Can't say I'm spotting Nix to be honest Duncan, but what I did spot was the lamp-post I'd mentioned seen in Nix:
Just from eye-balling it, judging from the relative positions of the lamp-post and the bottom of the stairs in the distance, I'd say Nix was filming from a position slightly west of Hughes (I also got the impression Nix was stood slightly west of Bronson as well). Nix's position was on the south side of Main Street, slightly west of the south peristyle and when we look on Roberdeau's 'worthless' map, that is exactly where he is positioned.
Just returning briefly to the general subject of this thread, I've always wondered what the point of altering the Zapruder film was. To hide evidence of a second gunman? If so, how could "they" leave in JFK's 'back and to the left' head and body movement? Surely any right-minded person would see the effects of a shot from the right front, which is exactly what happened when the film was finally made public. Surely this is the clearest evidence of a conspiracy there could be, what's the point of any alterations whilst leaving this glaring give-away in there.
I find it baffling that those fighting hardest to show the Z-film was altered are those who believe there was a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. The Z-film is the best evidence there is of a conspiracy
yet it is undermined by those who wish to show the alterations are evidence of conspiracy.Go figure.
