On The Trail Of Delusion

[Bill Chapman]

Fake genius.

Fake artist.

Fake quotes.

Next?

Fake genius.
_Just ordinary, until now
  You lot retain 'Almost'

Fake artist.
_Graphic design is one of the arts

Fake quotes.
_Artistic license

Next?
_You are, troll

[Bill Chapman]

« Last Edit: Today at 01:42:22 PM by Bill Chapman »

Edit?

ROFL

Edit?
_Sure, but I charge $250/per hour

ROFL
_Still throwing up, I see
  Best see a vet

[Richard Smith]

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/part-1b.html

The Backyard pictures do not prove that Oswald killed JFK.
In retrospect...being plastered on the cover of LIFE magazine with the caption 'weapons used to kill Kennedy and Officer Tippit' instilled prejudice in the minds of Americans no matter the questions and no matter the circumstantial evidence.

Posing with the murder weapons while looking like some type of political loon has that impact.  Another example of arguing that the evidence against Oswald is so overwhelming that it can only mean he is innocent.  LOL.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Posing with the murder weapons while looking like some type of political loon has that impact.  Another example of arguing that the evidence against Oswald is so overwhelming that it can only mean he is innocent.  LOL.

The problem with the photos is not that they showed a unstable crackpot posing like this - look at this guy! - no the problem is that news magazines ran the photos and poisoned opinion against him.

Suggestion: if you don't want people to think you're an unstable person then don't pose for photos that make you look like an unstable person.

Poor Oswald. Everybody was against him. Steam fitters, waitresses, warehouse workers, cab drivers, secretaries, shoe salesmen, ticket takers, used car salesmen.......No wonder the guy didn't like America - we were all out to get him.

[Jon Banks]

The problem with the photos is not that they showed a unstable crackpot posing like this - look at this guy! - no the problem is that news magazines ran the photos and poisoned opinion against him.

Suggestion: if you don't want people to think you're an unstable person then don't pose for photos that make you look like an unstable person.

How unusual or unstable is it for someone who lives in Texas to take a picture posing with guns? I would think that sort of thing is normal down there given how rifles and hunting are a big part of their culture.

It only looks incriminating after Oswald is accused of shooting the President. Short of that, there's nothing inherently bad about the backyard photos.

[Richard Smith]

How unusual or unstable is it for someone who lives in Texas to take a picture posing with guns? I would think that sort of thing is normal down there given how rifles and hunting are a big part of their culture.

It only looks incriminating after Oswald is accused of shooting the President. Short of that, there's nothing inherently bad about the backyard photos.

You believe that it was "normal" for people in Texas during the 1960s to have pictures taken of themselves holding guns while displaying Commie literature?  While dressed in all black.

[Jon Banks]

You believe that it was "normal" for people in Texas during the 1960s to have pictures taken of themselves holding guns while displaying Commie literature?  While dressed in all black.

The Commie literature thing is unique for someone from the South (Marxists were extremely rare in the Jim Crow South)but not incriminating.

The only way something like that becomes incriminating relevant is if the person in the photos is accused of a violent crime.

[Richard Smith]

The Commie literature thing is unique for someone from the South (Marxists were extremely rare in the Jim Crow South)but not incriminating.

The only way something like that becomes incriminating relevant is if the person in the photos is accused of a violent crime.

I'm not exactly sure what other context something could ever be deemed incriminating unless someone is accused of a crime.  The BY photos are incriminating in the context of the JFK assassination.  They are not normal photos like other sane people in Texas would take.  Of course no one would ever have any cause to see them had Oswald not committed a high-profile crime.  He would just be another anonymous oddball in the world (of which there are many) but I'm not sure what relevance that has in this context.