Your contention that Markham would have been at the bus stop at Jefferson by 1:15 is speculation on your part.
Your contentions that Bowley’s watch was accurate and that he was on your dreamed up time table are speculations on your part.
Your contention that the time that is written for the death of Tippit was intended to indicate the time that the doctor declared him dead (instead of the actual time of his death) is speculation on your part.
Without your speculation as context, the other items are not relevant.
Your contention that Markham would have been at the bus stop at Jefferson by 1:15 is speculation on your part. BS. Markham herself said she catched her regular bus at around 1.15. There is no speculation on my part. It is
factual information provided by a witness. You, on the other hand, want to speculate without a shred of evidence that she normally wasn't at the bus stop at 1.15.
Your contentions that Bowley’s watch was accurate and that he was on your dreamed up time table are speculations on your part.Wrong again. It was Bowley himself who said in his affidavit that he looked at his watch and it said 1.10. I merely quoted that
fact. You on the other hand are speculating, without a shred of evidence, that his watch wasn't accurate.
Your contention that the time that is written for the death of Tippit was intended to indicate the time that the doctor declared him dead (instead of the actual time of his death) is speculation on your part. Again, I merely stated the
fact that the DOA time the Justice of the Peace wrote on the authorization for autopsy was 1.15. It is again you who is speculating that the DOA time given on that official document was not the time the doctor declared him dead and you are doing so, as per usual, without a shred of evidence.
I on the other hand have a report from Detective Davenport, who was present at the hospital, in which he confirmed the DOA time of 1.15 and thus corroborates the DOA time on the document.
It appears that you are having great difficulty in understanding the difference between a fact and speculation.
And once again you are trying to attack a timelime that contains corroboration for each item, by cherry picking individual details of the timeline. It isn't going to work. If my timeline is wrong, you need to provide an alternative one which covers all the known facts.
But you can't, can you now?