Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2  (Read 468200 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4832 on: March 13, 2022, 12:34:49 AM »
Advertisement
At least you are acknowledging that we are living is a state of constant disasters under Biden.  The worst year in American history since the Civil War.  And it gets worse every day.  Biden's weakness and incompetence were demonstrated throughout his long career in politics.  No American voter should have expected anything differently now that he is completely senile.  It is just too bad that the people of Ukraine also have to pay the price for the American public buying the hoaxes perpetuated by the likes of Rick and CNN during the 2020 election.  Those chickens have come home to roost.

More total BS:

We lived under 4 years of disaster under Criminal Donald and he handed them all off to Biden to deal with. 4 years of weakness from an absolute moron who had no business being in the oval office. The only reason Donnie was installed was because Putin needed a stooge to do his dirty work for him and Donnie delivered.

John Bolton said Putin put off invading Ukraine while Trump ‘did a lot of his work for him’
‘To Putin’s mind...a weaker Nato is a stronger Russia’


A former United States national security secretary adviser has said Vladimir Putin did not invade Ukraine while Donald Trump was president because of his hostility towards Nato, or the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.

Speaking with Julie Mason, a journalist and the host of Julie Mason Mornings, John Bolton said Mr Trump’s known hostility of Nato meant Mr Putin was reassured of his aims while the Republican was in office.

“I think one of the reasons that Putin did not move during Trump’s term in office was he saw the president’s hostility of Nato,” Mr Bolton said on Wednesday when asked about the situation in Ukraine.

“To Putin’s mind its a binary proposition, a weaker Nato is a stronger Russia so I think Putin saw Trump doing a lot of his work for him, and thought maybe in a second term Trump would make good on his promise to get out of Nato”.

The New York Times revealed in 2019 that Mr Trump told White House aides about his desire to remove the US from Nato, and a year later even referred to Germany as “delinquent” before removing 12,000 US troops from the Nato member and US ally in 2020.

Mr Bolton, who was asked whether or not a second Trump term would have helped Ukraine, said “I think we’d be in a lot worse state” and that Russia’s president had expressed as far as back as 2005 that he viewed the fall of the Soviet Union as a “tragedy”.

“He said back in 2005 in an address to the state duma, the parliament, that the break up of the Soviet Union had been the greatest tragedy of the 21st century and clearly he wanted to reverse it”, Mr Bolton told the radio host. “(We were) underestimating his determination to get back into control (of) and perhaps actual sovereignty (over) parts of the former Soviet Union”.

“I think a lot of people believed he would not carry through with a lot of the threats that he made”, Mr Bolton, who served as Mr Trump’s national security advisor from 2018 to 2019, said.

He told Vice News in a recent interview that he also doubted Mr Trump’s enthusiasm for standing in Mr Putin’s way, with the Republican forced to roll back on comments that described the Russian leader as “savvy” and a “genius” for launching an invasion of Ukraine, its neighbour, on a false pretext.

“You never know with Trump,” Mr Bolton said. “It depends on what time of day it is, it depends on what he thought his political benefit would be at any given moment. I don’t think ultimately he would have stood in Putin’s way”.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/john-bolton-putin-ukraine-invasion-trump-b2032764.html

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4832 on: March 13, 2022, 12:34:49 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4833 on: March 13, 2022, 11:36:02 AM »
A weak and useless Donald Trump put our safety in security in jeopardy as he took the side of a dictator over our own U.S. Intelligence in Helsinki. We are now suffering the consequences of those 4 disastrous years as Donnie gave Putin whatever he wanted for his Ukraine invasion.   

Trump has taken Putin's side. His stability and America's safety are now in question.

Donald Trump has taken a side and it's not ours. He waltzed into a media event with Vladimir Putin, a professional intelligence officer, and imperiled America.

July 16, 2018


Donald Trump shows his weakness to Putin on the world stage in Helsinki 

The Helsinki summit is over, and we are all left struggling to find the words to capture the nightmare that in the space of less than 24 hours destroyed years of American diplomacy, sacrifice and leadership.

So perhaps we should just admit what our own eyes cannot deny: We have now witnessed the very worst humiliation of a president of the United States ever, and one of the lowest points in the history of the American presidency.

The summit was completely in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s control, and it showed. That was to be expected from an incompetent leader believing he could waltz unprepared into a news media event with a professional intelligence officer. A summit without an agenda is a bad idea from the start, but President Donald Trump clearly wanted to replicate the artificial media high of his trip to Singapore to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un — another disgraceful episode in itself — and garner high ratings and hollow applause from his usual fans and camp-followers.

