even his own lawyers.

"Before I send boxes over, I have to take all of my things out,” Trump insisted defiantly. “These boxes were interspersed with all sorts of things.”

Trump first floated the outlandish claim that he had the right to withhold the classified documents in a fundraising speech the last week hours after he was arraigned on 37 federal counts tied to the documents case.

But he expanded on the argument in the Monday interview in a way that may give valuable ammunition to prosecutors, especially since everything he says about the case can be used against him at trial.

Defense lawyers would likely cringe at Trump’s admission that he intentionally refused to comply with the subpoena. And by explaining his supposed reasons for defying the subpoena, Trump is effectively handing prosecutors a motive for the crimes.

The interview came hours after Trump was ordered Monday not to share evidence in his classified documents case with others or spread it on social media.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart instructed Trump not to disseminate any of the information his defense team is set to receive from federal prosecutors as the discovery phase of the historic case cranks up.

“The Discovery Materials ... shall not be disclosed to the public or the news media, or disseminated on any news or social media platform, without prior notice to and consent of the United States or approval of the Court,” Reinhart, who authorized the search warrant for Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, wrote in the order.

The order, which was requested by the prosecution, was not opposed by Trump’s lawyers.

It bars Trump from discussing the evidence with anyone not directly related to the case. It also sets strict limits to how Trump can access the documents, requiring him to review them only in the presence of his lawyers and barring him from taking them out of their offices.

The former president could face criminal contempt of court charges if he violates the order, Reinhart said.

Reinhart issued the order but controversial U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon is expected to preside over Trump’s trial in a south Florida court.

Trump faces a similar limited gag order in his New York state case on charges tied to hush money payments made to adult star Stormy Daniels.

Cannon, a right-wing Trump appointee who has next to no trial experience, last year was heavily criticized for a series of short-lived pro-Trump rulings over the documents that were recovered in the Mar-a-Lago search.

Trump is the only former president ever indicted on criminal charges. He pleaded not guiltyat his arraignment last week.

The order applies to Trump as well as his co-defendant Walt Nauta, who is accused of helping the former president hide classified documents from the feds.

© New York Daily News



Trump doubles down on attacking 'coward' Bill Barr as Fox News' Baier presses him on documents



In an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, former President Donald Trump was cornered about his handling of highly classified national defense information, for which he has been indicted on 37 federal charges.

Trump's reaction was to attack former Attorney General William Barr, who has become a sharp critic of his former boss' actions and has even predicted that more indictments are coming.

"Fox viewers were able to watch your speech here at Bedminster," said Baier. "And your explanation of the Presidential Records Act and your defense, how you and others believe that that applies here. Obviously, you know, other legal experts, your attorney general, Bill Barr. They do not think that that applies to handling classified national security and defense materials. But that legal battle aside, I just want to ask you a couple of specifics. Why did you have these very sensitive national security defense documents like the war plans for a strike on Iran?"

"So like every other president, I take things out," said Trump. "And in my case, I took it out pretty much in a hurry. But people packed it up and we left. And I had clothing in there. I had all sorts of personal items and much, much stuff. And by the way, when Bill Barr, who's, you know, a coward, Bill Barr was a coward. Bill Barr didn't do what he was supposed to do. I fired him and he has great hatred. And that's OK, because some people do. And some people love me very much."

Baier pointed out that Barr actually resigned, to which Trump responded, "I asked him, give me a letter immediately. Because he didn't have the courage to go after so many different things." He also reiterated his previous claim that "As far as the levels and all, everything was declassified because I had the right to declassify ... I have every right to have those boxes." Notably, this is at odds with Trump's own admission on tape speaking to Bedminster guests that he didn't declassify all the documents in his possession.

This is not the first time Trump has used the "coward" moniker for Barr, who left the administration amid disagreements of how Trump was trying to use the Justice Department to overturn the 2020 election results. Earlier this month, Trump also attacked Barr as a "coward" during an interview with his longtime friend and adviser Roger Stone.

