The Nix Illusion

[John Tonkovich]

You revived the thread to make you're nonsense comment.
If you want to learn something new learn how to count - it's 14 pages.

So you were already aware of the effect I'm calling the Nix Illusion.
Why don't I believe that?
Why don't you point out where you came across this info.

Maybe you learned nothing new because you know it all already.

you're.
Sloppy.
Like your video. Inaccurate.  As always.

[Dan O'meara]

you're.
Sloppy.
Like your video. Inaccurate.  As always.

Yet another devastating critique.
The video in the OP I rustled up in a few seconds is accurate enough to demonstrate the illusion researchers such as yourself have been fooled by.
It's accurate enough to show this particular aspect of your "alterationist" belief is 
It's something a child could've figured out and it says a lot about you that you won't accept such an obviously correct explanation.

[Zeon Mason]

If there is an angle of 20 degree or more of Nix camera relative to the south east side of the JFK limo at the frame location on Elm st as posted by Mr. Omeara, then why is there no apparent perspective rear side of the limo visible?

There is only what appears to be the small projection of the chrome bumper and the sharp edge of the south facing side of the limo.

Is there any discernible geometric area to the right side of this rear sharp profile of the limo that can be outlined to show that the rear side of the limo is there and is being obscured by shadow?