On The Trail Of Delusion

[Mark A. Oblazney]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/did-a-homosexual-conspiracy-kill-jfk

Did a Homosexual Conspiracy Kill JFK?

In April 1967, a German Magazine published an article purportedly written by Jim Garrison about the homosexual conspiracy that killed JFK. I now present the entire article and a translation. But did Jim Garrison write the article? This is the first of a multi-part series to examine this very interesting piece of writing.

Fred Litwin
www.onthetrailofdelusion.com

Manuel ??  Oh, say it isn't true, senor !!  These Tales of Yankee Power never end !!!  Por Dios !!

[Gerry Down]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/did-a-homosexual-conspiracy-kill-jfk

Did a Homosexual Conspiracy Kill JFK?

In April 1967, a German Magazine published an article purportedly written by Jim Garrison about the homosexual conspiracy that killed JFK. I now present the entire article and a translation. But did Jim Garrison write the article? This is the first of a multi-part series to examine this very interesting piece of writing.

Fred Litwin
www.onthetrailofdelusion.com

Hi Fred,

I started a forum thread about your book. Here it is:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2985.0.html

Could you tell a bit about your book specifically in the sense of how it is different from "False Witness" by Patricia Lambert?

Thanks,
Gerry

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/fletcher-prouty-s-interview-with-the-arrb-part-eight

This is part eight of my series on Fletcher Prouty's interview with the ARRB.

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/david-lifton-writes-to-oliver-stone

Published by permission of David Lifton, who pointed out that his disagreements with Stone and Garrison were not about the existence of a conspiracy or the importance of foreign-policy issues to the assassination.  This letter was published ten years after his book, Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy.

[Fred Litwin]

Is this Document the Smoking Gun on the Richard Case Nagell Story?
Dick Russell, in the first edition of his book The Man Who Knew Too Much, included one page from a document that he considered the "smoking gun." I publish all four pages today, and it is not a smoking gun in the slightest. If this is the only documentation, Russell can cite, then he truly has no case.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story

[Gerry Down]

What's notable is that the claim Nagell told to the Army in 1969 (as can be seen on page 2 of the 4 page document here: https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story ) is that this claim is quiet simple. It does not have all the bells and whistles it does when it shows up in Russells book (ie a photo of Oswald and Nagell together being stashed away in a Switzerland bank vault, tape recordings of Oswald, and Nagells order to kill Oswald).

Is it possible that the simple version Nagell gives to the army in 1969 is the truth and then Nagell inflated this simple story when he told it to Russell in order to, as is stated at the end of that 4 page document, to embarrass the CIA?

[Walt Cakebread]

What's notable is that the claim Nagell told to the Army in 1969 (as can be seen on page 2 of the 4 page document here: https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-on-the-richard-case-nagell-story ) is that this claim is quiet simple. It does not have all the bells and whistles it does when it shows up in Russells book (ie a photo of Oswald and Nagell together being stashed away in a Switzerland bank vault, tape recordings of Oswald, and Nagells order to kill Oswald).

Is it possible that the simple version Nagell gives to the army in 1969 is the truth and then Nagell inflated this simple story when he told it to Russell in order to, as is stated at the end of that 4 page document, to embarrass the CIA?

The LA TIMES the NY TIMES and others reported that Richard Nagell during his arraignment stated that,  quote... " That The FBI held full responsibility for Kennedy's assassination " Nagell was immediately led out of court by "Federal men" ...unquote

Question.... What was the charge that Nagell was being arraigned on when he said this???

[Fred Litwin]

Why Didn't Richard Case Nagell Testify at Clay Shaw's Trial?
Did somebody throw a grenade at Nagell in New York? Dick Russell has one reason why he didn't testify, Jim Garrison offers another reason. But wait, Richard Case Nagell has a third reason. Does any of this make any sense?

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/why-didn-t-richard-case-nagell-testify-at-clay-shaw-s-trial