You're quite fond of estimations, aren't you.
1:06 - 1:07 qualifies as 'just after 1pm' imo
Markham could have meant the time she left the house
We all know her roundabout way of attaching her responses to questions
that seem to confuse her
Let's see where Markham's time is corroborated
She seems ti be in the same boat as Earlene in that department
Nobody had to wait for the news at 1PM
The CBS bulletin came on at 12:40pm
And are you sure Bowley's watch was of good quality?
Maybe closer to Mickey than Rolex..
Classic Chapman, go after one detail and ignore the rest. The irony is that I am simply using the testimony of the WC star witness in the Tippit case and Chapman is questioning it with another one of his "could have" games. Go figure....
I have explained all this to you several times, but you simply ignore and dismiss it only to start again with the same challenge of one detail out of a coherent timeline.
It doesn't make any significant difference if Markham meant the time she left her house on 9th street because it only took one block, or around 2 minutes, to walk to the junction of 10th and Patton, which means she would have arrived there at 1.08 and she would be at the bus stop on Jefferson at no later than 1.11. In other words, if Tippit was killed at 1.14 or 1.15, Markham would not have been there. She would have been at the bus stop instead.
Another pathetic argument. Earlene Roberts wasn't waiting for the news at 1 pm. She said that a friend told her about the assassination so she wanted to watch the 1 pm news. There is a difference, but it will probably go over your head.
In any event, the WC presented a timeline which has Oswald arriving at the rooming house just before 1 pm and when he walked in Roberts was trying to get the television to work.
Just keep throwing things against the wall, hoping something will stick, but the timeline I have presented in it's combined form makes it highly unlikely, if not impossible, for Bowley's watch to be wrong by much.
If you want to make a case, in which Markham's estimate is off and Bowley's watch was wrong, then all you have to do is provide an alternative timeline that fits all the known facts. And exactly that is your biggest problem. You can't, which is why you keep attacking individual points of the timeline.
There is only one question you need to answer to understand what really happened; Why did the investigators and the WC ignore Bowley completely? One of the main witnesses in the Tippit case, the one who called the DPD dispatcher, the one who - together with Callaway - helped put Tippit in the ambulance.....They completely erased him from the case. He is not mentioned in the WC report at all..... Now, why do you think is that?
Classic Chapman, go after one detail and ignore the rest. The irony is that I am simply using the testimony of the WC star witness in the Tippit case and Chapman is questioning it with another one of his "could have" games. Go figure....
You're being a bit hypocritical here. You claim you're "simply using the testimony", yet you ignore the portion of that same testimony which tells you that Oswald was the cop-killer.