Watch:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6280 on: June 20, 2023, 11:22:50 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6281 on: June 20, 2023, 11:35:50 AM »
Trump All But Confesses to Mishandling Classified Docs on Fox News

The former president, facing charges of mishandling classified information, nearly confessed to the crime — while blaming his “golf shirts”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/donald-trump-all-but-confesses-mishandling-classified-docs-fox-news-bret-baier-1234774379/


Legal analyst predicts Trump's next excuse will be the 'old man' defense



Donald Trump appeared on the Fox News network on Monday, where legal analysts believe he did more harm than good for his case in the stolen documents trial.

Speaking about the segment on MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell, former acting solicitor general Neal Katyal, along with Andrew Weissmann and Bradley Moss, listened to the interview on camera, shaking their heads and occasionally chuckling.

"Well Lawrence, the breaking news tonight is that the special prosecutor, Jack Smith has a new addition to his legal team tonight, an unpaid new deputy special counsel: His name is Donald J. Trump," Katyal quipped.

What Trump has described contradicts both the tape-recorded conversation about the Iran war plan and testimony from those who were in the room and heard what was said.

"So, Mr. Trump, good luck with that defense," said Katyal. "If it were just newspaper articles, why in the world are you saying on the tape that it's classified? It's totally incoherent. And the other parts of the tape, like the part you just played for Andrew, really is an admission of guilt. Like, if you just think about the Espionage Act, what is the prosecution need to show? They needed to show the defendant had unauthorized possession of a defense intelligence — national defense documents, that he willfully retained the document, and failed to give the documents to an officer of the U.S. Those are the elements. So, the Trump admission goes to all of that."

The next clip that O'Donnell played asked Trump again why he wanted the documents. He explained that he never said he wanted to keep the documents.

"I was giving them back. All of a sudden, we got raided," Trump claimed. The indictment says that at the time, Trump was having his valet Walt Nauta, move the documents around so that they couldn't be found.

"He's going to say he's gotten old. He's been with all these retirees down in Florida. He can't think anything straight. He doesn't know what he has, he forgets things. He gets facts jumbled up," Moss joked. "Look at that clip, he is talking about, 'Oh we were negotiating when Nauta and I got rated.' Well, no, you left something out. There was a subpoena that came after that, after you started giving stuff back. And you lied to the DOJ, you had Nauta moving documents; that's why you got raided. I understand. It happens to a lot of individuals when they move down to Florida. They start to get confused. It will be me one day, I'm sure. But no, this is not a defense. He has clearly walked himself into a bunch of damaging admissions. Jack Smith has gotta be recording all of that, and they are just laughing and popping popcorn because he did nothing to help his case."

Watch:


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Donald Trump Indicted!
« Reply #6282 on: June 20, 2023, 08:27:13 PM »
Trump classified documents trial date set for Aug. 14
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/20/trump-classified-documents-trial-date-set-for-aug-14.html


This interview did not go well for him’: Trump defends keeping documents

In a new interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, former President Trump defended keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

Watch:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Donald Trump Indicted!
« Reply #6282 on: June 20, 2023, 08:27:13 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6283 on: June 20, 2023, 09:02:46 PM »
Trump jury trial in Mar-a-Lago docs case slated to start in August

It appears that special counsel Jack Smith may get his wish to give former President Donald Trump a speedy trial.

Law and Crime News' Adam Klasfeld reports that the jury trial in the Trump Mar-a-Lago documents case is set to begin on August 14th, 2023 under Judge Aileen Cannon.

Lawyers for both the prosecution and defense must also file their motions aimed at potentially excluding certain evidence by July 24th.

Trump was indicted earlier this month on 37 felony counts related to willful retention of national defense information and obstruction of justice.

Trump currently faces a slew of legal problems, including a civil lawsuit over allegedly fraudulent business practices from New York Attorney General Letitia James; criminal charges related to his hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels; criminal charges related to his decision to stash top-secret government documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort; and two different investigations into his efforts to illegally remain in power after losing the 2020 election to President Joe Biden.

https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1671134354049777668



'Opposite of a witch hunt': CNN panel blows up Trump's claims of persecution

Former President Donald Trump has reacted to his federal Espionage Act indictment over the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case by claiming he is the victim of political persecution aimed to take him out of contention for president.

But new reporting from The Washington Post that revealed the FBI and Justice Department were reluctant to pursue Trump at all, and dragged their feet on a separate investigation of his role in the January 6 attack for a year, clearly demonstrates it was anything but, said a CNN panel on Tuesday morning.