But Kim is a young and relatively inexperienced brute, whose personal stature and weird mien do not play all that well on television. And all Kim needed to do was share a stage with an American president to accomplish his mission. Kim is crude and dangerous, but he is an amateur.­­­

Putin was careful and icily competent

Putin, however, is no amateur. He performed brilliantly, turning every issue back to the Americans, and Trump took it all. Ukraine? The Americans should talk to their Ukrainian friends, not us. Espionage? Pish-posh. We’re not that kind of country, but if you’d like us to look into it, hand over Putin opponent Bill Browder. Syria? Of course, we’d love to remain involved there under the guise of humanitarian aid, thank you for the invitation. Putin did what one would expect him to do, and his behavior was icily competent and carefully executed.

Trump, who understands none of these issues, stood there waiting for his few openings to plead his usual litany of insecurity and victimhood. Things have never been worse, Trump said, although Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, who weathered the Berlin Blockade, the Cuban missile crisis, and the 1983 war scare, would probably disagree. It’s doubtful Trump knows about any of those things, as they happened long ago and did not directly involve him personally, and therefore are not important.

Had the summit ended before the two leaders took any questions, it would have been a U.S. defeat, largely because it gave Putin a chance to refute all charges against his regime and to stand — like Kim — on a stage with the putative leader of the Free World after directing multiple attacks on the U.S. and its allies.

Once the questions began, Trump's behavior was not only shameful, but bizarre and seriously worrisome. The president of the United States not only sided with the Russian president, but he did so against the American intelligence community, the American law enforcement community, and the American system of justice.

Given an opportunity to hold Russia accountable for anything — anything at all — the president instantly equivocated, blaming both countries. He babbled, literally, about servers. He attacked Democrats. He rambled about the Electoral College. He revealed, again, his obsession with Hillary Clinton, and noted that in Russia, no one would have lost her emails.

Putin, meanwhile, was serene, as well he should have been. He chuckled warmly as he instructed us all in the nature of intelligence tradecraft. "Do you think that we try to collect compromising material (on all high-ranking American businessmen)?" Of course the Russians do this. The only person in the world who doesn’t seem to understand this is Trump. Instead, responding to whether Putin had "compromising material" on him, he ran to Putin’s defense — and his own: If they had it, "it would have been out long ago." That’s not only a stupid dare, but a statement that could come back to haunt Trump.

By the end of this circus, Trump was practically mewling, begging for Putin's approval, saying that Putin's denials were "extremely strong and powerful," almost in a kind of strangely erotic tone of admiration.

The very last thing the president of the United States did at a summit with the Russian president was to attack an FBI agent. His last words, just before "thank you," were "witch hunt." Putin could not have scripted it better.

Trump stability, US safety in question

Every single person involved in this fiasco — national security adviser John Bolton chief among them — should be given no rest from questions about why this happened, what they intend to do now, and whether they think they can still serve the president now that he has unveiled a new policy of no-limits appeasement.

Meanwhile, Trump's performance will raise concerns not only about the president's personal stability, but about the future and safety of the United States and its allies that will last long beyond this moment. Trump thinks he solved everything in four hours, but we are all now in more danger than we were a day ago.

The Russians, at this moment, continue to attack us and they will attempt to interfere in the 2018 elections. Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, has told us point-blank that all of the warning lights of an impending attack of some kind are flashing red, which is not language that the DNI — and a Trump ally — would use lightly. If Putin now thinks he can act against the U.S. and NATO with impunity, as he surely must, then we are headed for one of the most dangerous periods since the end of the Cold War.

But the president, the commander in chief of our armed forces, the man whose oath requires him to defend us, has taken sides. He has taken Putin’s side. We are in significant peril, and it will not abate soon.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/07/16/donald-trump-sides-vladimir-putin-most-danger-since-cold-war-column/786850002/

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5387
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4834 on: March 13, 2022, 11:15:19 PM »
"The Russian attack on Ukraine is appalling, it's an outrage and an atrocity that should never have been allowed to occur.  We are praying for the proud people of Ukraine. God bless them all."

