On The Trail Of Delusion

[Jon Banks]

The quantity of information has certainly increased (theories, web sites, biased mockumentaries) but it's been at the expense of quality.

More information is good actually.

Adults and experts can make up their own minds and decide for themselves.

Would be no problem if "JFK Revisited" commended Gerald Ford for clarifying and making more accurate a passage in a draft of the Report.

I think JFK Revisited correctly noted that Gerald Ford attempted to polish a Person with his correction.

The "Person" being the incoherent medical evidence that stemmed from Kennedy's botched autopsy.

It's impossible to resolve many of the questions about the medical evidence due to the lousy autopsy conducted in 1963.

[John Iacoletti]

Again, his replies to the two questions that I quoted preclude him from having taken photos of the autopsy. Thus, he said he didn't.

Quit dancing.  He either said what you claimed or he did not.  None of the real quotes precluded anything.

[Fred Litwin]

"JFK Revisited" Misleads on the Autopsy Photographs of JFK, Part Two
Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, tries to make the point that a whole set of autopsy photographs are missing. But the whole truth about Saundra Spencer's testimony is left out...

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-misleads-on-the-autopsy-photographs-of-jfk-part-two

[W. Tracy Parnell]

"JFK Revisited" Misleads on the Autopsy Photographs of JFK, Part Two
Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, tries to make the point that a whole set of autopsy photographs are missing. But the whole truth about Saundra Spencer's testimony is left out...

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-misleads-on-the-autopsy-photographs-of-jfk-part-two

Another great report Fred.

[Jon Banks]

Dick Russell on JFK Revisited:

For students of the assassination, JFK Revisited doesn’t present fresh theories or new evidence. There is no attempt to identify additional shooters or name their locations, or to finger  suspects in high places. The facts are the same as they’ve been for 58 years.

For that long, they have been hiding in plain sight: The Warren Commission’s conclusions, that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and there was no evidence of a conspiracy, are flat-out lies. The documentary is a reminder, reemphasizing how wide-ranging the cover-up was (and continues to be). Stone also offers an excellent primer for a new generation unfamiliar with what happened and why it still matters.

Scripted by Jim DiEugenio, author of several books on the assassination and co-founder of Citizens for Truth about the Kennedy Assassination, JFK Revisited sometimes moves too quickly for the novice viewer to fully grasp a particular sequence. But it leaves little doubt that three key points in the “official” narrative are fabricated: the number of bullets fired at the presidential motorcade, the military autopsy, and Oswald’s involvement.

https://whowhatwhy.org/culture/journalism-media/why-jfk-revisited-is-necessary/

[Mike Orr]

Jerry Ford was the mole from the Warren Commission who kept J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ up to date on what the commission was discussing ! With Ford moving the back shot up to the base of the back of the neck which made the Magic bullet one of the most absurd ideas ever! Did Ford just do this on his own without talking it over with the rest of the Commission ? Dulles would have agreed with this moving shot no matter what since JFK fired him from the C.I.A. ......

[Fred Litwin]

"JFK Revisited" Misleads on Admiral George Burkley and Conspiracy Theorists
Oliver Stone's so-called documentary, JFK Revisited, misleads viewers on Dr. Burkley's interactions with conspiracy theorists. And, the ARRB was also misleading. This is the first of several posts on Dr. Burkley.

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/jfk-revisited-misleads-on-admiral-george-burkley-and-conspiracy-theorists

[Mike Orr]

The front bullet wound in JFK's neck looked nothing like what we were told by the Parkland Dr's . So how in the world did this frontal neck wound picture make that wound look like a wide gash which of course would make the wound look like an exit wound when the wound was originally said to look like a wound of entry about the size and roundness of a pencil ? It sounds like the Autopsy Dr's at Bethesda were trying to say that the Parkland Dr's did not have a clue about the way JFK's frontal neck wound looked .