"It's a failure by the Justice Department," said panel member and former federal prosecutor Elie Honig. "They are making up for lost time now. Yes, the pace of this investigation has picked up markedly, especially since Jack Smith took over. But — we discussed it at the time — for the first year and a half, DOJ was allergic, categorically allergic, to looking at the real power sources. Yes, they did and have to go after the people who stormed the Capitol, but those are not either/or propositions. DOJ has literally 10,000 federal prosecutors. They should have aimed at the people who stormed the Capitol and aimed high right away."

"There was a real cost for DOJ of not getting to the witnesses first in terms of — and what is so interesting about the Washington Post reporting is that it says that they really, for fear of looking political, didn't go directly after the former president and his closest allies because of that," said anchor Poppy Harlow.

"It shows this is the opposite of a witch hunt," said CNN analyst John Avlon. "It's about due process and the concern about the appearance of impropriety. A lot of times this has been sort of the Boy Scouts versus mob bosses, people willing to do anything and other people trying to uphold not only the law but being allergic to the appearance of impropriety."

"This information came to a head and now we will see," Avlon added. "The seditious conspiracy charges are very hard. We will see whether that gets taken."

Watch:


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6284 on: June 20, 2023, 09:13:15 PM »
Trump is 'one step closer to jail' after 'incriminating and idiotic' Fox News interview: Morning Joe

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough expressed astonishment at Donald Trump's "incoherent" interview on Fox News.

The former president sat down with broadcaster Bret Baier, who challenged him to explain why he had not returned classified materials to the National Archives until the FBI seized them, and the "Morning Joe" host said Trump didn't do himself any favors by insisting he had been too "busy" to sort through the tranche to separate out his golf attire and other personal items.

"Yeah, none of that is going to hold up in court," Scarborough said. "It was incoherent. I must say, incoherent, incriminating and stupid. I say that by saying Donald Trump actually wants people to believe that in his transcript, he is looking at a document and telling an aide, 'I can't declassify this now, I could have when I was president of the United States, but I can't now.' Later in the interview, why, in 2022 -- he lost the election in 2020, in 2022, why did he hide the documents? Because he had golf shirts, clothing, pants and shoes inside cases with nuclear information, war plans against Iran, and some of America's greatest vulnerabilities, all in there with Mar-a-Lago golf shirts."

The ex-president always seems to be held to a different standard legally, Scarborough said, pointing to a Washington Postreport that showed the FBI resisted investigating his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection, while Trump complains that he is being treated unfairly.

"There is a double standard," he said. "There's one standard that every government official is held to, who would immediately be, you know, arrested, then there's the standard they held Donald Trump to. Dragged their feet for over a year, and the FBI dragging their feet, not even wanting to get these documents on nuclear secrets, not even wanting to go in to see all the boxes that he had, and Donald Trump saying, 'Oh, it's worse for me, this has never happened before.' Of course, it never happened because, again, he lost in 2020. In 2021, he is still lying. In 2022, he is still lying about having some of the most government secrets."

"Any member of Congress, from Ted Cruz to Bernie Sanders, that got briefed and took three documents -- not all these boxes, not thousands -- but took three classified documents would get a call the next day from the FBI or they'd show up in their offices," Scarborough continued. "It'd be immediate. I was talking to a CIA analyst over the weekend who said if he mishandled one document, though he was a career CIA guy, he would lose his job that day. Might not get arrested for one, but they'd be there knocking on his door the next day. They give Trump years, year and a half, he keeps ignoring them. Now he goes on TV."

"We've sort of summarized Donald Trump's interview with Bret Baier last night as incoherent, incriminating and idiotic on so many levels," Scarborough concluded. "Talk about how he keeps putting himself one step closer to jail every time he does one of these rambling interviews."






Trump should cop a plea if he were a 'normal defendant' -- but he's 'every lawyer's nightmare': legal analyst



Donald Trump's lawyers might want to discuss a plea agreement with the former president after he handed prosecutors "powerful evidence" in an interview on Fox News, but it's far from guaranteed that he would accept the terms.