Donald J. Trump (statement on 02/26/22)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4834 on: March 13, 2022, 11:15:19 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4835 on: March 14, 2022, 05:13:24 AM »
Kevin McCarthy has changed his tune because he saw the new polls which shows the overwhelming majority of Americans 80% supporting Ukraine and President Biden to take on Russia. Too late for Kevin and the GOP to change now when they were supporting Pro Putin lover Criminal Donald's continued praising of Putin and spent years attacking Ukraine with false Russian propaganda.

McCarthy distances himself from Trump by condemning Putin’s actions -- here’s why its already too late



House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has a habit of echoing former President Donald Trump's baseless claims and conspiracy theories but he's opted to break from Trump on one of the most critical topics being discussed right now: Russian President Vladamir Putin.

According to The Washington Post, McCarthy's recent discussion with reporters included a rare moment in which he refrained from echoing the words of the former president. Speaking to reporters during his latest news conference, the high-ranking Republican lawmaker admitted he disagrees with Trump's remarks describing Putin as "savvy" and a "genius."

“I do not think anything’s savvy or genius about Putin,” McCarthy told reporters. “I think Putin is evil. He’s a dictator. And I think he’s murdering people right now.”

McCarthy's remarks come less than a month after Trump's interview on a right-wing radio broadcast where he praised Putin's leadership on the invasion of Ukraine.

“I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, ‘This is genius.’ Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine — Putin declares it as independent,” Trump said.

He later added: “Here’s a guy that says, you know, ‘I’m gonna declare a big portion of Ukraine independent’ — he used the word ‘independent’ — ‘and we’re gonna go out and we’re gonna go in and we’re gonna help keep peace.’ You gotta say that’s pretty savvy.”

Although McCarthy is choosing to publicly disagree with Trump now, the damage is already done. For months now, many Republican lawmakers have echoed Trump's praise and admiration of Putin. Now, Republicans are backpedaling. It's highly likely that this situation will get far worse before it improves but Republicans did not consider that possibility while championing Putin's actions.

https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-kevin-mccarthy-2656948506/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4836 on: March 14, 2022, 01:14:28 PM »
This psychotic lunatic is trying to incite more violence based on a bogus conspiracy theory. This Russian asset continues to divide America and cause chaos based on race.

Trump blasted for telling followers they 'must lay down their very lives' to defend against CRT



Donald Trump is calling on his followers to "lay down their very lives" to defend the United States against critical race theory. The disgraced former president delivered that dangerous call to arms at his "Save America" rally SaPersonay night in Florence, South Carolina.

"Getting critical race theory out of our schools is not just a matter of values, it's also a matter of national survival," Trump told his MAGA supporters. So-called critical race theory is not something that is taught in K-12 grades, it is a college-level interdisciplinary means to examine social and institutional constructs surrounding race.

"We have no choice," Trump continued, a claim he often makes when speaking falsely.

That's when he laid the groundwork for weaponizing his followers in the racist battle inside his mind that one day may erupt in physical war on our streets.

"The fate of any nation depends upon the willingness of its citizens to lay down – and they must do this – lay down their very lives to defend their country. If we allow the Marxists and communists and socialists to teach our children to hate America there will be no one left to defend our flag or to protect our great country or its freedom."

Backlash was strong and swift.

"Calling for political violence to stop the teaching of accurate history in our schools is what fascism looks like," commented Indivisible's Sarah Dohl.

"Trump doesn’t want a political party. He wants an army. He’s a TV terrorist yes. But he’s also a real fascist," wrote Condé Nast Legal Affairs Editor Luke Zaleski. "Attacking the Capitol, waiting, calling it off, then telling them he loved them after they terrorized the country and got his message across was a kind of a hint, folks."

Zaleski later added: "Trump is a traitor and political mob boss."

Civil-rights lawyer Subodh Chandra described Trump's remarks as a "call to a violent race war. Over nothing but the teaching of our actual history. (CRT is not taught in public schools.)"

"Donald Trump," said Moms Demand Action founder Shannon Watts, "who seems to be in the running for 2024, tells a nation awash in guns to kill or be killed in order to stop anyone from 'hating our country.'"

"Scenes from a slow civil war," observed Vanity Fair contributing editor Jeff Sharlet, who exposed the international right-wing Christian fundamentalist theocratic organization known as The Family.

"What does this mean?" asked Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy professor Don Moynihan. "If you are a teacher in a state you probably feel less and less safe by the extremist nature of this rhetoric."

