A Tale of Two Shirts

[Bill Chapman]

What should happen to this thread.

Feel free to go elsewhere

[Jerry Freeman]

Feel free to go elsewhere

You can go to elsewhere

[Bill Chapman]

You can go to elsewhere

Buh-bye. And don't have a nice day.

[Martin Weidmann]

JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in at Beckley as OH Lee
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell
JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W

Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing


Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether this is faked or not

Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether this is faked or not

And you could care less if it is faked or not, right?

[John Iacoletti]

JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald signed in at Beckley as OH Lee

And there's no evidence of that beyond Mrs. Johnson's say-so, and some unidentifiable writing on a "register" that looks nothing like a register.

JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald pretended to be Alek Hidell

There's no evidence of that whatsoever.

JFK assassination lore has it that Oswald (aka Dirty Harvey) used a S&W

Or that.

Fair game in any man's discussion
Fair game for a proof-of-concept undertaking
Fair game for some good-natured spoofing

Making a series of unsubstantiated claims is not a "discussion".  Especially when you steadfastly refuse to ever substantiate anything you say (often incorrectly) about the case.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald as Hidell is in the annals of JFK Assassination Lore whether the cards are faked or not

No, you specifically asserted that he "pretended to be Hidell".

[Bill Chapman]

No, you specifically asserted that he "pretended to be Hidell"

You lot only call a discussion a 'discussion' when people agree with you

And are you claiming the cards are faked by someone other than Oswald?

[Bill Chapman]

And there's no evidence of that beyond Mrs. Johnson's say-so, and some unidentifiable writing on a "register" that looks nothing like a register.

There's no evidence of that whatsoever.

Or that.

Making a series of unsubstantiated claims is not a "discussion".  Especially when you steadfastly refuse to ever substantiate anything you say (often incorrectly) about the case.

Nobody named Oswald was signed into Beckley.