Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: On The Trail Of Delusion  (Read 78901 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #456 on: November 23, 2021, 12:28:04 AM »
Advertisement
If they're so 'renowned' why can't you name them?
That shadow on the left cheek?...Some kind of freak eclipse I suppose?

I've already did. ​Are you questioning this man's qualifications? 

Farid is known as "the father of digital image forensics" so that indeed makes him world renowned in his field of digital image forensics. He is also called upon by intelligence agencies and news organizations to conduct forensics on photos and digital images. So yes, this man is world renowned in his field.       

You are just posting your own personal theory of what you want it to be and dismiss the forensic evidence. And if you bothered to read the article, the "shadow" went under forensic photo analysis and was determined to be authentic. Even after a rigorous forensic photo analysis you still suggest the shadow was faked.....amazing.       

Do you have any forensic evidence that proves the shadow or any of these ​these Backyard photos to be forged or faked?     

Hany Farid

Hany Farid is an American university professor who specializes in the analysis of digital images, Dean and Head of School for the UC Berkeley School of Information. In addition to teaching, writing, and conducting research, Farid acts as a consultant for non-profits, government agencies, and news organizations. He is the author of the book Photo Forensics.

Farid specializes in image analysis and human perception. He has been called the "father" of digital image forensics by NOVA scienceNOW. He is the recipient of a 2006 Guggenheim Fellowship and a 2002 Sloan Fellowship for his work in the field. Farid was named a lifetime fellow of the National Academy of Inventors in 2016.

Farid has consulted for intelligence agencies, news organizations, courts, and scientific journals seeking to authenticate the validity of images. This is critically important because graphics programs, such as Photoshop, are frequently used to crop and to label figures in scientific publications. Such manipulations can be used to alter or disguise the data. In 2009, after digitally analyzing a photograph of Lee Harvey Oswald holding a rifle and newspaper, Farid published his findings concluding that "the photo almost certainly was not altered". When the 2013 World Press Photo of the Year was alleged as being "fake", Farid spoke out against the allegation and criticized its underlying method, error level analysis.

As of 2018, Farid was a consultant for the Associated Press, Reuters, The New York Times, and the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency.

PhotoDNA is a system that uses robust hashing technology Farid worked on with Microsoft, which is now widely used by Internet companies to stop the spread of content showing exploitation involving children. In late 2015, Farid completed improvements to PhotoDNA that made it capable of analyzing video and audio files besides still images. In 2016, Farid proposed that the technology could be used to stem the spread of terror-related imagery, but there was little interest shown initially by social media companies. In December 2016, Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft announced plans to use PhotoDNA to tackle extremist content such as terrorist recruitment videos or violent terrorist imagery, which was done e.g. to automatically remove al Qaeda videos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hany_Farid
https://cybersecai.com/speaker/hany-farid/

Hany Farid, M.S.’92
Father of Digital Forensics

https://www.albany.edu/ualbanymagazine/fall2017_farid-father-of-digital-forensics.shtml

Podcast: Hany Farid on deep fakes, doctored photos, and disinformation
https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/podcast-hany-farid-on-deep-fakes-doctored-photos-and-disinformation/
« Last Edit: November 23, 2021, 12:31:49 AM by Rick Plant »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #456 on: November 23, 2021, 12:28:04 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: JFK Revisited Uses Marina Porter to Mislead Viewers
« Reply #457 on: November 23, 2021, 01:45:36 AM »
It's possible but doesn't explain her inconsistent testimony once she finally admitted to taking the photos.

If someone wanted to distance themselves they would play dumb and be inconsistent with their testimony from what they previously stated. 

Offline Fred Litwin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #458 on: November 23, 2021, 03:50:18 AM »
Stone's so-called documentary mentions that Shaw was indicted for conspiracy to kill JFK. It's a bit rich in a film that is upset that Oswald did not get a trial, to NOT even mention that Shaw DID get a trial and that he was acquitted.

That is outrageous.

fred

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #458 on: November 23, 2021, 03:50:18 AM »


Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #459 on: November 23, 2021, 04:06:28 AM »
Stone's so-called documentary mentions that Shaw was indicted for conspiracy to kill JFK. It's a bit rich in a film that is upset that Oswald did not get a trial, to NOT even mention that Shaw DID get a trial and that he was acquitted.

That is outrageous.

fred

Jim Garrison got one mention. Shaw got maybe two mentions.

You seem genuinely disappointed that Stone didn't make another film about Jim Garrison and Clay Shaw.




Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #460 on: November 23, 2021, 04:33:34 AM »
Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
Today is the 58 anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. We should all take some time today to remember his life and the optimism he engendered in Americans. Unfortunately, Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, will be showing today and, once again, he crucifies Clay Shaw, an innocent gay man whose life was ruined by Jim Garrison. Shame on you, Oliver Stone.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/oliver-stone-with-jfk-revisited-crucifies-clay-shaw-once-again

I agree Fred. A lot of people decided to turn this day into a farce with a bogus JFK return and many old conspiracies have been dug up once again and were posted all on Twitter and other media sites. This was one of the worst days in American history and people treat it as a joke. Hopefully members in the forum took the time to reflect on the life and legacy of President Kennedy. All I know is the world would have been a much better place today if President Kennedy wasn't murdered.     

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oliver Stone with "JFK Revisited" Crucifies Clay Shaw Once Again
« Reply #460 on: November 23, 2021, 04:33:34 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #461 on: November 23, 2021, 05:55:28 AM »
​Are you questioning this man's qualifications? ... that indeed makes him world renowned in his field of digital image forensics
However...the photograph is analog.
Quote
  He is also called upon by intelligence agencies...
Qualification there for a good team player.
Quote
You are just posting your own personal theory of what you want it to be and dismiss the forensic evidence.
I [as many others have] never considered that Life Oswald photo as being phony and then I saw a Jack White presentation. He was an analog photographer [as I] before the digital world replaced it. 

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #462 on: November 23, 2021, 06:17:54 AM »
Do you have any forensic evidence that proves the shadow or any of these ​these Backyard photos to be forged or faked?
Not at all. However...regarding expert forensic evidence, a panel of sound engineers, acoustical specialists and various other auditory authorities told the HSCA committee that there is a 95% chance that there was a 4th shot from the knoll area.
A whole lot more than 95% of the only one guy believers completely reject those experts.
I am skeptical.

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #463 on: November 23, 2021, 06:30:02 AM »
However...the photograph is analog. Qualification there for a good team player.I [as many others have] never considered that Life Oswald photo as being phony and then I saw a Jack White presentation. He was an analog photographer [as I] before the digital world replaced it.

Jerry, I previously believed the photos were altered, but after reading this forensic evidence when it came out that totally changed my opinion. That is solid forensic proof that the photos were not altered in anyway. These photos went under the most sophisticated analysis available and nothing showed up that it was altered. I strictly go on evidence and when evidence proves something as a fact,  I will believe that over a previous theory that I held.

I'm always looking for new evidence in this case and if you have real forensic photo analysis evidence to prove these photos are indeed fake then please share it with us. But don't dismiss the evidence of forensic photo analysis that proved these photos to be legit.         

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: JFK Revisited: Were the Oswald Backyard Photographs Faked?
« Reply #463 on: November 23, 2021, 06:30:02 AM »