"Encouraging his fanboys to commit political violence again. Why is he still at large?" asked Salon's Bob Cesca.

https://www.rawstory.com/tv-terrorist-donald-trump-blasted-for-telling-followers-they-must-lay-down-their-very-lives-to-defend-against-crt/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4836 on: March 14, 2022, 01:14:28 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4837 on: March 14, 2022, 01:24:25 PM »
Russia Doesn’t Need Trolls This Time
Bioweapons conspiracy promoted by likely suspects.



During the Cold War, the Soviet Union invested heavily in its global disinformation and propaganda efforts. And back in 2016, the Russians had to go to the trouble of creating a troll farm to push their divisive messages to the American audience. But today, they needn’t go to such lengths: Plenty of prominent right-wing media figures in the United States are pushing out Vladimir Putin’s propaganda for him.

It didn’t happen overnight. Recall how the Russia-sympathizing, Q-adjacent, Trump-loving MAGA media machine first pilloried Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s election meddling. Russia wasn’t responsible, they said—a computer server in Ukraine ran the operation. Then, in 2020, they accused Ukrainian officials of withholding dirt on Joe Biden’s family. Now they allege that the United States is funding bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine and our government is covering it up.

Make a Venn Diagram of the people pushing each of those three narratives and you’ll find they overlap almost completely. It’s all the same people: fringe Internet figures, Fox News hosts, Steve Bannon and his acolytes, Marjorie Tayor Greene caucus members, and the millions of people who love them.

Most of these people claim to be free-thinking contrarians. But their accusations, questions, and conclusions about the United States, Russia, and Ukraine always seem to go one way: The United States and Ukraine are somehow wrong, and the Russians have their reasons for waging war. If you don’t believe that, it’s only because all the Democrats are lying to you. (Well, all the Democrats except for 2022 CPAC special guest Tulsi Gabbard, anyway.)

Before we dig into the Russian disinformation about supposed U.S. bioweapons in Ukraine, let’s put some facts on the record: Both the United States and the Soviet Union had biological weapons programs. The American program lasted for about a quarter-century and was shut down by President Nixon before the United States signed on to the Biological Weapons Convention. The Soviet bioweapons program dwarfed the U.S. program—and long after the USSR signed on to the Bioweapons Convention, the Soviet program continued its work in secret.  The Americans did not operate bioweapons labs in Ukraine, but the Soviets did—although the research conducted in Ukraine, which involved plague, was not offensive but defensive. The United States does, however, now provide funding to some labs in Ukraine as part of the Biological Threat Reduction Program; such “biological defense” research is intended to help protect against disease outbreaks whether “deliberate, accidental, or natural.”

Russia has long promoted outlandish claims about supposed U.S.-funded biological weapons killing off pigs and unleashing killer mosquitoes. Old KGB agents used to lie that American research labs created the AIDS virus, too. The idea of U.S.-funded Ukrainian bioweapons labs began to circulate on fringe websites as Putin’s Ukraine invasion got underway. But it was a question by a U.S. senator—and a less than perfectly clear answer by an American official—that gave the conspiracy theories new life.

During a March 8 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Sen. Marco Rubio asked Victoria Nuland, the under secretary of state for political affairs, “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?” She answered that Ukraine has “biological research facilities” and expressed concern about Russian forces taking them over.

Rubio then reminded Nuland that Russian propagandists are pushing narratives about Ukrainians unleashing biological weapons in coordination with NATO. He asked her: “If there is a biological or chemical weapon incident or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that, 100 percent, it would be the Russians that would be behind it?”

Nuland replied, “There is no doubt in my mind, senator. And it is classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they are planning to do themselves.”

MAGA media figures seized upon this exchange as confirmation of something nefarious going on in Ukraine. Never mind that Nuland never said anything about Ukraine having bioweapons labs. Biological labs, bioweapons labs—whatever, samesies!

Donald Trump Jr. tweeted, “Well that went from conspiracy theory to senate testimony in about 6 days… It used to take six months to go from conspiracy theory to fact.” Fox News ratings king Tucker Carlson took the non-story to primetime. And, boy, did it play well in Russia. Carlson’s commentary is so Kremlin-friendly that, according to a memo obtained by Mother Jones, Russian officials have ordered their state-run media outlets to feature his clips.

In a lengthy monologue, Carlson said:

"Under oath in an open committee hearing, [Victoria] Nuland just confirmed that the Russian disinformation they’ve been telling us for days is a lie and a conspiracy theory and crazy and immoral to believe is, in fact, totally and completely true.

