Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The First Shot  (Read 165896 times)

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #304 on: November 23, 2020, 06:30:29 AM »
Advertisement
If the 6th floor gunman (or rifle demonstrator?)  at TSBD SE window was hiding out of LOS until after JFK limo has fully turned on ELM st and has passed by the window and past the traffic light, then IMO there is only approx about 3 to 4 sec until limo is at the Z160 location on Elm St.

IMO it’s therefore more probable if there was a shot fired as early as Z160  by a lone shooter from the TSBD SN window that it was an accidental unaimed shot DURING his effort to get himself onto crouched kneeling firing position.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The First Shot
« Reply #304 on: November 23, 2020, 06:30:29 AM »


Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3160
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #305 on: November 23, 2020, 06:50:26 AM »
If the 6th floor gunman (or rifle demonstrator?)  at TSBD SE window was hiding out of LOS until after JFK limo has fully turned on ELM st and has passed by the window and past the traffic light, then IMO there is only approx about 3 to 4 sec until limo is at the Z160 location on Elm St.

IMO it’s therefore more probable if there was a shot fired as early as Z160  by a lone shooter from the TSBD SN window that it was an accidental unaimed shot DURING his effort to get himself onto crouched kneeling firing position.

This scenario is not 'probable'.
That he would have his finger on the trigger while getting into position seems incredibly unlikely (IMO)

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #306 on: November 23, 2020, 07:04:37 AM »
Improbable even more when considering the WC theory that the tilted unstable box on window ledge was used as a rifle rest, which in combination with window only open approx 15.5 inches, leaves a questionable difficulty for the rifle to be some downward at the Z160-170 location on Elm st, let alone the awkward position which precludes a kneeling postion

So what to make the whatever it was stimulus that cause the Jackie head turn between 160-170?

Possibly a 2nd gunman who tried a1st shot from Daltex, and missed because the suppresser caused the
inaccuracy?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The First Shot
« Reply #306 on: November 23, 2020, 07:04:37 AM »


Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3160
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #307 on: November 23, 2020, 07:37:59 AM »
Improbable even more when considering the WC theory that the tilted unstable box on window ledge was used as a rifle rest, which in combination with window only open approx 15.5 inches, leaves a questionable difficulty for the rifle to be some downward at the Z160-170 location on Elm st, let alone the awkward position which precludes a kneeling postion

So what to make the whatever it was stimulus that cause the Jackie head turn between 160-170?

Possibly a 2nd gunman who tried a1st shot from Daltex, and missed because the suppresser caused the
inaccuracy?

Here's another possibility.
As the Z-film hits z160 there is nobody stood to the right of the limo as we look at it, it's a wide open space with hardly anybody there so Jackie looks to her right, where there are still some people. It's a simple head turn that is not caused by anybody shooting.
And if it was from a 'suppressed' shot why would that cause her to turn?
Thee is no reason to assume a second gunman from her head turn.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1402
    • SPMLaw
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #308 on: November 23, 2020, 07:38:37 AM »
Am I wrong to believe the limo was obscured by the oak tree around z160?
The car was never fully obscured by the tree and neither was the President. Oswald would have been able to track him easily while the car passed under the branches.  The Secret Service did a re-enactment in early December 1963 and took a film of a stand-in car and occupants. You can see that the car is about to pass under the first tree branches when JFK was just past the west retaining wall:

That appears to be about where the President was when Croft took his z163 photo, which he said was enough time before the first shot that he was able to wind his camera and take another at the moment of the first shot (unfortunately that frame did not turn out).

JFK was a possible target from the SN at and after this point:

when JFK was opposite the lamppost and about 10 feet from the Thornton Freeway sign.  That corresponds to Zapruder frame 190 by my calculation.

