The Lone-Gunman Theory Collapses without the Single-Bullet Theory

[John Iacoletti]

All major investigative bodies pointed to Oswald as killer.
A damn solid basis in my estimation.

Your appeal to authority fallacy is noted.

Your history of arrogantly dissing the way others express
themselves is firmly established here:

A) Brewer's 'looked funny' comment
B) Euins's 'bald spot' comment
C) Markham's offbeat way of expression

There's nothing arrogant about pointing out that these things don't constitute evidence that Oswald shot JFK.

[John Iacoletti]

Feel free to name your... oh, never mind.
Sigh. Been there, tried that.

Yeah, because that does nothing to demonstrate that the WC conclusions are supported by the evidence.  It's just shifting the burden of proof.

The WC said it, you believe it and that settles it.

[Bill Chapman]

Your appeal to authority fallacy is noted.

There's nothing arrogant about pointing out that these things don't constitute evidence that Oswald shot JFK.

Your LOLing Brewer/Euins/Markham means of expression remains noted.
Your posting history of isolating the single-from-the-whole remains noted.

[John Iacoletti]

Your LOLing Brewer/Euins/Markham means of expression remains noted

Back to the trademark incomprehensible gibberish.

I never "LOLed" anybody's "means of expression".

[Bill Chapman]

Back to the trademark incomprehensible gibberish.

I never "LOLed" anybody's "means of expression".

OMG

[John Iacoletti]

What I "LOL" is people who desperately want to make Euins' "bald spot" a receding hairline, Markham's 6 negative responses a "yes", and Brewer's "looked scared" a probable cause for a search and arrest for murder.

[Bill Chapman]

Yeah, because that does nothing to demonstrate that the WC conclusions are supported by the evidence.  It's just shifting the burden of proof.

The WC said it, you believe it and that settles it.

Sounds like your (former) TAE mantra.

CTer standard of proof goalpost-shifting has yet to convince yours truly of anything other than that there's a whole lot of dodging goin' on in the CTer bubble.

[John Iacoletti]

Sounds like your (former) TAE mantra.

I didn't have a former TAE mantra.  Yet another flawed Chapman babble.

CTer standard of proof goalpost-shifting has yet to convince yours truly of anything other than that there's a whole lot of dodging goin' on in the CTer bubble.

What "dodging"?

You've demonstrated that all it takes to "convince" you of something is for an authority to come to a conclusion and you don't care about the details.