A Tale of Two Shirts

[Bill Chapman]

That’s not reasoned discussion. It’s obscure unsourced references to things that you just accept as true. Reasoned discussion would involve providing a single example of Oswald ever using “Hidell” as an alias for himself prior to 11/22, or any mention of this selective service card in any interview or police document prior to the discovery of the Klein’s order.

There’s no freedom of expression here. It’s a private forum.

Why? I never claimed otherwise.

Bah, humbug. This is an open forum of Oswald-lovers v Oswald-accusers, not an ivory-tower formal debate.

I've already stated that those aliases are part of the assassination-lore whether you like or not, ripe for a bit of fun from those who express themselves here in a light-hearted manner at times.

[John Iacoletti]

Bah, humbug. This is an open forum of Oswald-lovers v Oswald-accusers, not an ivory-tower formal debate.

I've already stated that those aliases are part of the assassination-lore whether you like or not, ripe for a bit of fun from those who express themselves here in a light-hearted manner at times.

Questioning the basis of your stating your "lore" as facts doesn't make one an "Oswald lover".  That's just your smug and condescending way of trying to weasel out of responsibility for substantiating your claims.

[Bill Chapman]

Questioning the basis of your stating your "lore" as facts doesn't make one an "Oswald lover".  That's just your smug and condescending way of trying to weasel out of responsibility for substantiating your claims.

'weasel'
That's soooo clever. And tell us why you think I need to prove something here.

'stating your "lore" as facts'
No, using JFK assassination lore in a manner which, apparently, makes grumpy old men evermore grumpier.

[John Iacoletti]

'weasel'
That's soooo clever. And tell us why you think I need to prove something here.

Because this is a discussion forum, and you keep making unsubstantiated fact claims.

'stating your "lore" as facts'
No, using JFK assassination lore in a manner which, apparently, makes grumpy old men evermore grumpier.

Calling me "grumpy" doesn't substantiate your "lore".

[Bill Chapman]

Because this is a discussion forum, and you keep making unsubstantiated fact claims.

Calling me "grumpy" doesn't substantiate your "lore"

JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in at Beckley as OH Lee
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W

Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing


Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether this is faked or not

[Walt Cakebread]

JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in to Beckley as OH Lee
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell*
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W

Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing

*

The first thing any competent researcher would do would determine if either of the cards were authentic Selective Service "Draft Cards"

Neither of the cards shown are an actual Selective Service document

[Bill Chapman]

Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether the cards are faked or not

[Jerry Freeman]

What should happen to this thread.