Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 94244 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: JFK Revisited Uses Marina Porter to Mislead Viewers
« Reply #448 on: November 23, 2021, 01:45:36 AM »
Advertisement
It's possible but doesn't explain her inconsistent testimony once she finally admitted to taking the photos.

If someone wanted to distance themselves they would play dumb and be inconsistent with their testimony from what they previously stated. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited Uses Marina Porter to Mislead Viewers
« Reply #448 on: November 23, 2021, 01:45:36 AM »


Online Fred Litwin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 363
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #449 on: November 23, 2021, 03:50:18 AM »
Stone's so-called documentary mentions that Shaw was indicted for conspiracy to kill JFK. It's a bit rich in a film that is upset that Oswald did not get a trial, to NOT even mention that Shaw DID get a trial and that he was acquitted.

That is outrageous.

fred

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #450 on: November 23, 2021, 04:06:28 AM »
Stone's so-called documentary mentions that Shaw was indicted for conspiracy to kill JFK. It's a bit rich in a film that is upset that Oswald did not get a trial, to NOT even mention that Shaw DID get a trial and that he was acquitted.

That is outrageous.

fred

Jim Garrison got one mention. Shaw got maybe two mentions.

You seem genuinely disappointed that Stone didn't make another film about Jim Garrison and Clay Shaw.




JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #450 on: November 23, 2021, 04:06:28 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #451 on: November 23, 2021, 04:33:34 AM »
Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
Today is the 58 anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. We should all take some time today to remember his life and the optimism he engendered in Americans. Unfortunately, Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, will be showing today and, once again, he crucifies Clay Shaw, an innocent gay man whose life was ruined by Jim Garrison. Shame on you, Oliver Stone.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/oliver-stone-with-jfk-revisited-crucifies-clay-shaw-once-again

I agree Fred. A lot of people decided to turn this day into a farce with a bogus JFK return and many old conspiracies have been dug up once again and were posted all on Twitter and other media sites. This was one of the worst days in American history and people treat it as a joke. Hopefully members in the forum took the time to reflect on the life and legacy of President Kennedy. All I know is the world would have been a much better place today if President Kennedy wasn't murdered.     

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #452 on: November 23, 2021, 05:55:28 AM »
​Are you questioning this man's qualifications? ... that indeed makes him world renowned in his field of digital image forensics
However...the photograph is analog.
Quote
  He is also called upon by intelligence agencies...
Qualification there for a good team player.
Quote
You are just posting your own personal theory of what you want it to be and dismiss the forensic evidence.
I [as many others have] never considered that Life Oswald photo as being phony and then I saw a Jack White presentation. He was an analog photographer [as I] before the digital world replaced it. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #452 on: November 23, 2021, 05:55:28 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #453 on: November 23, 2021, 06:17:54 AM »
Do you have any forensic evidence that proves the shadow or any of these ​these Backyard photos to be forged or faked?
Not at all. However...regarding expert forensic evidence, a panel of sound engineers, acoustical specialists and various other auditory authorities told the HSCA committee that there is a 95% chance that there was a 4th shot from the knoll area.
A whole lot more than 95% of the only one guy believers completely reject those experts.
I am skeptical.

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #454 on: November 23, 2021, 06:30:02 AM »
However...the photograph is analog. Qualification there for a good team player.I [as many others have] never considered that Life Oswald photo as being phony and then I saw a Jack White presentation. He was an analog photographer [as I] before the digital world replaced it.

Jerry, I previously believed the photos were altered, but after reading this forensic evidence when it came out that totally changed my opinion. That is solid forensic proof that the photos were not altered in anyway. These photos went under the most sophisticated analysis available and nothing showed up that it was altered. I strictly go on evidence and when evidence proves something as a fact,  I will believe that over a previous theory that I held.

I'm always looking for new evidence in this case and if you have real forensic photo analysis evidence to prove these photos are indeed fake then please share it with us. But don't dismiss the evidence of forensic photo analysis that proved these photos to be legit.         

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #455 on: November 23, 2021, 06:39:55 AM »
Not at all. However...regarding expert forensic evidence, a panel of sound engineers, acoustical specialists and various other auditory authorities told the HSCA committee that there is a 95% chance that there was a 4th shot from the knoll area.
A whole lot more than 95% of the only one guy believers completely reject those experts.
I am skeptical.

Nothing wrong with being skeptical and just believing everything that is being told. All I'm saying is when solid evidence is presented then I will believe it over a theory that I previously believed to be true. If anybody can prove the photos  were altered with a similar method then I am always open to looking at that evidence.       

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #455 on: November 23, 2021, 06:39:55 AM »