The former president defended his possession of classified materials and refusal to return them to government custody, and former U.S. attorney Barbara McQuade told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" that his comments to broadcaster Bret Baier could help prosecutors prove one of the most difficult element in the crimes for which Trump has been indicted.

"I think it's very powerful evidence," McQuade said. "I think the hardest thing to prove in most cases, but especially a case like this, is willfulness. For most crimes, ignorance of the law is no defense, but for certain crimes, including mishandling classified information, there is an additional level of willfulness that is proving what you did was illegal and you knew it was illegal. So that little clip where Donald Trump explains about his understanding that he can no longer declassify documents after he leaves the White House says he understands what it means to handle classified documents. He knows that these are regulated by certain laws. For him to say at trial, if there were to be some defense that the government has failed to prove the requisite intent, they'll play this tape. I think a jury will find beyond a reasonable doubt that he absolutely knew what he was doing was illegal."

Trump's attorneys can't be happy with his decision to give the interview or the statements he made, and McQuade said they should consider resigning from the case.

"You have a client who won't listen to you, which is every lawyer's nightmare," she said. "Maybe you dissect it for him and explain to him in very gory detail exactly how harmful that was. These are the elements of the offense, this is what government will have to prove at trial. When you say these things, this is evidence that they will play in court. Perhaps that is one way."

"I think any normal defendant, any normal lawyer would absolutely be talking about a plea," McQuade added. "I can't imagine the government is going to agree to the kind of conditions that Donald Trump would want in exchange. They are going to want prison time because anybody else would get prison time or they'll want, which the Justice Department permits, an agreement not to seek higher office. He's just not going to agree to those kinds of things. Maybe as we get closer to the date and he realizes that serious prison time is at stake, those things may look far more attractive than they do now."

Watch:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6284 on: June 20, 2023, 09:13:15 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6285 on: June 21, 2023, 09:09:09 AM »
Trump support softens with Republican voters since indictment in Mar-a-Lago documents case, poll says



Donald Trump’s support among Republicans has surprisingly softened since his indictment in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, a new national poll revealed Tuesday.

Even though he still holds a commanding lead over a crowded field, Trump’s support dipped from 53% to 47% among GOP voters in the past month, according to the CNN poll of 1,350 registered voters.

A significant 25% of Republicans say prosecutors were right to charge him in the documents case and a similar number say he should end his campaign after being indicted.

Only 67% of GOP voters hold a favorable view of him, down a full 10% from a similar poll in May. The poll, which was conducted late last week, included 560 Republicans and has a 3.4% margin of error.

GOP voters are almost evenly split over whether Trump is the candidate with the best chance of retaking the White House, with 51% saying he is the strongest one and 49% saying he’s not.

The lackluster numbers are somewhat surprising because conventional wisdom held that the indictment would only help Trump consolidate his backing in the GOP primary race.

His support has generally been rising among Republicans in recent months and his poll numbers rose noticeably after his previous indictment on New York state charges tied to a hush money payment made to porn star Stormy Daniels.

The polls could be an outlier or a temporary blip as Trump holds an overwhelming lead over DeSantis, whose support has stuck at 26% even as Trump’s dipped.

Former Vice President Mike Pence earned a relatively strong 9% in the new poll followed by ex-UN ambassador Nikki Haley, Sen. Tim Scott and Trump critic Chris Christie. Others drew less than 1% in the crowded field.

The poll was completed before Trump gave a widely panned interview on Fox News Monday in which he admitted defying a subpoena to return classified documents and claimed he had the right to keep them until he had the chance to rummage through boxes for golf gear and other personal items.

Christie mocked mocked Trump for what he described as a ridiculous excuse for not complying with a federal subpoena.

“Does anybody in America believe this?” Christie asked on CBS News. “Maybe he could have skipped a couple of rounds of golf and gone through the boxes to respond to a subpoena from a grand jury.”

Some of Trump’s rivals may have picked up the stronger-than-expected negative reaction to the indictment in early internal polls of Republicans. Pence and Haley both flip-flopped to gently criticize Trump after initially suggesting the indictment was unfounded.

Even with the modest shifts in Republican attitudes, GOP voters remain dramatically out of step with Americans as a whole.