Woah, you don’t hear things like that every day in Washington. Talk about a showstopper and a dozen questions instantly jump to mind. What exactly are they doing in these secret Ukrainian bio labs? Ukraine is the poorest country in Europe. It’s hardly a hotbed of biomedical research. We’re assuming these weren’t pharmaceutical labs, probably not developing new leukemia drugs. From your answer, [Victoria] Nuland, we would assume because you all but said it, that there’s a military application to this research, that they were working on bioweapons. Again, your answer suggests that.

Why would we fund something like that in Ukraine, and why didn’t you secure the contents of these bio labs before the Russians arrived as you knew they would? And then why did you go out of your way to lie to the American public about all of this? If the “research materials” in these labs were to escape somehow and you seem very concerned about that, what would be the effect on Ukraine and then on the rest of the world? How can we prepare for the consequences of that, this thing that you’re worried about? Shouldn’t we be preparing? Because as it turns out, we’ve just spent the last two years living with the pathogen that began in another foreign bio lab funded by the United States government secretly."


Yes, one could have guessed that the same people who blamed Dr. Fauci for the coronavirus might try to find some other government bureaucrats to blame for Putin’s war. This time, according to Carlson, “Dangerous biological agents remain, thanks to the Biden administration, unsecured in a chaotic war zone.”

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, another Fauci hater-turned-bioweapons truther, retweeted a piece about Nuland’s testimony from Glenn Greenwald, calling it a “serious admission, under oath, from a person who would know.” Referring to Nuland, Greenwald’s piece declared that the “neocon’s confession sheds critical light on the U.S. role in Ukraine, and raises vital questions about these labs that deserve answers.”

This is the big story in their minds. Not the Russian invasion and the unfolding humanitarian disaster but the Russian disinformation about bioweapons, which provides a cudgel for whacking the Biden administration—no matter how bogus the claims.

Liz Cheney aptly dubbed the Republican figures who keep aligning with Russia “the Putin wing of the GOP,” though there is some debate whether it’s the party’s dominant wing. Most Republicans seem to be uniting around the cause of the Ukrainians.

Too bad it’s not the Republicans running the party, though.

Sean Hannity shows the conundrum. He seemed pretty upset about Putin’s war and has suggested someone assassinate Putin. The Fox News talker sat down with Donald Trump last Thursday and, in perfect keeping with his role of being more a public relations adviser than a journalist, Hannity made repeated attempts to goad Trump into denouncing the Russian leader.

Hannity’s efforts were for naught, though. Trump wouldn’t do it, which should have been expected, given Trump’s long-established pattern of sidling alongside Putin. (Remember Helsinki?) As long as Trump is the acknowledged head of the Republican party, his admiration for Putin is something that Republicans, including Hannity, will have to continue to accept.

Which doesn’t seem to be much of a problem at all for the younger, very online MAGA Republicans.

GOP Rep. Madison Cawthorn, for example, is perfectly comfortable trashing Ukraine. He told donors that “Zelensky is a thug,” and “Remember that the Ukrainian government is incredibly corrupt and is incredibly evil and has been pushing woke ideologies.”

Hardly anyone blinks when the Daily Wire’s Candace Owens tweets stuff like: “WE are at fault” for Russia’s invasion and every American who “wants to know what’s *actually* going on in Russia and Ukraine” should read the transcript of Putin’s speech to the Russian Federation Security Council.

The only thing better for Putin would be to make Americans read him in the original Russian.

It’s not a coincidence that two major scandals of the Trump era–the Mueller investigation and Trump’s first impeachment–involved Russian interference and Ukraine. Or that Trump went on to pardon members of his inner circle ensnared in the Russia probe, such as his former campaign manager Paul Manafort and former national security advisor Mike Flynn. All of these characters belong to the same story.

Flynn is now on Telegram, pushing the predictable party line: “I was told that biolabs in Ukraine was a conspiracy theory yet here we are. They are now admitting it openly.”

Fellow Trump pardonee-turned-podcaster Steve Bannon, ever the political entrepreneur, is channeling the conspiracy into direct political action. His demand: “No Republican should vote for any money on Ukraine, zero dollars until we know exactly what is going on with the labs.”