In doing their reenactment in May 1964 the FBI did not take into account how the tree looked from the SN on November 22/63. The SS film shows that.  For some reason which is not explained in the WC material, the FBI did not realize that JFK was quite visible after z190.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2020, 07:42:09 AM by Andrew Mason »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The First Shot
« Reply #308 on: November 23, 2020, 07:38:37 AM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3778
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #309 on: November 23, 2020, 02:03:10 PM »
If the 6th floor gunman (or rifle demonstrator?)  at TSBD SE window was hiding out of LOS until after JFK limo has fully turned on ELM st and has passed by the window and past the traffic light, then IMO there is only approx about 3 to 4 sec until limo is at the Z160 location on Elm St.

IMO it’s therefore more probable if there was a shot fired as early as Z160  by a lone shooter from the TSBD SN window that it was an accidental unaimed shot DURING his effort to get himself onto crouched kneeling firing position.


Seated on the box on the floor and sitting up straight, he was out of the line of sight. Just leaning his upper torso forward (while staying seated) he was in a good position to aim and fire as the limo traveled away from him down Elm Street. The seated position is the most stable one and doesn’t require any awkward, time consuming movements to get into a kneeling position. Therefore I believe that he stayed seated on the box for the shooting.

I don’t believe that he would have had an opportunity to practice aiming at moving vehicles in the kill zone with the actual rifle without risking being seen aiming the rifle and possibly bringing unwanted attention to himself. But it is reasonable to believe that he could have mentally practiced doing this. He could have kept the rifle at his side and low enough that it could not be seen from the viewpoint of the bystanders outside and below until the limo traveled into his selected kill zone.

When the time came to pick up the actual rifle and aim, I believe that it was most likely the first time he did this with the rifle actually in hand. The pipe (appears to me to be an electrical conduit) closest to the window would have been very close to his left elbow position if he was seated and aiming down Elm Street. However, he most likely had not realized this due to a lack of actual practice with the rifle. It is possible that his left elbow could have collided with the conduit while he was bringing the rifle up into position and starting to aim. If this happened, the elbow collision might have caused an inadvertent shot to be fired before he had fully aimed the rifle.

A somewhat similar scenario is possible if he was aiming and tracking the limo as it passed right below the window. However, in this case the top box in the stack below the window would have been the item in the way of the rifle barrel. Some people believe that they see some movement in the window in the Hughes film. So I don’t rule this possibility out.

However, I believe the most likely theory to be the first one in which the conduit is the cause. One reason for this preference is the bullet marks on the manhole cover on the south side of Elm Street and the curb near the position of Tague. And Tague’s injury of course.

Then again, Max Holland’s demonstration regarding the spent shells distribution is interesting and coincides with the shot being made while the limo is below the traffic signal (from the sniper’s nest viewpoint). If this is the reason for the spent shells distribution pattern, then interference from the top box could be the reason the shot misssed (in lieu of it hitting the traffic signal).
« Last Edit: November 23, 2020, 02:09:08 PM by Charles Collins »

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3160
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #310 on: November 23, 2020, 05:45:39 PM »
The car was never fully obscured by the tree and neither was the President. Oswald would have been able to track him easily while the car passed under the branches.  The Secret Service did a re-enactment in early December 1963 and took a film of a stand-in car and occupants. You can see that the car is about to pass under the first tree branches when JFK was just past the west retaining wall:

That appears to be about where the President was when Croft took his z163 photo, which he said was enough time before the first shot that he was able to wind his camera and take another at the moment of the first shot (unfortunately that frame did not turn out).

JFK was a possible target from the SN at and after this point:

when JFK was opposite the lamppost and about 10 feet from the Thornton Freeway sign.  That corresponds to Zapruder frame 190 by my calculation.

In doing their reenactment in May 1964 the FBI did not take into account how the tree looked from the SN on November 22/63. The SS film shows that.  For some reason which is not explained in the WC material, the FBI did not realize that JFK was quite visible after z190.

Thanks Andrew

Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: The First Shot
« Reply #311 on: November 24, 2020, 04:16:18 AM »
The first shot landed base first in the back - not neck - and did not penetrate very deeply.
Why would a bullet hit base first?
Would a bullet "tumble" if it hit a tree branch?
Points to ponder.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The First Shot
« Reply #311 on: November 24, 2020, 04:16:18 AM »