Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2

[John Tonkovich]

Trump et al represent the 'mental' in 'judgemental'.

: )

[John Tonkovich]

Thanks, Dr Crow.
As to the vaccine, six months still seems optimistic. Also, as someone who remembers the 1970's swine flu vaccine debacle, I hope caution will overrule haste.
I do believe Trump, a month ago, was promising a vaccine before election day.

[Richard Smith]

How ironic would it be for the riots going on in Philadelphia to turn the vote in that state in Trump's favor?  All the chickens coming home to roost.  The police shoot a knife wielding maniac who is trying to murder them in a text book justified shooting.  This results in an excuse for riots and looting under the weak dems who control these cities.  No one is able to vote for Old Joe in the only democrat-stronghold in the whole state.  He loses the election out of the inherent lunacy and weakness of his party.  Wow.  And Old Joe expressed his condolences to the family of homicidal maniac who was trying to stab the cops.  Imagine that weak, corrupt, do nothing politician becoming President?  Even briefly until he his obvious mental and physical infirmities result in Kantala taking over.

[Martin Weidmann]

How ironic would it be for the riots going on in Philadelphia to turn the vote in that state in Trump's favor?  All the chickens coming home to roost.  The police shoot a knife wielding maniac who is trying to murder them in a text book justified shooting.  This results in an excuse for riots and looting under the weak dems who control these cities.  No one is able to vote for Old Joe in the only democrat-stronghold in the whole state.  He loses the election out of the inherent lunacy and weakness of his party.  Wow.  And Old Joe expressed his condolences to the family of homicidal maniac who was trying to stab the cops.  Imagine that weak, corrupt, do nothing politician becoming President?  Even briefly until he his obvious mental and physical infirmities result in Kantala taking over.

The police shoot a knife wielding maniac who is trying to murder them in a text book justified shooting.

So said "Judge Richard Smith" before he examined the evidence.....

[Richard Smith]

The police shoot a knife wielding maniac who is trying to murder them in a text book justified shooting.

So said "Judge Richard Smith" before he examined the evidence.....

That is rich coming from the very person who actually used an alias and falsely claimed they had a legal background.  There is a video of the incident.  Anyone can watch it.  That is pretty good evidence.  We don't have to rely on kooks to speculate about what happened.  But let's play along.  Do you have any reason or facts to cast doubt on this conclusion?  It shows a man with a knife chasing the police while they attempt to back away.  And he keeps coming at them.  It is a text book example of the lawful use of deadly force in self defense.  What would you have done in that situation?

[Martin Weidmann]

That is rich coming from the very person who actually used an alias and falsely claimed they had a legal background.  There is a video of the incident.  Anyone can watch it.  That is pretty good evidence.  We don't have to rely on kooks to speculate about what happened.  But let's play along.  Do you have any reason or facts to cast doubt on this conclusion?  It shows a man with a knife chasing the police while they attempt to back away.  And he keeps coming at them.  It is a text book example of the lawful use of deadly force in self defense.  What would you have done in that situation?

That is rich coming from the very person who actually used an alias and falsely claimed they had a legal background.

So said "Judge Richard Smith" [which btw is an alias!] without having a shred of evidence for his false claims.....

There is a video of the incident.

Yes, there are multiple videos of the incident and in none of them do you see the victim running towards the police trying to stab them.

What you do see is two officers with guns drawn all the time at a safe distance from the victim, who is walking, and still shooting him multiple times.

We don't have to rely on kooks to speculate about what happened.

Indeed, so stop telling us what happened, kook!

Do you have any reason or facts to cast doubt on this conclusion?

Yes... the conclusion is coming from just about the most biased person there is; You!

It is a text book example of the lawful use of deadly force in self defense.

You clearly haven't read the text book...

What would you have done in that situation?

Immobilize him by either taser or shooting him in his leg.... Not by opening up with two guns and shooting him multiple times.

Btw, you might not understand this, but if the first shot immobilized him, all subsequent can be deemed by law to be use of excessive force resulting in manslaughter or wrongful death.

[Richard Smith]

That is rich coming from the very person who actually used an alias and falsely claimed they had a legal background.

So said "Judge Richard Smith" [which btw is an alias!] without having a shred of evidence for his false claims.....

There is a video of the incident.

Yes, there are multiple videos of the incident and in none of them do you see the victim running towards the police trying to stab them.

What you do see is two officers with guns drawn all the time at a safe distance from the victim, who is walking, and still shooting him multiple times.

We don't have to rely on kooks to speculate about what happened.

Indeed, so stop telling us what happened, kook!

Do you have any reason or facts to cast doubt on this conclusion?

Yes... the conclusion is coming from just about the most biased person there is; You!

It is a text book example of the lawful use of deadly force in self defense.

You clearly haven't read the text book...

What would you have done in that situation?

Immobilize him by either taser or shooting him in his leg.... Not by opening up with two guns and shooting him multiple times.

Btw, you might not understand this, but if the first shot immobilized him, all subsequent can be deemed by law to be use of excessive force resulting in manslaughter or wrongful death.

Again, the incident is on tape.  We don't have to debate it.  Anyone can watch it for themselves to determine whether this maniac is approaching the police with a knife or not.  That is not even the point.  Just another trip down the Roger Collins rabbit hole.  The actual point is that the riots and looting that have resulted in Philadelphia could affect the turnout in the only area of the entire state that votes for dems.  So it would be karma if the weak willed dems who supposedly run that city caused Old Joe's demise.  At least they would feel the pain for once of all those folks who have had to suffer in these cities from their incompetence. 

[Jerry Organ]

Democrats: Hoping for elevated pandemic numbers.
Republicans: Hoping for riots.

Folks, their elections and attitude towards the poor who bear the burden are different than ours.