More than 60% of all voters in the poll approve of the charges against Trump and say he should drop out of the race. That includes more than 90% of Democrats as well as two-thirds of independents.

Those numbers suggest Trump will face a very unfriendly electoral climate in a general election if he is able to navigate his legal woes and win the Republican nomination.

© New York Daily News

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6286 on: June 21, 2023, 09:20:53 PM »
'Trump is not a victim': Dem congressman slaps down John Durham's claims to his face



On Wednesday, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing with former special counsel John Durham, who was appointed by Donald Trump's one-time attorney general William Barr to investigate the origins of the FBI's investigation into Russian ties to Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.

Ultimately, the Durham investigation — long hyped by Trump, Republican House leaders like Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), and their allies as ironclad proof that the earlier Robert Mueller probe was corrupt and political — was a flop, securing only one plea deal, a couple indictments that led to exoneration, and a recommendation of some minor process changes at the FBI, while failing to find any systemic bias or false conclusions in the Mueller investigation.

Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) pointed this out in a blistering opening statement before Durham was sworn in.

"At the end of the day, Mr. Durham never found what he was looking for," said Nadler. "He cannot dispute a single conclusion in the Mueller report. He cannot prove a magnificent 'deep state' conspiracy, he cannot say that the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign's many ties to Russia never should've happened. And again, I can see why this would be disappointing to some. Instead of owning up to his failure, the Durham report doubles down on theories that lost spectacularly before two unanimous juries. The report also references classified material that's been called likely disinformation, played a series of accusations against the former president's perceived enemies. By presenting a so-called finding in this way, swiping a Republican bogeyman and hiding inconvenient truths in footnotes, the Durham report gives Donald Trump one last talking point."

"It did not have to be this way," Nadler continued. "It may be hard to remember, but at the outset of the Durham investigation, Mr. Durham was a well-respected career prosecutor with a solid reputation. The attorney general is supposed to appoint the special counsel to prevent the appearance of politicization in a criminal investigation. Mr. Durham could well have lived up to that expectation. Instead, what we got is a political exercise that operated with ethical ambiguity and existed to perpetuate Donald Trump's unfounded claims. The investigation fulfilled its political objectives, but did real damage to a department that is still recovering from the excesses of the Trump administration. And despite his best efforts, a reckoning is well underway."

"Do not be misled," concluded Nadler. "Former President Donald Trump is not a victim. He did this to himself. For all of its flaws, the Durham report does not show that anyone else is responsible for the president's legal woes, past, present, or future. Anyone that tells you otherwise is simply making it up."

Watch:


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6287 on: June 22, 2023, 09:41:18 AM »
'Partisan hack': Ted Lieu busts John Durham trying to 'spin the facts' on Russia

Rep. Ted. Lieu (D-CA) accused former special counsel John Durham of behaving like a "political hack."

The confrontation came during a Wednesday House Oversight Hearing about Durham's report on the FBI investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Lieu asked Durham if the FBI was obliged to look into Russian interference.

"The FBI should not have ignored that information," Durham agreed.

"A bipartisan U.S. Senate report confirmed that the Russians interfered in the 2016 elections and that that interference benefited Donald Trump," Lieu pointed out. "Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign chairman, also publicly admitted to giving internal Trump campaign data to the Russians, and the U.S. Treasury Department found that this data, which it said was, quote, sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy, was then passed to Russian intelligence services."

"There is a phrase to describe the facts I just set forth," he added. "It's called Russian collusion."

Lieu then asked a series of yes/no questions of Durham.

"Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was convicted, correct?" Lieu asked.

"Correct," Durham replied.

"Trump's former deputy campaign manager, Rick Gates, was convicted, correct?" Lieu pressed.

"That's not in connection with the Russian [investigation]," Durham insisted.

"Mr. Durham, you can hold yourself out as an objective Department of Justice official or as a partisan hack," Lieu warned. "The more that you try to spin the facts and not answer my questions, you sound like the latter."

Lieu concluded by questioning the purpose of the hearing.

"You brought two cases to jury trial based on this investigation, and you lost both," he told Durham. "And so I don't actually know what we're doing here because the author of the Durham report concedes that the FBI had enough information to investigate."

Watch:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #6287 on: June 22, 2023, 09:41:18 AM »