None of this goes to say these men, or the others parroting similar lines, bear any responsibility for Putin’s war crimes in Ukraine. But it’s ghastly how eager they are to latch on to Putin’s version of events to score cheap points against Democrats and advance their own interests.

https://www.thebulwark.com/russia-doesnt-need-trolls-this-time/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4838 on: March 14, 2022, 01:42:04 PM »
'Party of Treason': GOP lawmakers face questions over viral Russian ad



The Republican Party is being labeled as the "Party of Treason” in a new, scathing political ad chronicling all that has transpired since Russia invaded Ukraine.

According to HuffPost, the ad was released by Really American, a progressive political action committee (PAC). The video highlights Independence Day 2018 when several Republican lawmakers' traveled to Moscow to visit the Kremlin.

With the video, the PAC tweeted, "A day after the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed Russia interfered in our elections, 8 Republicans flew to Russia for a photo-op. Now they're blaming Biden for the invasion of Ukraine while repeating Kremlin talking points."

Although the trip was reportedly intended to address Russian interference, the video notes that Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), "downplayed said established threat just days later."

The video's narrator posed a number of compelling questions to Republican lawmakers asking: "why Republicans have 'consistently taken' the side of Russian President Vladimir Putin by, among other things, voting to block election security bills and backing Donald Trump for threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine in exchange for dirt on Joe Biden, misconduct that led to the first impeachment of the former president."

The narrator concluded by saying, “Putin has shown his goal is to destabilize Western democracy from Ukraine to the U.S. We can’t allow his puppets to sink their claws deeper into our government.”

In just a short period of time, the video has gone viral. Since its release on Thursday, March 10, it has received more than 850,000 views as it continues to circulate on social media.

Watch video here:

A day after the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed Russia interfered in our elections, 8 Republicans flew to Russia for a photo-op. Now they're blaming Biden for the invasion of Ukraine, while repeating Kremlin talking points.


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5387
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4839 on: March 14, 2022, 03:02:13 PM »
'Party of Treason': GOP lawmakers face questions over viral Russian ad



The Republican Party is being labeled as the "Party of Treason” in a new, scathing political ad chronicling all that has transpired since Russia invaded Ukraine.

According to HuffPost, the ad was released by Really American, a progressive political action committee (PAC). The video highlights Independence Day 2018 when several Republican lawmakers' traveled to Moscow to visit the Kremlin.

With the video, the PAC tweeted, "A day after the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed Russia interfered in our elections, 8 Republicans flew to Russia for a photo-op. Now they're blaming Biden for the invasion of Ukraine while repeating Kremlin talking points."

Although the trip was reportedly intended to address Russian interference, the video notes that Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), "downplayed said established threat just days later."

The video's narrator posed a number of compelling questions to Republican lawmakers asking: "why Republicans have 'consistently taken' the side of Russian President Vladimir Putin by, among other things, voting to block election security bills and backing Donald Trump for threatening to withhold military aid to Ukraine in exchange for dirt on Joe Biden, misconduct that led to the first impeachment of the former president."

The narrator concluded by saying, “Putin has shown his goal is to destabilize Western democracy from Ukraine to the U.S. We can’t allow his puppets to sink their claws deeper into our government.”

In just a short period of time, the video has gone viral. Since its release on Thursday, March 10, it has received more than 850,000 views as it continues to circulate on social media.

Watch video here:

A day after the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed Russia interfered in our elections, 8 Republicans flew to Russia for a photo-op. Now they're blaming Biden for the invasion of Ukraine, while repeating Kremlin talking points.


This is simply a false narrative in which you are trying to validate your political bias.  The republicans have been out in front of the criticism of Russia while Biden lagged behind.  It was  republicans that advocated for sanctions BEFORE the invasion began while Biden vacationed at the beach.  Biden put his own political interests ahead of those of the people of Ukraine.  It was republicans who warned that relying on oil purchases from Russia and Iran put America and Europe at risk.  Biden put his woke agenda ahead of the interests of the world.  It was republicans who advocated an end to the purchase of Russian oil while Biden was concerned with the gas prices.  It is republicans who are advocating providing Ukraine with Polish MIGs to defend themselves while Biden is fearful that will PROVOKE Putin.  It was President Trump who condemned Putin without any ambiguity.  It was Lindsey Graham who advocated the removal of Putin from power.  Biden knocked off for the weekend for a nap.

"The Russian attack on Ukraine is appalling, it's an outrage and an atrocity that should never have been allowed to occur.  We are praying for the proud people of Ukraine. God bless them all."

President Donald J. Trump (statement on 02/26/22)


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4839 on: March 14, 2022, 03:02:13 PM »